On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I use pysvn for this and basically the code looks like this (in python):
def update_perms():
for path in propchg:
proplist = svn.propget('file:permissions', path)
if not os.path.islink(path) and
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I use pysvn for this and basically the code looks like this (in python):
def update_perms():
for path in propchg:
proplist = svn.propget('file:permissions', path)
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:40:55 +, Philip Martin wrote:
...
It might be faster to run a recursive propget,
It might also be erroneous. I noticed in an 1.5/1.6 setup that
a recursive propget over a big subtree simply fails to yield *all*
relevant properties. That is, a
svn pg -R svn:externals
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I use pysvn for this and basically the code looks like this (in python):
def update_perms():
for
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 13:55:51 +0100:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I use pysvn for this and basically
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 13:55:51 +0100:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Philip Martin
philip.mar...@wandisco.com wrote:
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
On 11/16/11 18:40, Philip Martin
On 10/27/11 14:57, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu
mailto:b...@fsn.hu wrote:
ZFS.
It it worth to make benchmarks with this WC with 1.6 and 1.7? I so,
I can try to find the time for it.
There are some pretty easy to run benchmarks you
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
I use pysvn for this and basically the code looks like this (in python):
def update_perms():
for path in propchg:
proplist = svn.propget('file:permissions', path)
if not os.path.islink(path) and proplist.has_key(path):
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
I've upgraded the WC with 1.7.0, then switched to 1.7.1, which I'm
currently using.
The upgrade took nearly one
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:47:51AM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
I've upgraded the WC with 1.7.0, then switched to
Hi,
Von: Attila Nagy [mailto:b...@fsn.hu]
BTW, with the current (1.7) WC-implementation, what possible problems do you
see where this would be needed?
Previously with the per-directory .svn directories it was of course much
easier, I could checkout the WC and move the .svn directory to
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:53:11AM +, Markus Schaber wrote:
Hi,
Von: Attila Nagy [mailto:b...@fsn.hu]
BTW, with the current (1.7) WC-implementation, what possible problems do
you see where this would be needed?
Previously with the per-directory .svn directories it was of course
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
I've upgraded the WC with 1.7.0, then switched to 1.7.1, which I'm
currently
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu b...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
I've upgraded the WC with
On 10/27/11 13:47, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu
mailto:b...@fsn.hu wrote:
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu mailto:b...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn
On 10/27/11 12:58, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
On 10/26/11 15:37, Philip Martin wrote:
Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
I've upgraded the WC with 1.7.0,
Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com writes:
I would imagine svn upgrade is almost entirely writes and I recall it does
quite a few transactions. So couldn't the linear slow down just be based on
the growth in the amount of bytes that are written to disk each time?
Yes, number of transactions
On 10/27/11 14:13, Philip Martin wrote:
Mark Phippardmarkp...@gmail.com writes:
I would imagine svn upgrade is almost entirely writes and I recall it does
quite a few transactions. So couldn't the linear slow down just be based on
the growth in the amount of bytes that are written to disk
Hi, Stefan,
Von: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 09:53:11AM +, Markus Schaber wrote:
If you have uncommitted property modifications, copies or moves in the
working copy, a lossless transition (or repair) of the WC to 1.7 should be
possible in the following
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
ZFS.
It it worth to make benchmarks with this WC with 1.6 and 1.7? I so, I can
try to find the time for it.
There are some pretty easy to run benchmarks you can run to see if 1.7 is
simply slower in your environment. See:
Hi,
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
(upgraded the WC to the new -sadly much slower- format) and always get this:
$ svn up
Updating '.':
Skipped 'mail/20110624/usr/local/etc/blacklist' -- Node remains in conflict
svn: E235000: In file
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu wrote:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
(upgraded the WC to the new -sadly much slower- format) and always get this:
Is your WC on a network drive? That is the only scenario I have seen
where 1.7.x
Attila Nagy b...@fsn.hu writes:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
Did you upgrade with 1.7.0 or 1.7.1?
$ svn up
Updating '.':
svn: E235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c' line
1582: assertion failed (action == svn_wc_conflict_action_edit
On 10/26/11 15:31, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:01 AM, Attila Nagyb...@fsn.hu wrote:
I'm trying to update a working copy of some tens of GBs with svn 1.7.1
(upgraded the WC to the new -sadly much slower- format) and always get this:
Is your WC on a network drive? That is
24 matches
Mail list logo
