i just did :) ill be using these on the new version of my app
thanks again
On Aug 21, 2011, at 12:34 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 12:13 -0300 schrieb Alexis Fidalgo
> [voiceovernetinc]:
>> forget it, fixed. thanks again
> Even though. Have you had a look at the pac
Am Sonntag, den 21.08.2011, 12:13 -0300 schrieb Alexis Fidalgo
[voiceovernetinc]:
> forget it, fixed. thanks again
Even though. Have you had a look at the package java.util.concurrent? In
there are blocking queues and executor services, like the one you are
trying to write :)
Regards
Felix
>
>
Hello,
Am 21.08.2011 15:01, schrieb Venkata Surapaneni:
Verlag,
Both the suggestions worked and We are going to add address line to
the server.xml file.
Is the support for IP 4 dropped by plan or by accident ? If it is by plan,
isn't it early ? There are still lot of applications ru
forget it, fixed. thanks again
On Aug 21, 2011, at 12:06 PM, alexis wrote:
> better, concurrency issue is gone, facing a new one, i cannot stop the
> Consumer thread, i have this
>
>
> @Override
>public void run() {
>
>dao = (DAO) sc.getAttribute("dao");
>try {
>
better, concurrency issue is gone, facing a new one, i cannot stop the Consumer
thread, i have this
@Override
public void run() {
dao = (DAO) sc.getAttribute("dao");
try {
q = (Queue) sc.getAttribute("Queue");
while (keepRunning) {
C
Just checking to see in anyone had any thoughts on this one.
--
I normally use the solaris/sparc binary for mod_jk, but I see they aren't
available for download with the latest version. I'm trying to compile
JK-1.2
alexis schrieb:
>I marked this issue OT because i think is a conceptual issue and not
>related to any application per se.
>
>I have 2 main issues with concurrency, one class is a queue
>
>public class Queue {
>
>private static org.apache.log4j.Logger log =
>Logger.getLogger(Queue.class);
>
alexis schrieb:
>I marked this issue OT because i think is a conceptual issue and not
>related to any application per se.
>
>I have 2 main issues with concurrency, one class is a queue
>
>public class Queue {
>
>private static org.apache.log4j.Logger log =
>Logger.getLogger(Queue.class);
>
I marked this issue OT because i think is a conceptual issue and not related to
any application per se.
I have 2 main issues with concurrency, one class is a queue
public class Queue {
private static org.apache.log4j.Logger log = Logger.getLogger(Queue.class);
private Command command;
Hi
> Actually, I'm not entirely correct and I am now remembering this has been
> discussed before on either this list or the tomcat-dev list.
Do you remember anything else about that thread? Something that might help
me find it... ?
> Are you throwing an exception, or closing the inputstream?
Verlag,
Both the suggestions worked and We are going to add address line to the
server.xml file.
Is the support for IP 4 dropped by plan or by accident ? If it is by plan,
isn't it early ? There are still lot of applications running on IP 4 and it
will be while before every one is read
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Venkata Surapaneni [mailto:vsurapan...@imedx.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:26 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
>
> And on top of this all the log look clean. Nothing looks suspicious.
>
> ===
Hello,
so I had the brilliant idea to develop a web application using GWT
(basically javascript at the client which communicates over rpc with java
servlets) and embed it into a Joomla site. The servlets are running on
Tomcat behind an Apache2 webserver at which joomla is running. Now I need
some
And on top of this all the log look clean. Nothing looks suspicious.
As suggested I have installed the latest version(5.5.33) of Tomcat 5.5.x. After
installing I have typed in the
As suggested I have installed the latest version(5.5.33) of Tomcat 5.5.x. After
installing I have typed in the browser 'http://localhost' to check if the
tomcat is installed properly. The home page is displayed indicating that the
installation is fine. Then I typed in ip address of the machine
Venkata Surapaneni wrote:
We have a requirement to stick to 5.x version as of now. We tried using the
latest version of 5.5.x, but we encountered a issue. After installing the
tomcat and if we check in the browser as localhost, it is working fine. But if
we try accessing using IP address, then
On 21/08/2011 01:19, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Pid,
>
> On 8/20/2011 6:06 PM, Pid wrote:
>> On 19/08/2011 15:45, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>> Dan,
>>>
>>> On 8/18/2011 5:22 PM, Dan Armbrust wrote:
Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit().createImage(new byte[]{});
>>>
>>> Simply calling getDefaultToo
On 21/08/2011 08:08, Steffen Heil (Mailinglisten) wrote:
>> > AFAIK Tomcat processes the request before the user code in a servlet is
>> > active, so you can't do it from inside a servlet.
> Hm.
> Tomcat does NOT parse these POST parameters (at least not by default and not
> in my case).
> I know f
Hi
> > Short question: How can I prevent tomcat to receive the complete post
> data?
>
> Stop sending the data before it's all been sent.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean.
If you mean to send only small parts and only those that are wanted, that's
nothing I can do.
I need to support the
19 matches
Mail list logo
