that directory only exists as a property of it's
parent. I'd like to use this so that I don't have to worry about
updating the libs path for my tools every time I release a new
version.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I might be able to accomplish this
or a more effective way of
Say you have multiple projects in one repository.
Is there an easy way to separate out one project tree, along with its
specific history, and move it to a new or different repository?
Thanks in advance, apologies if it's in the manual somewhere.
each function?
Thanks,
Andrew
to
checkout and commit.
I will look into WebDav support a bit more. I've read a few more webdav
notes and found the references to RFCs.
Thanks,
Andrew
150 or so folders and around
5,000 objects so I can't manually merge each one.
Thanks in advance
Andrew
Version Information
Window XP Professional SP3
Visual SVN Server running on Windows Server 2003 SP2
TortoiseSVN 1.6.12, Build 20536 - 32 Bit , 2010/11/24 20:59:01
Subve
still uses PBLs.
Cheers
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: amit.sas...@wipro.com [mailto:amit.sas...@wipro.com]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2011 20:25
To: mdi...@elego.de
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; sudip.da...@wipro.com;
pabitra.mall...@wipro.com; avik.na...@wipro.com; sourav.s...
:
Faulting application svn.exe, version 1.6.12.38263, faulting module
sliksvn-libapr-1.dll, version 1.3.12.0, fault address 0x6b66.
-Original Message-
From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January 2011 23:10
To: SUMNER Andrew
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
S
beautifully after that.
Thanks
Andrew
The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and/or sensitive. It
is intended for the addressee only and is not necessarily the official view or
communication of the New Zealand Customs Service. If you are not the intended
recipient you are asked
using svn 1.6.13
When I attempt to delete it, it gives me a message indicating success,
however the property persists. Any ideas how to remove this? Can I safely
edit the revprops 0 file?
svn propdel svn:sync-lock --revprop -r 0 REPO_URL
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 03:59:10PM -0500, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > using svn 1.6.13
> > When I attempt to delete it, it gives me a message indicating success,
> >
It was a hook preventing the deletion, not sure why I got a success message.
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:22:30PM -0500, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > svn propdel svn:sync-lock --revprop -r 0 REPO_URL
>
> That looks good.
ual SVN (on windows server 2003) if this makes any
difference to tool selection.
The repository I wish to sync contains database script files.
Thanks
Andrew
The information contained in this e-mail may be privileged and/or sensitive. It
is intended for the addressee only and is
this for database changes...)
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:34
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sync SVN to CVS
Guten Tag SUMNER Andrew,
am Dienstag, 29. März 2011 um 21:56 schrieben Sie:
>
I totally agree. I have just started using it for a PowerBuilder
project and it has worked very well.
-Original Message-
From: David Weintraub [mailto:qazw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 April 2011 11:05
To: San Martino
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build project in pre-
ow
unversioned copy and running svn up with foo.txt as the explicit target will
correctly check it out, but it can be hard to realize that something's
missing when svn st and svn up of that directory say that everything's up to
date.
Thanks,
-Andrew
Unless you exported multiple revisions, you shouldn't need more than a few
positive matches to determine the revision.
First, compare the tree structure against the repository. You'll want to avoid
researching moved files, and this will help you narrow down your search.
Second, 'svn export' se
I have a mirror that is synced using svnsync from the master server.
The master server was updated to 1.7.1 yesterday, the mirror was updated to
1.7 last week.
I had a few good syncs occur yesterday after the master was updated.
The mirror locked up last night and was rebooted this morning.
Since t
at 1:22 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 01:13:38PM -0400, Andrew Sasak wrote:
> > I have a mirror that is synced using svnsync from the master server.
> > The master server was updated to 1.7.1 yesterday, the mirror was updated
> to
> > 1.7 last week.
&g
I maintain a mirror of a repository that I must sneakernet sync using
a "dump, burn cd, load" process. I use --deltas and --incremental to
dump. I do not have access to every directory in the repository.
Occasionally, I am given access to a directory after it has existed
for some time. The revision
svnrdump fails when access control restrictions are in place on the
server and the --incremental option is not used. The message returned
is "authorization failed". This does not occur when the --incremental
option occurs. The svnrdump command is version 1.7.2.
, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> When --incremental isn't used svnrdump tries to dump the full tree and
> runs into the authz restrictions. Do you have a suggestion for an
> alternative behaviour?
>
> Andrew Sasak wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:58:50 -0400:
>> svnrdump fails when a
Check for svn:externals that point to an external repository. That password
prompt may be for the external repository, and you're getting locked out (of
the external repo) because you are providing the wrong password for the wrong
repo.
From: Wendell Nichols [mailto:wc...@shaw.ca]
Sent: Tuesd
I know this is an old thread, but I see this error quite often with SVN
1.7. I am using Cornerstone 2.7.7 which uses SVN 1.7.5 internally. I get
corrupted working copies about once a month which of course ruins the
working copy and is very difficult to recover from in terms of wasted time.
I ne
As you've discovered, externals *always* pull in the HEAD revision unless you
specifically add a revision number to the svn:externals property. Needless to
say, "rogue" svn:externals are bad for build reproducibility and tagging.
Options are:
Audit the svn:externals (either manually, via a chec
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:18 PM
>
> 1) User Jim commits a new file A with the Revision keyword to the trunk
> in revision 101.
> 2) User Sam merges trunk revision 101 into his feature branch, and the
> new file A comes across
> -Original Message-
> From: David Sandberg [mailto:david.sandb...@hickorytech.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:52 PM
>
> Thank you for that crystal clear explanation, which accounts perfectly
> for the observed behavior. I will add that I am not sure I agree with
> the correctnes
tried to
load the mod_dav_svn.so and the mod_authz_svn.so, apache just crashes and
tells me it can't load the module.
Thanks,
Andrew
sion\subversion\libsvn_wc\update_editor.c'
Error: line 1587: assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit ||
action
Error: == svn_wc_conflict_action_delete || action ==
svn_wc_conflict_action_replace)
Completed!:
Andrew Newlands
Software & Consultancy Services Manager
Britannic T
Is it just me or is svn log's "--xml" switch not including
"--use-merge-history" information?
The text output of "svn log --use-merge-history" includes the "Merged via:
r3673" information:
r3584 | bob | 2013-04-16 1
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick [mailto:andrew.reed...@cbeyond.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 4:24 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: "svn log --xml --use-merge-history ..." doesn't include
> --use-merge-history in the xm
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 11:53 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> we have branchA
> we svn copy branchA to produce branchB
> branches A and B continues development and checkins
> branchA
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 6:49 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mergeinfo between svn copied branches and merges
>
> In this case, all you should have to do is:
> a) merge branchC
You can do a fresh checkout and not include project10 in the initial update:
svn co -N svn://.../top_dir
cd top_dir
cd svn update project1 project2 ... project 9
Future 'svn update' commands in the top_dir directory will only update projects
1 through 9.
Or you can explicitly not update project 1
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 3:05 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi All
>
> We use SVN 1.6
>
> We have a revision number which refuses to move to the merged list after
> applyi
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 4:09 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for responding; appreciate it.
>
> From: Z W [mailto:mpc8...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 8:25 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to remove revision number in mergeinfo eligible list
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Thanks for taking the time to respond.
&g
Problem: Subversion doesn't have branches.
Subversion has directory objects, and we Humans(tm) arbitrarily decide that
some directories are "branches," thereby giving these directories (branches)
magical powers and mystical significance. Meanwhile, Subversion grinds on,
treating those magic
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Well, given that you have no
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:57 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:05 AM
> To: Zé
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:24 AM
> To: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> .. snip
>
> You keep sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2013 4:17 PM
> To: Zé
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> So wh
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:30 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> Guten Tag Bob Archer,
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:24 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; David Chapman
> Subject: RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the St
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:41 AM
> To: Bob Archer
> Cc: Zé; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> Of
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:33 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branc
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 2:32 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
> On 21.05.2013 20:26, Branko Či
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:36 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> aka Branches as First Class Objects?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams
> a
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 12:31 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Merging change sets for a production release,
> Importance: High
>
> At the moment we do all of our work on /trunk and also have
> -Original Message-
> From: Gavin Baumanis [mailto:gbauma...@cogstate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 2:27 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Merging change sets for a production release,
>
> Hi Andrew,
> Thanks for
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> We are seeing a strange anomaly after our last check-in - on fresh checkout
> there is a tree conflict into a new path - I'v
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:12 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> I can reproduce on the versions specified above of the CygWin svn client
&
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 1:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Tree conflict on Fresh checkout
>
> A my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkSharedData.exe
> C my_project_03b_pristine/Project/settings/MkImage
> A
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 4:45 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks for your help, I will try again this.
> But this is very poor compared to ClearCase. Nobody tried to script that ?
I u
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 3:42 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
> Thanks All for your help and advices,
> But :
>
> With CC, I can easily search for any file element in a repository, and
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:57 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: History in subversion
>
>
> Thanks All again for your help,
>
>
> > If you're just trying to find a file in the current version of the repo,
> > t
> From: C M [mailto:cmanalys...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 12:39 PM
> To: C. Michael Pilato
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Ancestrally Related Error Message
>
> I think my earlier mistake might have been that I was using the --reintegrate
> option.
> Without it, I make some prog
> From: Marc Davenne [mailto:marc.dave...@cramif.cnamts.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Question about subversion
>
> Hi there. I have a question about subversion.
>
>
> I have a theory on what files should not be on SVN and I would like
I just had a commit fail midway on three different 1.8 clients without any kind
of error logged in the output, in the client's Event Viewer (Win7,) or on the
repo server's httpd logs (linux.) No dump file either. Starting with a fresh
checkout made no difference. There's no pre-commit hook.
"svn add" is having trouble with *.png files. This is with a 1.8 and a 1.7.9
client.
I create a new test repository, copy in some vender code, then when I run "svn
add" I get the following error on 1.8:
svn add build-pipeline-plugin-1.3.3
...
A build-pipeline-plu
To add insult to injury, TortoiseSVN's add just died on a .css file:
C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css
C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css\jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
File 'C:\temp\test18\foo\src\main\webapp\css\jquery.tooltip.css' has
inconsistent newlines
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:22 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "svn add" failing with "svn: E29: Can't set 'svn:eol-
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 2:00 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: "svn add" failing with "svn: E29: Can't set 'svn:eol-
s binary mime type property" and/or inconsistent newlines
>
> On 09.07.2013 20:33, Andrew Reedick wrote:
> > Bingo. "Somewhere" was the operative word. The Collabnet config
> file was being read from my roaming profile instead of from my windows
> home dir.
>
> Yo
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 10:18 AM
> To: Ryan Schmidt
> Cc: Subversion Users
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior
>
> Thanks for your help, but I still do not know how to get this to work.
> Perhaps I should give a little
g that
> would affect all the files without having to issue over 200 commands or
> build a dummy directory just for importing. Although that second
> suggestion provided by Andrew is definitely better than the first.
>
> I couldn't find where it discusses the global config in
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:40 AM
> To: Thorsten Schöning; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Strange behavior
>
> Hi Thorsten
>
> A good response to a less than good post. People could take lessons
> from
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: Subversion help
> Subject: Switching
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to thank all who have been helpful. I have gotten my test project to
> merge branches successfully. Now I am trying it on our production code an
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 1:33 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; Subversion help
> Subject: RE: Switching
>
> Thanks for your reply. I agree it does not make sense. But it is
> reproducible
> -Original Message-
> From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:21 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Switching
>
> How would you like Subversion to work in your case? From my
> understanding it breaks down to something
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Thorsten Schöning; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Switching
>
>
> The problem isn't something in the way, the problem is something is
> the
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Kishalmi [mailto:lkisha...@ovi.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:15 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Feature Req: sorthand urls for branches/tags in CLI
>
>
>
> Implementation ideas:
> We put a specific property on project
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: Edwin Castro
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Switching
>
>
> I can't, off the top of my head, think of a scenario where it would be
> harmful to replace an unversioned
> From: Jay Vee [mailto:jvsr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 5:09 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: how to simply : $svn update ?
>
> I do '$svn status'
> and get that I am at a certain revision
>
> Type 'svn help' for usage.
> cpu:/dir>svn update
> At revision 32933.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 2013 9:09 AM
> To: Vesa Paatero
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How about a troubleshooting guide for tree conflicts?
> The SVN Book has a short chapter about tree conflicts w
/wsbi:4277,4378
Missing ranges: /portal/trunk/wsbin:4273
Andrew Reedick
CBeyond
Cloud Development, SCM
O: 678.486.8163
> From: Goor, Stefan [mailto:sg...@thetasgroup.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 11:40 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
>
> Recently when we attempted to merge a trunk project to a branch (in
> preparation of doi
> -Original Message-
> From: Goor, Stefan [mailto:sg...@thetasgroup.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 5:35 AM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Goor, Stefan; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVN merge attempting to reintegrate on a merge to a branch
>
> On Fr
> From: C M [mailto:cmanalys...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 4:05 PM
> To: Les Mikesell
> Cc: Bob Archer; Subversion
> Subject: Re: Shared branch vs single branch
>
> Unfortunately, we are lacking on processes and there's a definite lack of
> product management.
> But coming ba
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Field [mailto:geoff_fi...@aapl.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:27 PM
> To: Bert Huijben; 'JANIKOVIC Jan'; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Problem with adding files in SVN 1.8.0+. Is it in the
> tracker already?
> Hi Bert,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Richter [mailto:sver...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:29 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Copy changes from one branch to another
>
> Hi,
>
> I have the following setup
>
> trunk branch A (created from trunk)
> |
> -Original Message-
> From: Sven Richter [mailto:sver...@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 9:43 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Copy changes from one branch to another
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at
> -Original Message-
> From: John Maher [mailto:jo...@rotair.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 10:14 AM
> To: Andy Levy
> Cc: Subversion help
> Subject: RE: Branch changes
>
> Thanks for your reply Andy, that was helpful. For anyone else interested, to
> get the revision where the b
> From: Gabriela Gibson [mailto:gabriela.gib...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 7:24 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: How to display the code in my branch without merge changes?
>
> My goal is to get svn to show the current version of my code, without the
> merged c
> -Original Message-
> From: Alfred Perlstein [mailto:bri...@mu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:55 AM
> To: Gabriela Gibson; John Maher
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: How to display the code in my branch without merge changes?
> >
> > ...snip...
> >
> >
> If yo
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Reedick
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 9:19 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn: E195016: merge error is dropping last character of path
>
> So... any reason why the last character in paths are getting dropp
> From: Michel Archambault [mailto:micj...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:25 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn diff on root folder (like d:\) crash on Windows
>
>
>
> Bug found on:
> - Windows 7 64-bit
> - svn 1.8.4
> - Working copy in d:\ directly (not in a s
> -Original Message-
> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia [mailto:nka...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 7:12 AM
> To: Vladislav Javadov
> Cc: Blair Zajac; Andreas Mohr; Geoff Rowell; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svnmucc
>
> Brother, unweaving the quotes is its own proble
> From: vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za
> [mailto:vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 8:09 AM
> To: Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: Looking into using Subversion
>
> Thank for your response Nico. We what to debug from our development server.
> From: vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za
> [mailto:vanderwalt.dev...@columbus.co.za]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 1:47 AM
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: Chris Shelton; Nico Kadel-Garcia; Subversion; bob.arc...@amsi.com; Andrew
> Reedick
> Subject: Re: Looking into using Sub
> From: Edward Ned Harvey (svn4) [mailto:s...@nedharvey.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 9:13 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Branch/switch/merge question
>
> In particular, I branch (and switch) from /trunk to /branches/eharvey. I
> then make a few commits. I switch b
line 1644: internal malfunction
---
OK
---
Regards,
Andrew Marais
e-mail: <mailto:and...@logsys.co.za> and...@logsys.co.za
E-mail Disclaimer:
All business by Logistics System Integrators (Pty) Ltd is undert
> -Original Message-
> From: Alfred von Campe [mailto:alf...@von-campe.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 3:44 PM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Help with post-commit script
>
> I need to implement a post-commit hook that does the following in a
> "standard" Subversion
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 1:14 PM
> To: Andrew Reedick
> Cc: Alfred von Campe; users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help with post-commit script
>
>
> > svnlo
> From: Pablo Beltran [mailto:pbeltr...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 3:29 AM
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: log reporting some strange (for me) merged paths
> (Q.1)Why is the
>
> M /sis/branches/JDK7/ide-project/NetBeans/nbproject/genfiles.properties
>
> present in
> -Original Message-
> From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 2:47 AM
> To: Ben Reser
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Keyword expansion from merged changes
>
>
> > So in my opinion I don't think this is a good suggested featu
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
