Re: Local repository move

Am 21.10.2011 08:39, schrieb White, David (KWI C54): This may seem like a dumb question, but I cannot find out how to do this. Make sure the repos are not accessed at the moment (turn off Apache/svnserve) and then just do a file-system move operation using your preferred file management utili

Local repository move

This may seem like a dumb question, but I cannot find out how to do this. I have several local repositories on a WinXP machine, and I want to move them to another folder on the same machine, as part of renaming required to assist migration to Win7. I thought I needed to use something like

Re: Merge strategies?

On 21.10.2011 1:56, Bob Archer wrote: 1) Do you usually merge upstream or downstream? 2) Do you set mergeinfo when merging downstream? 3) Do you set mergeinfo when merging upstream? 4) Do you set mergeinfo when merging from feature branch? 1) We generally only merge up version. A fix is made i

Error

--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apache.org) with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But

Case-only renames

The Subversion 1.7 release notes say: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#windows-case-change > Changing case of file and directory names on Windows > > Subversion on Windows now fully supports changing the case of file and > directory names. No more special workarounds, a

Re: Upgrade to svn 1.7 on cygwin causes W155007 not a working copy?

Daniel and everyone, On 19 October 2011 19:40, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Mark Utting wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:40:08 +1000: > > Summary: > > It seems that the new top-level .svn directory spontaneously disappears > > sometimes? > > Which leaves me with a useless working copy... > > > > Do yo

Re: Vedr: revision number offset

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:14, morten bjoernsvik wrote: > Thanks Andy > > Most of the servers I work on do not have internet access, only citrix/cisco > vpn via > putty and openscp. So I can only scp a file back and forth, but no ssh+svn. I'm puzzled by this. SCP uses the same port(s) as SSH - si

Re: Vedr: revision number offset

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 17:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:08, morten bjoernsvik wrote: > >> In many cases with small projects I move the repository around >> (like we have been used to with git) >> svnadmin dump | bzip2 > repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 >> and then: >> svnadmin

Re: Error attempting to commit changes.

James Moore wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 15:23:19 -0600: > As much information as possible: Thank you! > What I've done: I've rebooted my machine - result: no change. > Let me know what I can do to help find a solution to this. Thanks! 1.7.1 will be released in a few days and relaxes the parti

RE: Merge strategies?

> On 20.10.2011 17:55, Bob Archer wrote: > >> On 19.10.2011 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22:05PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > What about my other fears, bloated svn:mergeinfo > >>> > >>> The entire svn:mergeinfo property is stored in RAM and parsed from >

Error attempting to commit changes.

--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apache.org) with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But please

FYI

After reverting changes to the a file I got the below exception. I recently upgraded my client to 1.7 (from 1.6) and converted all my working copies. --- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take

Re: Vedr: revision number offset

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:08, morten bjoernsvik wrote: > In many cases with small projects I move the repository around > (like we have been used to with git) > svnadmin dump | bzip2 > repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 > and then: > svnadmin create > bzip2 -dc repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 | svnadmin

Re: mergeinfo marked not inheritable on sparse checkout

On Oct 20, 10:45 am, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Which version of SVN are you running when you hit the problem > you described in your first post? 1.6 or 1.7? Subversion 1.7.0

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 22:07:42 +0200: > Which I have the slight impression could be caused by user grepping > for something and then editing the pristine copy by mistake. The text-base files have the "read only" permission set. If people edit them they should consider themsel

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:27:38 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:38:58 +0200: > > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:26:06 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Have users always run 'svn cleanup' before they leave for the night on > > > any wc's that they ^C'd during the da

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:31:21 -0500: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Huang wrote: > > > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > >> No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the > >> potential for losing uncommitted changes. > > >

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Dave Huang wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the >> potential for losing uncommitted changes. > > Why would you lose them? The upgrade process doesn't delete or modify y

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Andreas Krey wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:38:58 +0200: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:26:06 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Have users always run 'svn cleanup' before they leave for the night on > > any wc's that they ^C'd during the day? > > How about setting a 'busy' flag while svn is executing, a

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 14:03:58 -0500: > Is there any tool that you can run to do a corruption check on a 1.6 > working copy that does not overwrite a needed 1.6 program and does not > actually do the upgrade? It seems like it would be a good thing to > know whether or not you

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > No, I'm just being difficult because you didn't seem to care about the > potential for losing uncommitted changes. Why would you lose them? The upgrade process doesn't delete or modify your files, right? It only changes the contents of the .svn

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:03:58PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > >> > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy. > >> > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable. > >> > >> So why bother to upgrade them at

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy. >> > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable. >> >> So why bother to upgrade them at all if success is unimportant? > > You misunderstood what I meant. No, I'

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:53:19PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy. > > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable. > > So why bother to upgrade them at all if suc

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > The unlucky user should simply get a new working copy. > Working copies are and have always been considered disposable. So why bother to upgrade them at all if success is unimportant? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Les Mikesell writes: > Perhaps it is obvious and known to you. I think the number of error > reports on the list indicates that the scenarios that cause errors are > not generally well understood. The error in this case: line 1935: assertion failed (svn_checksum_match(entry_md5_checksum, foun

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:26:06 +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: ... > > > Upgrading a working copy that requires cleanup is not. > > > > How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? > > You'll get E155021. Which would then mean that I need to reinstall 1.6, cleanup, and go back

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 20:07:17 +0200: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:01:32PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf > > wrote: > > > I don't understand the question.  As a rule, when upgrade fails the > > > working copy remains usable

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:30:34PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > >> > I don't understand the question.  As a rule, when upgrade fails the > >> > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn. > >> > >> Which you won't have any

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> > I don't understand the question.  As a rule, when upgrade fails the >> > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn. >> >> Which you won't have any longer  if you or your system administrator >> has updated the programs. >

SVN Exception

--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apache.org) with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But please

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:01:32PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > I don't understand the question.  As a rule, when upgrade fails the > > working copy remains usable by the older version of svn. > > Which you won't have any longer if yo

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? >> > >> > You'll get E155021. >> >> But only after it is too late, right?   Are there any tools to check >> this that don't overwrite the versions that might have stil

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47:25 -0500: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > > >> > >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? > > > > You'll get E155021. > > But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:47:25PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > > >> > >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? > > > > You'll get E155021. > > But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> >> How is a user supposed to know if his working copy requires cleanup? > > You'll get E155021. But only after it is too late, right? Are there any tools to check this that don't overwrite the versions that might have still been able t

Re: mergeinfo marked not inheritable on sparse checkout

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:35:41AM -0700, Douglas Wilson wrote: > > On Oct 19, 11:06 am, Douglas Wilson wrote: > > On Oct 19, 12:29 am, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > > > There were a lot of merge-tracking improvements and bugfixes in 1.7, > > > but I'm not sure if this particular issue has been a

Re: mergeinfo marked not inheritable on sparse checkout

On Oct 19, 11:06 am, Douglas Wilson wrote: > On Oct 19, 12:29 am, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > > > There were a lot of merge-tracking improvements and bugfixes in 1.7, > > but I'm not sure if this particular issue has been addressed. See > > http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html#

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:20:16 -0500: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf > wrote: > > Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400: > >> > > >> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you > >> > propose me > >> > to checko

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400: >> > >> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you >> > propose me >> > to checkout??? You are crazy? >> >> You tried to upgrade a working copy with pendin

Re: Merging to branches error

Not surprised; the problem is most likely related to the state of your working copies and the history of the branches you were merging. Was there anything noteworthy about either of those? Dimitry Gavrilov wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 16:58:58 +: > Hi Daniel, > > Thank you for the reply. >

RE: Merging to branches error

Hi Daniel, Thank you for the reply. I tried to completely reinstall tortoise 1.7 and checkout my subversions again and it seems to work now. The problem was when I upgraded old subversion structure from 1.6 to 1.7. I will let you know if the problem appears again. Dimitry Gavrilov Senior Lea

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

Bob Archer wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:43:58 -0400: > > > > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you > > propose me > > to checkout??? You are crazy? > > You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy? Updating a working copy that

Re: Help! Subversion Exception!

On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:43:58 +, Bob Archer wrote: ... > You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy? I'm not aware that you can run two tortoises in parallel, which means you have no chance of not upgrading an old WC if you want to update it -> all of our WC h

Vedr: revision number offset

Thanks Andy Most of the servers I work on do not have internet access, only citrix/cisco vpn via putty and openscp. So I can only scp a file back and forth, but no ssh+svn. Git is fine, but the support for it in komodo(our IDE) is poor and we have beeen using svn for years.  I also like to cle

Re: workqueue.c line 672: assertion failed (checksum !=NULL)

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 02:15:28PM +, Michael Bryans wrote: > Trying to update local folder and get this: > > [cid:image001.png@01CC8F10.F73CD6F0] > > Cleanup fails. Updates will not work stating a previous process is not > complete. It never completes. Stuck! > Get a new checkout. This

workqueue.c line 672: assertion failed (checksum !=NULL)

Trying to update local folder and get this: [cid:image001.png@01CC8F10.F73CD6F0] Cleanup fails. Updates will not work stating a previous process is not complete. It never completes. Stuck! Regards, Michael Bryans <>

RE: Help! Subversion Exception!

Upgrading to svn 1.7 whose principal feature is a major change to the working copy, with local mods, is just plain dumb. From: Igor d [mailto:igoro...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 October 2011 15:20 To: Igor d; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Help! Subversion Exception! But if i have a lot of di

Re: revision number offset

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:08, morten bjoernsvik wrote: > Hi All > I'm a very pleased svn user, but I have this little issue. > In many cases with small projects I move the repository around > (like we have been used to with git) > svnadmin dump | bzip2 > repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 > and then:

Re: Merge strategies?

On 20.10.2011 17:55, Bob Archer wrote: On 19.10.2011 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22:05PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: What about my other fears, bloated svn:mergeinfo The entire svn:mergeinfo property is stored in RAM and parsed from string form into a data stru

revision number offset

Hi All I'm a very pleased svn user, but I have this little issue. In many cases with small projects I move the repository around (like we have been used to with git) svnadmin dump | bzip2 > repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 and then: svnadmin create bzip2 -dc repository_revXX.svndump.bz2 | svnadmi

RE: Merge strategies?

> On 19.10.2011 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22:05PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > >> What about my other fears, bloated svn:mergeinfo > > > > The entire svn:mergeinfo property is stored in RAM and parsed from > > string form into a data structure (nested hash tab

RE: Help! Subversion Exception!

> > But if i have a lot of different local modifications in sources, you propose > me > to checkout??? You are crazy? You tried to upgrade a working copy with pending changes in it? Are you crazy? BOb

[no subject]

--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apache.org) with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But please

Subversion Exception

--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apache.org) with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But

Re: Find the changed line numbers in a file

Then install diffstat.exe and repeat what Stefan said :) It's probably in the diffutils or diffstat package on gnuwin32.sf.net or a similar place. subhash_m wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:56:41 -0700: > > Thanks for diffstat suggestion. But I am on Windows. :( > > > Stefan Sperling-7 wrote:

Re: Cooke, do you know how to using the get_log API to fetch subversion history along with path kind{file, directory}?

Do not email individual people. They are volunteers and it's rude to demand answers from them, especially when they've already seen your list posts.

Re: How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 01:09:41PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:57:47PM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > If the server restricted me to get the kind, what's the fastest way to fetch > > it in other way? > > No. The whole point of authorization is to prevent unauth

Re: How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:57:47PM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > 在 2011年10月20日星期四，Stefan Sperling 写道： > > Only 1.6 and better support svn_log_changed_path2_t. > > Older servers will return svn_log_changed_path_t, which doesn't > > have the node kind: > > > > http://people.apache.org/~hwright/s

How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

在 2011年10月20日星期四，Stefan Sperling 写道： > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > > Thanks, that's impressive, > > The type of the node, may be svn_node_unknown.: When this happened, is > that > > depending on the server or other condition? > > Maybe you are not allowed

Re: Find the changed line numbers in a file

Thanks for diffstat suggestion. But I am on Windows. :( Stefan Sperling-7 wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:24:55AM -0700, subhash_m wrote: >> >> Hi Mark, >> I want to do this from a script. Basically script should find out numbers >> of >> the lines changed in the file. > > Install diff

Re: How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 06:28:07PM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > Thanks, that's impressive, > The type of the node, may be svn_node_unknown.: When this happened, is that > depending on the server or other condition? Maybe you are not allowed to see the path because of access restrictions. >

Re: Find the changed line numbers in a file

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 03:24:55AM -0700, subhash_m wrote: > > Hi Mark, > I want to do this from a script. Basically script should find out numbers of > the lines changed in the file. Install diffstat, and run 'svn diff -cN | diffstat'. Example: $ svn diff -c1186167 https://svn.apache.org/repos

Re: How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

Thanks, that's impressive, The type of the node, may be svn_node_unknown.: When this happened, is that depending on the server or other condition? *Are properties modified, may be svn_tristate_unknown. *Did old servers support for this? also with text_modified

RE: Find the changed line numbers in a file

Hi Mark, I want to do this from a script. Basically script should find out numbers of the lines changed in the file. Thanks. Cooke, Mark wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: subhash_m [mailto:subhashsubh...@gmail.com] >> Sent: 20 October 2011 10:49 >> To: users@subversion.apache.o

Re: How to use get_log along with path kind {file,directory}?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:01:52AM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote: > I didn't received the reply, so I repost it, because I am just > subscribe to this list. Btw, can you be more specified, I didn't found > the place how get_log along with path kind. I assume your quesiton is about the API, rathe

Cooke, do you know how to using the get_log API to fetch subversion history along with path kind{file, directory}?

If this is not possible, what's the fastest way to do that? Thanks. -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo

RE: Find the changed line numbers in a file

> -Original Message- > From: subhash_m [mailto:subhashsubh...@gmail.com] > Sent: 20 October 2011 10:49 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Find the changed line numbers in a file > > > I want to know if there is any way I can find out the line > numbers of the > changes made to

Find the changed line numbers in a file

I want to know if there is any way I can find out the line numbers of the changes made to a file. i.e. numbers of the lines in the modified file where code is added or edited. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Find-the-changed-line-numbers-in-a-file-tp32688385p32688

Re: Strange race-condition/possible bug in Subversion 1.7.0

Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 18:06:37 -0500: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Harald Wilhelmi > wrote: > > > >    svn copy a b > >    echo -n yyy >b > >    svn commit -m 'c2' . > > > > Of cause I expect 'b' to contain 'yyy'. However sometimes it > > contains 'xxx'. After this the r

Re: Merging to branches error

Dimitry Gavrilov wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 18:27:11 +: > Hi, > > I installed tortoise 1.7 64-bit version on Win 7. > > I am getting the below error constantly while trying to commit or merge to > branches. > > What should I do? > That looks like a new bug, thanks. Do you know how to

Serious Problem - file workqueue.c

Hi, I Just did an SVN Update via TortoiseSVN on my version 1.7 SVN structure --- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list (users@subversion.apac