Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Jochen Frey
+1 And +1 on hibernate 4.1+ ... 3.6 is buggy for us. -- j On May 2, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > If the only reason we're moving to 1.6 is to support a newer version of > hibernate in tapestry-hibernate, then I'm -1. I specifically know of a > corporation out there using tapestr

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Robert Zeigler
If the only reason we're moving to 1.6 is to support a newer version of hibernate in tapestry-hibernate, then I'm -1. I specifically know of a corporation out there using tapestry that still uses java 1.5. Where there's one, there are many. I suppose we could write them off as "stuck on tapest

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Bob Harner
I favor switching to 1.6 when there is a significant benefit to doing so, and not before. I wouldn't want to give anybody a reason not to use this great framework. On May 2, 2012 2:05 AM, "Kalle Korhonen" wrote: > When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring > JRE 1.6 for

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Geoff Callender
+1. More than enough time has passed since Java 5 EOL (2009). I also agree with bumping up Hibernate to 4. On 02/05/2012, at 4:05 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring > JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 b

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Arno Haase
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+hDU0ACgkQbmZsMyUPuXTuCgCeNSLptu3MMhsSrlKcLZVo3Yw6 KL0AoODvsdVuEYvMn1MSeTF3r2UvVVHR =nqZF -END PGP SI

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread trsvax
+1 -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5680143.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To uns

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Greg Pagendam-Turner
Perhaps bump the Hibernate version to 4.1 too Regards, Greg On 02/05/2012, at 6:44 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi wrote: > +1 > > On May 2, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Christian Riedel wrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in cont

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Taha Hafeez Siddiqi
+1 On May 2, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Christian Riedel wrote: > +1 > > > Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java: > >> +1 >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html >> Sent fro

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Christian Riedel
+1 Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java: > +1 > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Lance Java
+1 -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To uns

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Chris Mylonas
/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html On 02/05/2012, at 5:48 PM, Peter Stavrinides wrote: > + 1 > > - Original Message - > > From: "Dimitris Zenios" > To: "Tapestry users" > Sent: Wednesday, 2 May, 2012 10:32:14 AM > Subject: Re: How do you f

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Peter Stavrinides
+ 1 - Original Message - From: "Dimitris Zenios" To: "Tapestry users" Sent: Wednesday, 2 May, 2012 10:32:14 AM Subject: Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4? +1 from me also On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Markus Grell wrote: &g

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Dimitris Zenios
+1 from me also On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Markus Grell wrote: > With Java 6 released end of 2006, I can't see any point in supporting an > older release for a new Tapestry version. > > Markus > >> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring >> JRE 1.6 for running

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Markus Grell
With Java 6 released end of 2006, I can't see any point in supporting an older release for a new Tapestry version. Markus > When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring > JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but > the time for requiring 1.6 will

Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-02 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
+1 let's switch to 1.6 as many new/modern frameworks already require it anyways. g, kris On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring > JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but > the time

How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?

2012-05-01 Thread Kalle Korhonen
When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but the time for requiring 1.6 will come at some point. Not necessarily yet - we can likely work around this - but current Hibernate 4.x releases are built with 1.6.