-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
oh, now - raked isn't at all what I was going for... although it does
have a certain ring to it. :-)
I've got a push going on this week but will be opening it up this
weekend. To be clear - I _will_ be putting up the current as well as the
'unicorn'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is a link on the home page to Tassel - under Related Projects
Peter Svensson wrote:
Actually, one does not exclude the other. Tassel has a large number of
components already. My only gripe with tassel is that there is not direct
link to it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JavaOne ending was my main hold off on doing anything further on this
subject, but as attendees start migrating back, I'll comment a bit here:
(and if you can't take tongue and cheek, delete and move on)
Steve Motola wrote:
javaone tapering off,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I would like to apologize for any lack of helpfulness you may have
experienced. The addresses on the site are, as you correctly pointed
out, incorrect due to the recent promotion of Tapestry to TLP status.
This transition is in progress, but I will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(and have the tapestry-annotations jar on your classpath?)
James Carman wrote:
Are you using JDK5?
-Original Message-
From: Rui Pacheco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:24 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This is where definitions of currently come in to play :-)
The 3.x series also references it in the inspector.
Andreas Andreou wrote:
For those wondering, it's currently used by contrib:Palette
Sergei Dubov wrote:
Politely tell your legal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carl Pelletier wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm currently building a web site and looking for
documentations on how-to or best practice of implementing Role security
in Tapestry 4.0.
It`s a Simple CRUD application and we need to give some security to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
And now, the required:
Is it done yet? Do you have a demo? ;-)
James Carman wrote:
I would probably do it as a generalized HiveMind library first which
includes an AcegiInterceptor implementation of some sort. Then, I'd write a
