+1
And +1 on hibernate 4.1+ ... 3.6 is buggy for us.
-- j
On May 2, 2012, at 6:08 AM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
> If the only reason we're moving to 1.6 is to support a newer version of
> hibernate in tapestry-hibernate, then I'm -1. I specifically know of a
> corporation out there using tapestr
If the only reason we're moving to 1.6 is to support a newer version of
hibernate in tapestry-hibernate, then I'm -1. I specifically know of a
corporation out there using tapestry that still uses java 1.5. Where there's
one, there are many. I suppose we could write them off as "stuck on tapest
I favor switching to 1.6 when there is a significant benefit to doing so,
and not before. I wouldn't want to give anybody a reason not to use this
great framework.
On May 2, 2012 2:05 AM, "Kalle Korhonen" wrote:
> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
> JRE 1.6 for
+1.
More than enough time has passed since Java 5 EOL (2009).
I also agree with bumping up Hibernate to 4.
On 02/05/2012, at 4:05 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
> JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk+hDU0ACgkQbmZsMyUPuXTuCgCeNSLptu3MMhsSrlKcLZVo3Yw6
KL0AoODvsdVuEYvMn1MSeTF3r2UvVVHR
=nqZF
-END PGP SI
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5680143.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
Perhaps bump the Hibernate version to 4.1 too
Regards,
Greg
On 02/05/2012, at 6:44 PM, Taha Hafeez Siddiqi wrote:
> +1
>
> On May 2, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Christian Riedel wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in cont
+1
On May 2, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Christian Riedel wrote:
> +1
>
>
> Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java:
>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html
>> Sent fro
+1
Am 02.05.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Lance Java:
> +1
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html
> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> --
+1
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/How-do-you-feel-about-requiring-JRE-1-6-for-Tapestry-5-4-tp5679713p5679911.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To uns
/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html
On 02/05/2012, at 5:48 PM, Peter Stavrinides wrote:
> + 1
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Dimitris Zenios"
> To: "Tapestry users"
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 May, 2012 10:32:14 AM
> Subject: Re: How do you f
+ 1
- Original Message -
From: "Dimitris Zenios"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 2 May, 2012 10:32:14 AM
Subject: Re: How do you feel about requiring JRE 1.6 for Tapestry 5.4?
+1 from me also
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Markus Grell wrote:
&g
+1 from me also
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Markus Grell wrote:
> With Java 6 released end of 2006, I can't see any point in supporting an
> older release for a new Tapestry version.
>
> Markus
>
>> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
>> JRE 1.6 for running
With Java 6 released end of 2006, I can't see any point in supporting an
older release for a new Tapestry version.
Markus
> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
> JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but
> the time for requiring 1.6 will
+1
let's switch to 1.6 as many new/modern frameworks already require it anyways.
g,
kris
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
> JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but
> the time
When in doubt, let's ask the community: would you object to requiring
JRE 1.6 for running Tapestry 5.4? So far, T5 has run on JRE 1.5 but
the time for requiring 1.6 will come at some point. Not necessarily
yet - we can likely work around this - but current Hibernate 4.x
releases are built with 1.6.
16 matches
Mail list logo