Good day
I've tried it with the last version from staging repository (tapestry
5-alpha-25) and last version from Git repo (5-alpha-26).
I use Eclipse 4.4.0 with maven-jetty-plugin 9.0.4.v20130625 (tested
also with 6.1.16 in an new Quickstart Project)
Browsers: Popover Failed in Waterfox 24.0 and
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:30:05 -0200, Matthias thegreatme...@gmail.com
wrote:
@Howard
Thanks for your reply. I know that it was possible with Java code, but i
tried to avoid to write extra methods for such simple tasks.
Please don't ask us how to make your code and templates be worse and
Hi everyone,
I want to build a service that works transparently for web request threads and
system threads. If called in a web request it should utilize session storage
via ASM and if called from a background thread it should just return the value
of a ThreadLocal?.
What I can't find out is:
Hi,
RequestGlobals.getRequest() should return null I think:
http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/RequestGlobals.html#getRequest()
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Wechsung, Wulf wulf.wechs...@sap.comwrote:
Hi everyone,
I want to build a service that
Hi,
judging from the stack trace I think RequestGlobals actually returns a non-null
proxy that NPEs because it's delegate is actually null.
Kind Regards,
Wulf
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Gusev [mailto:dmitry.gu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Montag, 18. November 2013 13:45
To: Tapestry users
RequestGlobals will return the same as you store into it using
http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/RequestGlobals.html#storeRequestResponse(org.apache.tapestry5.services.Request,
org.apache.tapestry5.services.Response)
As far as I can see this method is only
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:39:22 -0200, Wechsung, Wulf wulf.wechs...@sap.com
wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
judging from the stack trace I think RequestGlobals actually returns a
non-null proxy that NPEs because it's delegate is actually null.
I don't think that's correct. You'll get an NPE if you inject
All I did was create a zone within the parent container and update that, works
fine and saved me from a wasteful outer rerendering.
John
- Original Message -
From: Chris Mylonas
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: zone containing a
Hi guys,
There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found here:
http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/
To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me very
nervous to even consider Tapestry for our
Anton Arhipov answered similar question there:
As we mentioned before, it is not possible to cover all the frameworks in
one go.
...
You could ask the same about any other framework that you probably like,
and the answer would be the same.
Also, JRebel doesn't support tapestry5, so this might be yet another point
to not put it to the report.
Btw, as Anton said in one conference, they don't support Tapestry5 because
tapestry already implements something similar with service live reloading.
Though T5's class reloading is very poor in
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:12:48 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah eso...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
Hi! Long time, no see! :P
There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found
here:
http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/
To my
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:49:38 -0200, Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think this is something that may need to be improved in T5. Like,
adding new files to service interfaces, changing method signatures,
adding/removing annotations to service methods/page/component classes,
Mood Gorning Tapestry Users,
What is the consensus on e-commerce stuff? I'm currently looking at a
couple of payment gateways to integrate with
1) Eway
2) Braintree
The spark framework braintree uses has also made me curious for further
development/integration with tapestry.
Any comments are
I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this
tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar to
this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this thread.
On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah eso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
I've implemented two payment gateways that have a SOAP interface. I tend to
prefer that since the UI looks like the rest of my web site. And it's trivial.
I typically do basic verification myself and then pass the rest off to the
gateway APIs.
You can get better rates and faster payment via
Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil old
incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and feels bad about
it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties).
- Original Message -
From: Lance Java
To: Tapestry users
Sent:
17 matches
Mail list logo