Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Lars Nielsen Lind
Solved with mod_jk without JNI, and thanks for all the tips. In my /etc/hosts there was this line: ::1 localhost.localdomain localhost And I added this line: 127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost and now I can ping localhost. Christopher Schultz skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Michael, I didn't want to shoot at you, and yes, mod_jk documentation could be much better. Concerning the docs: Documentation contribution will be welcome. We try to add all new things in there, but parts of the documentation are indeed rudimentary. Concerning Apache 2.2: There is no

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All I can say is that I googled around extensively, trying to learn how to set up Tomcat 5.5 with Apache 2.2 as the front end, and found many sites saying to stay away from mod_jk, along with mailing list

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Joe Riopel
I am not saying this is 100% correct, or the best documentation ever but I wrote a small install guide for Apache 2.2 and Tomcat 5.5 with mod_jk. I used the same steps on a RH7.3 box and a Slackware 10.2 box. http://www.crankhouse.com/howto.php?f=modjk On 11/16/06, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 16, 2006, at 9:13 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi Michael, I didn't want to shoot at you, and yes, mod_jk documentation could be much better. Assuming it's up to date :) - To start a new topic, e-mail:

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Nov 15, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy? If you want to use mod_proxy, it is important to know, that most documentation for mod_proxy_balancer is contained in apaches

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread michael
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 03:13:48PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: I didn't want to shoot at you, and yes, mod_jk documentation could be much better. Concerning the docs: Documentation contribution will be welcome. We try to add all new things in there, but parts of the documentation are

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread Rainer Jung
Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy? If you want to use mod_proxy, it is important to know, that most documentation for mod_proxy_balancer is contained in apaches documentation page for mod_proxy, not on the page for mod_proxy_balancer :) My

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-16 Thread michael
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 05:03:29PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: It's not the right list to discuss, but: As a user I would expect configuration info for load-balancing with mod_proxy_balancer on the mod_proxy_balancer page. The fact, that all configurations for the proxy balancer are done by

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Lars, Lars Nielsen Lind schrieb: I have tried with mod_jk but can't make it work. I get this err msg in mod_jk.log: [Wed Nov 15 00:32:34 2006] [16667:10448] [error] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (1931): can't resolve tomcat address localhost mod_jk can not resolve the host name

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lars, Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: I have tried with mod_jk but can't make it work. I get this err msg in mod_jk.log: [Wed Nov 15 00:32:34 2006] [16667:10448] [error] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (1931): can't resolve tomcat address localhost

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread Lars Nielsen Lind
I will reply later tonight. I need to sleep. Worked all night with the problems and have been working today also :-) Christopher Schultz skrev: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lars, Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: I have tried with mod_jk but can't make it work. I get this err msg

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread michael
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:22:02AM +0100, Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: Which connector is the most relevant to use with Apache 2.2.3 and Tomcat 5.5.20? Is it mod_jk or is it proxy? And how do I use the most relevant with Apache 2.2.3 and Tomcat 5.5.20? (compile and implementation samples

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread Rainer Jung
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:22:02AM +0100, Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: Everything I have read says that mod_jk will not work with 2.2. What little information is available says use the proxy modules. There is no known problem concerniong usage of mod_jk in combination

RE: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-15 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Rainer Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy? If you want to use mod_proxy, it is important to know, that most documentation for mod_proxy_balancer is contained in apaches documentation page for mod_proxy, not on the page

Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-14 Thread Lars Nielsen Lind
Hi! Which connector is the most relevant to use with Apache 2.2.3 and Tomcat 5.5.20? Is it mod_jk or is it proxy? And how do I use the most relevant with Apache 2.2.3 and Tomcat 5.5.20? (compile and implementation samples wanted if possible). Thanks, Lars Nielsen Lind

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-14 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lars, Lars Nielsen Lind wrote: Which connector is the most relevant to use with Apache 2.2.3 and Tomcat 5.5.20? Is it mod_jk or is it proxy? It depends on who you are, really. You may use either mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp to connect Apache httpd 2.2

Re: Apache 2.2.3 Tomcat 5.5.20 - mod_jk or proxy?

2006-11-14 Thread Lars Nielsen Lind
I have tried with mod_jk but can't make it work. I get this err msg in mod_jk.log: [Wed Nov 15 00:32:34 2006] [16667:10448] [error] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c (1931): can't resolve tomcat address localhost [Wed Nov 15 00:32:34 2006] [16667:10448] [error] ajp_validate::jk_ajp_common.c