Re: 'bootstrap/popover' Module

2013-11-18 Thread Eugen
Good day I've tried it with the last version from staging repository (tapestry 5-alpha-25) and last version from Git repo (5-alpha-26). I use Eclipse 4.4.0 with maven-jetty-plugin 9.0.4.v20130625 (tested also with 6.1.16 in an new Quickstart Project) Browsers: Popover Failed in Waterfox 24.0 and

Re: conditional expression

2013-11-18 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 15:30:05 -0200, Matthias thegreatme...@gmail.com wrote: @Howard Thanks for your reply. I know that it was possible with Java code, but i tried to avoid to write extra methods for such simple tasks. Please don't ask us how to make your code and templates be worse and

Interface Request

2013-11-18 Thread Wechsung, Wulf
Hi everyone, I want to build a service that works transparently for web request threads and system threads. If called in a web request it should utilize session storage via ASM and if called from a background thread it should just return the value of a ThreadLocal?. What I can't find out is:

Re: Interface Request

2013-11-18 Thread Dmitry Gusev
Hi, RequestGlobals.getRequest() should return null I think: http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/RequestGlobals.html#getRequest() On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Wechsung, Wulf wulf.wechs...@sap.comwrote: Hi everyone, I want to build a service that

RE: Interface Request

2013-11-18 Thread Wechsung, Wulf
Hi, judging from the stack trace I think RequestGlobals actually returns a non-null proxy that NPEs because it's delegate is actually null. Kind Regards, Wulf -Original Message- From: Dmitry Gusev [mailto:dmitry.gu...@gmail.com] Sent: Montag, 18. November 2013 13:45 To: Tapestry users

Re: Interface Request

2013-11-18 Thread Dmitry Gusev
RequestGlobals will return the same as you store into it using http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/services/RequestGlobals.html#storeRequestResponse(org.apache.tapestry5.services.Request, org.apache.tapestry5.services.Response) As far as I can see this method is only

Re: Interface Request

2013-11-18 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 11:39:22 -0200, Wechsung, Wulf wulf.wechs...@sap.com wrote: Hi, Hi! judging from the stack trace I think RequestGlobals actually returns a non-null proxy that NPEs because it's delegate is actually null. I don't think that's correct. You'll get an NPE if you inject

Re: zone containing a scrollable element

2013-11-18 Thread John
All I did was create a zone within the parent container and update that, works fine and saved me from a wasteful outer rerendering. John - Original Message - From: Chris Mylonas To: Tapestry users Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:01 AM Subject: Re: zone containing a

Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
Hi guys, There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found here: http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me very nervous to even consider Tapestry for our

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Dmitry Gusev
Anton Arhipov answered similar question there: As we mentioned before, it is not possible to cover all the frameworks in one go. ... You could ask the same about any other framework that you probably like, and the answer would be the same.

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Dmitry Gusev
Also, JRebel doesn't support tapestry5, so this might be yet another point to not put it to the report. Btw, as Anton said in one conference, they don't support Tapestry5 because tapestry already implements something similar with service live reloading. Though T5's class reloading is very poor in

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:12:48 -0200, Emmanuel Sowah eso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys, Hi! Long time, no see! :P There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be found here: http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ To my

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:49:38 -0200, Dmitry Gusev dmitry.gu...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is something that may need to be improved in T5. Like, adding new files to service interfaces, changing method signatures, adding/removing annotations to service methods/page/component classes,

consensus on payments (braintree payments in particular, spark library)

2013-11-18 Thread Chris Mylonas
Mood Gorning Tapestry Users, What is the consensus on e-commerce stuff? I'm currently looking at a couple of payment gateways to integrate with 1) Eway 2) Braintree The spark framework braintree uses has also made me curious for further development/integration with tapestry. Any comments are

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread Lance Java
I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar to this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this thread. On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah eso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi guys,

Re: consensus on payments (braintree payments in particular, spark library)

2013-11-18 Thread Norman Franke
I've implemented two payment gateways that have a SOAP interface. I tend to prefer that since the UI looks like the rest of my web site. And it's trivial. I typically do basic verification myself and then pass the rest off to the gateway APIs. You can get better rates and faster payment via

Re: Web frameworks

2013-11-18 Thread John
Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and feels bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties). - Original Message - From: Lance Java To: Tapestry users Sent: