Mark Deneen wrote:
Since we're all giving mod_jk a big hug here I thought I would point
out that I had issues with both mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp which
were solved by moving (back) to mod_jk.
Intermittently the response to the browser would be sent as plain-text
(the browser just prints
I've had it happen in both Internet Explorer and Firefox. Personally
I've only seen it in Firefox, but users had been complaining about the
issue... and they are only using IE.
Mark
On 7/22/07, Pid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Deneen wrote:
Since we're all giving mod_jk a big hug here I
Johnny Kewl wrote:
Mladen you very modest... your mod_jk is great.
LOL. It's not mine, not at all!
Mladen, if you retire, elope or die, send me an email, I'll look at
mod_proxy ;)
Don't worry, there are many other folks actively developing
mod_jk like Bill, Henri, Jean-Frederic, Mark,
Since we're all giving mod_jk a big hug here I thought I would point
out that I had issues with both mod_proxy_http and mod_proxy_ajp which
were solved by moving (back) to mod_jk.
Intermittently the response to the browser would be sent as plain-text
(the browser just prints out the html) or I
Hello all,
I've found a page (http://www.apachetutor.org/admin/reverseproxies) which
states that by now, reverse proxying is the preferred way to deploy Tomcat
applications, replacing the old mod_jk.
But I see that mod_jk is still being updated.
Which way is the better one?
Do you know of
Marcus Schmidke wrote:
But I see that mod_jk is still being updated.
Yes as well as mod_proxy.
Which way is the better one?
It all depends on your topology and needs
Do you know of any other documents or information which can help me make a
decision which is the best way for me? Any
Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk vs. reverse proxy
Marcus Schmidke wrote:
But I see that mod_jk is still being updated.
Yes as well as mod_proxy.
Which way is the better one?
It all depends on your topology and needs
Do you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
Mladen Turk wrote:
Which way is the better one [between mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp]?
It all depends on your topology and needs
For instance, I have a complex configuration where some URLs must map to
one worker, while other URLs map to
Which way is the better one [between mod_jk and mod_proxy_ajp]?
I will second mod_jk too...i had to encrypt the data communication between
my apache and tomcat server and using stunnel with mod_jk was so cool and so
easymuch less then configuring https on mod_proxy
On 7/19/07,
@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk vs. reverse proxy
Marcus Schmidke wrote:
But I see that mod_jk is still being updated.
Yes as well as mod_proxy.
Which way is the better one?
It all depends on your topology and needs
Do you know of any other documents
10 matches
Mail list logo
