Re: Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-16 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/14/06, Robin Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, no, never though of that, might be a good idea though. I'll see if I have time to try this today. Ok, debugged and problem found. Safari seems to like to cache the result of the first query to the protected page. I was using a proxy

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-14 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/12/06, Robin Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to James again :), I have a working solution that redirects after successful login. However, on Firefox it works like a charm, but on Safari it doesn't work as it seems it doesn't process cookies or something the same way. Maybe I

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-14 Thread James Carman
Oh, sorry, Robin. I read your last email, but only through the thanks, I've got it working part. :-) I didn't see the questions at the bottom. Do you have something that will let you debug the HTTP traffic? That might help you see what's going on for sure. On 11/14/06, Robin Ericsson [EMAIL

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-14 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/14/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, sorry, Robin. I read your last email, but only through the thanks, I've got it working part. :-) I didn't see the questions at the bottom. Do you have something that will let you debug the HTTP traffic? That might help you see what's

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-12 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 11/10/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You could use a callback somehow to do that, I would think. But, you would probably have to implement the auto-redirect-to-login-page logic yourself, so that you could save the callback into the session or set it on the login page as a property

RE: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas.Vaughan
Acegi's AuthenticationProcessingFilter is, by default, coded to intercept any web request to j_acegi_security_check. You can override the actual name of the servlet with the filterProcessesUrl parameter of that class. So all you need to do to link Tapestry and Acegi is just throw a

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-01 Thread James Carman
With Tapestry-Acegi, we're not using the Acegi servlet filter. On 11/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Acegi's AuthenticationProcessingFilter is, by default, coded to intercept any web request to j_acegi_security_check. You can override the actual name of the servlet with the

RE: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-11-01 Thread Thomas.Vaughan
Ohhh...sorry 'bout that. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Carman Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:08 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions With Tapestry-Acegi, we're not using the Acegi servlet filter

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-10-30 Thread Gareth
hi, I'm using the TableView component on what can be visulised as a search page. The whole page is wrapped in a form (so that the paging buttons etc submit the search criteria), and the Form version of TableRow and TablePages are used. Everything appears to work except... I have 2 gripes that

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-10-30 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 10/30/06, Gareth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, I'm using the TableView component on what can be visulised as a search page. Hi, Please don't steal other threads with a new question. -- regards, Robin - To

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-10-29 Thread Robin Ericsson
On 10/29/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Robin. I haven't implemented form-based authentication in tapestry-acegi, yet. But, I don't think it's that difficult, really. Your need to use the AuthenticationProcessingFilter (I don't define it in my hivemodule.xml, but it would be

Re: Re: tapestry-acegi questions

2006-10-29 Thread Shing Hing Man
Step C at the following might help. http://wiki.javascud.org/display/hsa/Acegi+and+Tapestry--A+Step-by-Step+Guide shing --- Robin Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/29/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Robin. I haven't implemented form-based authentication in