On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:27 PM, robert baker wrote:
> I wanted to write a doc snippet to go in the Component Classes page in
> the guide under "Transient Instance Variables" in a warning
> box/pullout after the first paragraph, rewording and summing up what
> you both have said:
> """
> Never ini
Hey I just wanted to thank you both (Josh and Thiago) before I forget;
this helped solve a tough production bug that was affecting a lot of
people.
I wanted to write a doc snippet to go in the Component Classes page in
the guide under "Transient Instance Variables" in a warning
box/pullout after t
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 03:35:53 -0200, robert baker
wrote:
Hi all,
Hi!
When a page/component is transformed (in version 5.2.6) and there is a
field like the following:
private List aList = new ArrayList();
You should never, never, never, ever initialize a component, page or mixin
field
> Does the inline initialization claim the field at transformation-time
> so that it is not cleared during request detachment?
The inline initialization is used to reset the value at the end of a
request. So, if you put stuff in the default list then you are going
to see it in all of your pages. I
Hi all,
When a page/component is transformed (in version 5.2.6) and there is a
field like the following:
private List aList = new ArrayList();
Does the inline initialization claim the field at transformation-time
so that it is not cleared during request detachment?
("Claim" as in what the @Reta
t; >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Canfield >wrote:
> >>
> >>> Also, rest resources can be bound as services to use injection and
> advice.
> >>> On Aug 4, 2011 8:05 AM, "Taha Hafeez"
> wrote:
> >>> > Hi Rendy
> >>> &
>> Rendy.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Canfield wrote:
>>
>>> Also, rest resources can be bound as services to use injection and advice.
>>> On Aug 4, 2011 8:05 AM, "Taha Hafeez" wrote:
>>> > Hi Rendy
>>> &g
:)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rendy.
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Josh Canfield >wrote:
> >
> >> Also, rest resources can be bound as services to use injection and
> advice.
> >> On Aug 4, 2011 8:05 AM, "Taha Hafeez" wrote
>
>> > No ComponentClassTransformWorker will not work outside
>> > pages/components package. But class transformation is not the only
>> > reason to keep a special packages. You sometime need to scan classes
>> > for annotations etc and it is easy if you have spe
t; > Hi Rendy
> >
> > No ComponentClassTransformWorker will not work outside
> > pages/components package. But class transformation is not the only
> > reason to keep a special packages. You sometime need to scan classes
> > for annotations etc and it is easy if you h
er will not work outside
> > pages/components package. But class transformation is not the only
> > reason to keep a special packages. You sometime need to scan classes
> > for annotations etc and it is easy if you have specific packages
> > which can be contributed to the s
Also, rest resources can be bound as services to use injection and advice.
On Aug 4, 2011 8:05 AM, "Taha Hafeez" wrote:
> Hi Rendy
>
> No ComponentClassTransformWorker will not work outside
> pages/components package. But class transformation is not the only
> reason t
Hi Rendy
No ComponentClassTransformWorker will not work outside
pages/components package. But class transformation is not the only
reason to keep a special packages. You sometime need to scan classes
for annotations etc and it is easy if you have specific packages
which can be contributed to the
Hi all,
I have problem with class transformation, my question, will this class
transformation work outside from special package (pages for example). I am
using restful integration from tynamo which direct me to put my web service
in rest package. Is the package name matter with class
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:11:39 -0200, Taha Hafeez
wrote:
Can I do it in Javassist.
You'd need to ensure your Javassist-changed class version is the only one
used in your application. This is probably quite hard to do. If I needed
to something like you want, I'd study how Projet Lombok wor
We did use envers in one of our projects but it makes creating auditing
reports a project in itself. Besides the auditing is not of our liking. We,
being a financial organization, have to audit every thing and having so many
audit tables around is just too much. Also there is less control over the
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Taha Hafeez wrote:
> Back to the question. What I really want to do is provide an @Auditable
> annotation on my domain classes and then add some fields/methods at the time
> of loading the classes.
Are you sure that adding the auditing data directly to your domain
+1 Lombok. It is awesome and I've used it for some time.
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:38 AM, "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo"
wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:15:01 -0200, Taha Hafeez
> wrote:
>
>> Back to the question. What I really want to do is provide an @Auditable
>> annotation on my domain
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:15:01 -0200, Taha Hafeez
wrote:
Back to the question. What I really want to do is provide an @Auditable
annotation on my domain classes and then add some fields/methods at the
time of loading the classes.
Tapestry-IoC doesn't change classes at all. It just creates p
I know a bit of asm and I am really looking forward to browse its code but I
am too busy with migrating
our internal wicket applications to Tapestry5. We are also planning to
replace front-end of Finacle from jsp to tapestry5.
Back to the question. What I really want to do is provide an @Auditable
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:33:35 -0200, Taha Hafeez
wrote:
Hi
Hi!
There is internal support for creating new classes in tapestry ioc using
ClassFactory/ClassFab.
They're going to be deprecated soon and remved in the future. The
replacement will be Howard's Plastic package:
https://githu
Hi
There is internal support for creating new classes in tapestry ioc using
ClassFactory/ClassFab. What if I have to modify an existing class say add
methods/fields or do I have to go for javassist directly
regards
Taha
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, my bad. That is indeed not possible at the moment.
I did post and example in my first message in this thread where I was
playing with it, but I couldn't get Tapestry to process my renamed
method, so I gave it a r
Sorry, my bad. That is indeed not possible at the moment.
-Filip
Robin Helgelin skrev:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can't you just override the method instead and call the super method at
the right time?
Sure, but currently Tap
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't you just override the method instead and call the super method at
> the right time?
Sure, but currently Tapestry class transformation doesn't support
this. Or maybe I'm just bli
Can't you just override the method instead and call the super method at
the right time?
-Filip
Robin Helgelin skrev:
On Feb 19, 2008 8:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's because the code you add is effectively inside a block,
i.e. in Java it would be:
{
int i =
On Feb 19, 2008 8:47 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's because the code you add is effectively inside a block,
> i.e. in Java it would be:
> {
> int i = 5;
> }
>
> So the scope of the new variable is limited. That means you need to
> generate all the code that uses
I think it's because the code you add is effectively inside a block,
i.e. in Java it would be:
{
int i = 5;
}
So the scope of the new variable is limited. That means you need to
generate all the code that uses the variable as a single body passed
to ClassTransformation.
On Feb 19, 2008 10:55 A
On Feb 19, 2008 7:44 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could the extend method be failing because it does not return a value?
I tried returning a value, no change. It barfs on my variable i,
backtrace as this:
Caused by: org.apache.tapestry.internal.services.MethodCompileExceptio
Could the extend method be failing because it does not return a value?
On Feb 19, 2008 9:31 AM, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to do a simple prefix and extend to a single method,
> however, it seems that ClassTransformation.extendMethod(), doesn't
> find variables
Hi,
I'm trying to do a simple prefix and extend to a single method,
however, it seems that ClassTransformation.extendMethod(), doesn't
find variables declared with prefixMethod().
Simple example which throws a javassist.CannotCompileException:
transformation.prefixMethod(method, "int i =
Dan Adams a écrit :
@Once
public List getFoos() {
// do some expensive operation like reading foos from the db
}
Could you please give us the your @Once annotation source code ?
My 2 reasons are :
- I'm learning Java so I'll like to see how to write such annotation
- It is a really gr
yeah, the docs say that it adds you code to the end of it. I added a
ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1615
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 09:30 -0700, Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
> You can extend an existing method, but off the top of my head, I can't
> remember if that automatically in
You can extend an existing method, but off the top of my head, I can't
remember if that automatically invokes the existing method before
executing the new code. I think it does, which would defeat what you
are trying to do.
On 6/29/07, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You are correct
You are correct, ClassTransformation needs the ability to rename a method.
On 6/29/07, Dan Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, so I'm creating a @Once annotation that when applied to a method
like so:
@Once
public List getFoos() {
// do some expensive operation like reading foos from the d
Okay, so I'm creating a @Once annotation that when applied to a method
like so:
@Once
public List getFoos() {
// do some expensive operation like reading foos from the db
}
you can call getFoos() as much as you want and it will only actually
execute once, allowing you to reference foos many tim
36 matches
Mail list logo
