We evaluated OCI driver ourselves and found that it has only one benefit
- external OPS$ account support. Otherwise THIN driver requires less
maintenance, less installation and it is often faster, because it brings
some datatypes inline (LONG, if I am not mistaken).
- Alexey.
Rumpa Giri wrote
Theoretically, the behaviour can be caused by network problems -
[reverse] DNS could not be resolved (maybe for logging), file share
becomes unavailable, etc.
- Alexey.
jnedzel wrote:
Folks:
We're having an intermittent problem with Tomcat becoming non-responsive for
a while (between 30 seco
Look there:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/HowTo#head-18d1c3f3fa702a1be769340784515eecce6e0ac9
.
- Alexey.
Rob Tanner wrote:
Hi,
How do I run Tomcat as a non-root user? I need to be able to bind to
ports 80 & 443 which are privileged ports. I know that with straight
Apache the user that i
.
Notifications only :(
Keep the ideas coming guys!
just to to check - there is no hidden setting in Tomcat which says -
shut me down at midnight sometimes for an inexplainable reason?
Martin
Alexey Solofnenko wrote:
Maybe it is caused by automatic Windows Update. Did you check it?
- Alexey.
Martin
Maybe it is caused by automatic Windows Update. Did you check it?
- Alexey.
Martin Cavanagh wrote:
Hi guys, I'm still having this problem.
Its happened 3 times now. Always at exactly midnight. 21.09, 25.09
and 26.09.
We have VM Ware Server as the hardware - could this cause the problem?
ng another version with changes that will
either fix the problem (we hope) or yield some more information about
what is going on.
-=bill
Alexey Solofnenko wrote:
Everything is possible, but unlikely. Please try running server stack
trace from
http://tmitevski.users.mcs2.netarray.com/stac
Everything is possible, but unlikely. Please try running server stack
trace from
http://tmitevski.users.mcs2.netarray.com/stacktrace/app/launch.jnlp to
get a thread dump. It will show the list of threads and what locks they
have acquired and what locks they are waiting for.
- Alexey.
Wm.A.St
I do not know the answer. A similar behaviour happened with our servers
when finilizer dead-locked. In your case Finilizer did not dead-lock,
but it fails with exception and I do not know if it recovers after that.
Try checking stack trace several times in a row and see what the
finilizer does.
russ/strace.
same problem if I call java directly - okay it does not log to
catalina.out but to stdout...
Somewhere the road while watching the truss output the open-syscalls use
the wrong/truncated directory.
thanks and kind regards,
Markus
Alexey Solofnenko wrote:
Try running "bash
Try running "bash -x catalina.sh run" to see if Java is started
correctly. If it is not, try running the same command from a normal
directory, and run the same command yourself without using scripts
provided with Tomcat.
- Alexey.
Markus Schiegl wrote:
Hi,
you're right about # as a special
Are you allowed to create symbolic links with normal names?
- Alexey.
Markus Schiegl wrote:
Hi there,
starting Tomcat from a path containing a pound sign (#) somewhere
results in a ClassNotFoundException.
I've checked this with
- Solaris Sparc/X86 + Mac OS X
- Java 5 + 6
- Tomcat 5.5.23 + 6.0
There can be hidden dependencies on native code. For example, JDBC
drivers (OCI, ...). Fortunately there are usually corresponding 64 bit
libraries available - you just need to update PATH or LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
- Alexey.
Andrew Miehs wrote:
On 31/07/2007, at 2:04 PM, Mohan2005 wrote:
so no
without requiring much more memory. But unlike [most] web
applications we have a lot of long lived objects and maybe
synchronization issues are the major factor in our case. That is why I
say that only performance tests can say for sure.
- Alexey.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Alexey
being misled by foolishness.
Ron
Joe Nathan wrote:
Alexey Solofnenko-2 wrote:
No, each of two 4GB processes will have only a half of the objects
under the same load. And I heard that GC does not scale linear with
heap size. And this is without multi-threading performance
considerations. As
.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Alexey Solofnenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat with 8 GB memory
I was under impression that GC does not scale linearly. That
means one 8GB process will be slower than two 4GB processes.
Not true. The time of a full GC using modern algorithms
I was under impression that GC does not scale linearly. That means one
8GB process will be slower than two 4GB processes. There are other
considerations too: multi-threading - global locks will lock less
threads (maybe in GC, heap, application logic, ...), but cluster
overhead may be noticeable
16 matches
Mail list logo