Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-16 Thread Taylan Develioglu
/apr data lost in http post request? Can MSIE even control which data goes in which packet? TCP/IP APIs on most platforms allow the Nagle algorithm to be disabled, which will cause data to be sent out on each call. Most TCP/IP stacks also set the push flag on the last packet

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-16 Thread Taylan Develioglu
Hi Chris, Raising the keepalive-timeout value on the connector definitely improves the situation. From what I've gathered from what people posted here (thanks guys) and dumping packets I believe the situation to be somewhat as follows: With nagle's off, IE sends out the http request in two

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-16 Thread Taylan Develioglu
Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylan, No, you'd need to modify the source. It's not particularly useful in most scenarios to intentionally stall an HTTP conversation, so it's not a built-in feature :) No, I'm saying that you should send

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-16 Thread André Warnier
Taylan Develioglu wrote: Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylan, No, you'd need to modify the source. It's not particularly useful in most scenarios to intentionally stall an HTTP conversation, so it's not a built-in feature :) No, I'm saying that

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-16 Thread Taylan Develioglu
Hi Andre, I meant to stop writing, not closing the socket. Poor choice of words, apologies. André Warnier wrote: Taylan Develioglu wrote: Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylan, No, you'd need to modify the source. It's not particularly useful

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-12 Thread Oliver Schoett
Christopher Schultz wrote: Can MSIE even control which data goes in which packet? That would seem to be part of the TCP/IP stack, buried in the OS, and affecting both MSIE and any other browser on the same system. We saw that Firefox uses only one packet to send a POST request (of

RE: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-12 Thread Martin Gainty
distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission. To: users@tomcat.apache.org From: oliver.scho...@capgemini-sdm.com Subject: Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request? Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:55:04

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-11 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oliver, On 3/10/2009 2:41 PM, Oliver Schoett wrote: As far as I know, splitting header and body of POST requests into separate TCP packets is a peculiarity of IE browsers. This observation was made using normal HTML forms, but it may well apply

RE: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-11 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net] Subject: Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request? Can MSIE even control which data goes in which packet? TCP/IP APIs on most platforms allow the Nagle algorithm to be disabled, which will cause data to be sent out

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-10 Thread Oliver Schoett
Taylan Develioglu wrote: I would like to correct this, it seems to only happen with IE6/7.. maybe old firefox 2.0 We recently observed a similar problem. When IE 6/7/8 make a form POST, they often send the header in one TCP packet and the body in another. A flaky networking component

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylan, On 3/5/2009 5:45 AM, Taylan Develioglu wrote: Can the wget clone do this without modification, or do I need to change it? No, you'd need to modify the source. It's not particularly useful in most scenarios to intentionally stall an HTTP

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-09 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taylan, On 3/6/2009 4:05 AM, Taylan Develioglu wrote: James, thank you very much. I suspected IE to be guilty because it was happening only with IE clients. Chris, I guess we don't need to try and reproduce this anymore now we know the

Re: tomcat w/apr data lost in http post request?

2009-03-03 Thread Taylan Develioglu
I would like to correct this, it seems to only happen with IE6/7.. maybe old firefox 2.0 It happens with different clients indeed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands,