Try running mvn compile or mvn install in another window.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:19 AM, shrimpywu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi, what do u mean by "hot code replace"??
>
> every time i run i app,
> i always do
> mvn clean jetty:run,
>
> but everytime after jetty was started, any html page i
hi, what do u mean by "hot code replace"??
every time i run i app,
i always do
mvn clean jetty:run,
but everytime after jetty was started, any html page i modified,
it won`t show the change until i manually copy and replace the html
page from src folder to target folder,
and my project, i do usi
Hi David
I think you could just use
response.sendRedirect() and request.forward() , rest of the code should
still be processed.. But are you expecting the user to return from the
servlet?
David Leangen wrote:
Hi!
What's a clean way to forward a request to another existent non-Wicket
servle
Baah.. Theres already something on it:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sf.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-hibernate-behavior/
something on it here:
http://jroller.com/wireframe/entry/hibernate_annotations_and_wicket
Anything else for the wish list not already existing? :)
Nino Saturnino
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jörn Zaefferer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, then I add: Annotations for form validation. Maybe integrated
> with the bean validation JSR, Hibernate Validation or standalone.
> Enabled by adding AnnotationValidator instance to a form or indivdual
> fields...
Great:)
First shot will probably be Hibernate Validation (is general and works
without hibernate with any JPA provider), since I have a demo project
for that, validation JSR 303 arent done yet AFAIK.. And I think im gonna
try to use IVisitor to do it.. So it's actually a fairly simple one:)
It's fine here I think..
BTW just got the internal error page from your application, so could not
checkout your problem... No messages, so must mean you are deploying in
production mode..
insom wrote:
I see what you're seeing in Firefox. I didn't clarify that the user who
submitted the issu
I see what you're seeing in Firefox. I didn't clarify that the user who
submitted the issue was using IE7, which is where I got the results
explained previously. It seems that if I use a shortcut to the URL, or if I
open a new IE window while logged in, it will find the existing cookie.
Otherwise,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:45 AM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I figured it out. If you login to the site, then open another window and
> visit to the site you will have to login again. But if you login to the
> site, then open a shortcut in a new window that goes directly to
> http://www.f
I figured it out. If you login to the site, then open another window and
visit to the site you will have to login again. But if you login to the
site, then open a shortcut in a new window that goes directly to
http://www.foodhandler.org, you will be already logged in.
I have no idea why opening a
It turns out she did have another browser window open. I witnessed the issue
on her machine, but I haven't been able to replicate it on my own. I've
tried visiting the website, logging in, opening another browser window, then
closing either the new or the old window (I've tried both ways), reopeni
Theres even the blog tutorial thing I did once aswell, although
discontinued (as I thought no one used it)...
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/blog-tutorial.html
Gwyn Evans wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/documentation-index.html#DocumentationIndex-Codeasdocumentation
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008
Either the browser doesn't kill cookie on close or she has cookies disabled,
had url with session id encoded and returned back to that url while the
session was still active server side.
-Matej
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:34 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Are they closing all instanc
Are they closing all instances of the browser?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 3:30 PM, insom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how a browser would find a pre-existing session after being
> closed and reopened? I got a call from a user today who is able to stay
> logged in, even after she cl
Does anyone know how a browser would find a pre-existing session after being
closed and reopened? I got a call from a user today who is able to stay
logged in, even after she closes her browser.
I had thought that closing a browser essentially destroys that user's
session (at least from the clien
Thanks for inspiration, igor. :)
Well, it would not help the mentioned problem of not being able to change
the style of an element depending on its child elements. However, as I
thought about this, I realized that I could do some global changes in the
weird templates and stylesheets I got, so CSS
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/documentation-index.html#DocumentationIndex-Codeasdocumentation
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Eelco Hillenius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Phonebook has db access. And one of the examples that come with Wicket
> In Action has that too.
>
> Eelco
>
> On Fri, Sep 19
Ryan,
Here is how I do this with Spring:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2008/08/java-transaction-boundary-tricks.html
Its not as pretty as Salve's @Transactional but just as effective.
Regards,
Erik.
Ryan wrote:
Aside from these ideas, has anyone used a different method for starti
setdefaultbeforedisabledlink("") will do what you want
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:27 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> setDefault*DisabledLink?
> I know them and I am using them, as I already wrote.
>
> Just considered it would be nice to have setDefaultDisabledLinkBehavior,
> too
setDefault*DisabledLink?
I know them and I am using them, as I already wrote.
Just considered it would be nice to have setDefaultDisabledLinkBehavior,
too. And that I think it would be more obvious to have this applied by
default.
Was just a proposal, never mind.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> app
application.getmarkupsettings()
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:15 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> would you mind giving a hint?
>
>
> igor.vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:24 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Of course, you are right. Sorry, what I wrote
would you mind giving a hint?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:24 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Of course, you are right. Sorry, what I wrote was not completely clear.
>> It can make sense to change the markup in order to disable a link.
>> It definitely makes
thanks a lot ... very simple
Murilo Aguiar
2008/9/19 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> use forCss(TemplatePage.class, "template.css")
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Murilo Aguiar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What is wrong with my CSS???
> >
> > *TemplatePage.java
> >
> >
Phonebook has db access. And one of the examples that come with Wicket
In Action has that too.
Eelco
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But none with database access ?
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
>> Von: Mic
see wicket-phonebook in wicket-stuff svn
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But none with database access ?
>
> Original-Nachricht
>> Datum: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
>> Von: Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> An: users@wicket.ap
But none with database access ?
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Von: Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: users@wicket.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Wicket sample application
>
> just go a click further and you'll find plenty
> http://www.wic
create a jira issue for this
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Joel Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing some component-based authorization and I'm trying to disable an
> entire RadioGroup without having to tie the authorization to each individual
> Radio button. Were I to directly
use forCss(TemplatePage.class, "template.css")
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Murilo Aguiar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is wrong with my CSS???
>
> *TemplatePage.java
>
>public TemplatePage(){
>add(HeaderContributor.forCss("template.css"));*
>
> In the browser
>
> *
>
What is wrong with my CSS???
*TemplatePage.java
public TemplatePage(){
add(HeaderContributor.forCss("template.css"));*
In the browser
*
SisWicket 0.1 testKiller
*File template.css is in the same package of file TemplatePage.java*
*
it is necessary plus some code?
I know
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:24 AM, pixologe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Of course, you are right. Sorry, what I wrote was not completely clear.
> It can make sense to change the markup in order to disable a link.
> It definitely makes sense to exchange [a] with [span], yes.
>
> I was merely target
Yeah.. It's good:)
What about covering the stuff WIA drags you through, that should be good
enough for a brown belt:)
James Carman wrote:
I didn't mean to offend. I was being facetious. I think it's a great
idea to have different levels.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Eyal Golan <[EMAI
Of course, you are right. Sorry, what I wrote was not completely clear.
It can make sense to change the markup in order to disable a link.
It definitely makes sense to exchange [a] with [span], yes.
I was merely targeting at the appearance part: I think that adding markup
between this [span] elem
I didn't mean to offend. I was being facetious. I think it's a great
idea to have different levels.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Eyal Golan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People,
> it just a first draft.
> As you saw in the first post, I just wanted to add questions for a Wicket
> exam, and n
People,
it just a first draft.
As you saw in the first post, I just wanted to add questions for a Wicket
exam, and notified that there isn't.
Maybe it's possible to create a basic exam and a more advanced one?
I think we can all contribute.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 6:11 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PR
I think I´m gonna use scriptaculous.
It´s much more easier to use it and I guess you can also compress the js
files as mootools does.
Scriptaculous provides almost that much effects as mootools.
JQuery is very poor on effects...
Nino.Martinez wrote:
>
>
>
> Agent Mahone wrote:
>> O, thank u
Perhaps it could be for a yellow belt. ;)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> It looks fairly "simple", I guess it depends on the depth of the exam...
> Because it could go over a lot more, or maybe the points could specified
Hi
It looks fairly "simple", I guess it depends on the depth of the exam...
Because it could go over a lot more, or maybe the points could specified
to further detail as you write.
Eyal Golan wrote:
Hi,
I have proposed to open a Wicket exam in JavaBlackBelt.
Here's my proposal:
http://www.j
you dont have to roll your own security, just where wicket looks for the key :)
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, but why bother when its already implemented? Security-related
> stuff isn't exactly the right place to "roll your own".
>
> Jörn
Sure, but why bother when its already implemented? Security-related
stuff isn't exactly the right place to "roll your own".
Jörn
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that is trivial to implement with 1.3.4 also
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM,
disabled is more then just about the appearance, if something is
disabled the user should not be able to interact with it. for example,
security strategy can disable links the user does not have access to.
just adding class="disabled" leaves the link clickable.
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:21
that is trivial to implement with 1.3.4 also
-igor
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Jörn Zaefferer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though afaik the URL encryption will be even better with 1.3.5, where
> the encryption key is session-based, that is, per user, instead of one
> default key for everyth
I'm doing some component-based authorization and I'm trying to disable an
entire RadioGroup without having to tie the authorization to each individual
Radio button. Were I to directly disable the RadioGroup, it looks like the
Radio buttons would also disable (but I haven't tested this); but it
Hi,
I have proposed to open a Wicket exam in JavaBlackBelt.
Here's my proposal:
http://www.javablackbelt.com/forum/posts/list/0/118.page#567
Please check it and give your thoughts.
I have already written several questions (to myself).
Thanks
--
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit: http://jvdrum
Oops, I missed that bit!
Well, then I add: Annotations for form validation. Maybe integrated
with the bean validation JSR, Hibernate Validation or standalone.
Enabled by adding AnnotationValidator instance to a form or indivdual
fields...
Jörn
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Nino Saturnino Mart
Hi Richard,
that seems a very good idea, thank you, didn´t come into my mind... *d0h* ;)
Regards
Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: richardwilko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 19. September 2008 15:17
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Ajax-only-Form?
In that
In that case use an ajax submit link rather than a button (which uses a href
and an onclick), with no button in the form.
However I dont think this will stop the enter key from submitting the
form...
You could also try lazy loading the form with ajax, that way you can be sure
that if they see th
Hi Richard,
thank you for your answer. But my Problem is, I want to "cut out" the people
with JavaScript deactivated because they cannot use the
GoogleMaps-functionality, what makes it kinda useless to submit the form.
Your prototype-approach won´t work that way.
Perhaps I only add a warning-div
So if im understanding correctly your form is submitting in the non-ajax
standard way when you press return on the input field?
If so then this is my solution:
http://www.richard-wilkinson.co.uk/2008/04/05/how-to-stop-non-ajax-form-submits-in-wicket/
Hope it helps,
Richard
Markus-66 wrote:
Actually that is what I do. That's what I meant when I said "implement own
version"... Basically it extends AjaxFallbackLink overriding onBeforeRender
to add a Modifier dependent on the enabled property.
Just wanted to point out that this is the behavior I would have expected by
default, instead
Why not just use an attribute modifier?
pixologe wrote:
Dear Wicket devs,
I propose that by default a disabled link should rather (or also) be marked
using a behavior, instead of adding markup before and after.
A word in advance: I know that I can implement my own version of Link which
adds be
wicketstuff!=wicket :)
And it should not go on the wicket wiki...
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Don't we have already at least one wishlist on the wicket wiki?
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/#Index-WishListforNextVersion
Jörn
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EM
Don't we have already at least one wishlist on the wicket wiki?
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/#Index-WishListforNextVersion
Jörn
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd really like a wish list for wicketstuff. So reply with y
Agent Mahone wrote:
O, thank u very much for ur comments.
I have some questions to you:
1. What is the package mini under contribution package for?
What is the difference to package contribution/wicket-mootools???
Im not sure how well managed wicket-mootools are...
2. I also noticed
Dear Wicket devs,
I propose that by default a disabled link should rather (or also) be marked
using a behavior, instead of adding markup before and after.
A word in advance: I know that I can implement my own version of Link which
adds behavior in case of being disabled, and I know how to do it
Since it's International Talk Like a Pirate Day:
A pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel hanging out his
zipper. The bartender says "hey, buddy, did you know you've got a
steering wheel hanging out your zipper?" The pirate says "A! And
it's drivin' me nuts"
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> aspectj is pretty cool, but its expression language is somewhat
> limited. for example salve allows
>
> public void somefunction(@NotNull Integer a, @NotEmpty String b) {}
>
> aspectj, at least when i started salve, did no
Hi
I'd really like a wish list for wicketstuff. So reply with your wishes
and I might have time at a point to implement it:)
I'll start by adding this to the list:
Integration with : http://code.google.com/p/iui/
I'll add a wishlist to the wiki or maybe my blog..
--
-Wicket for love
Nino
Hi all,
I have an issue with a Form I want only to be available to users with
Javascript turned on, so I used a AjaxButton, and set DefaultButton to the
AjaxButton.
But the Form still submits using 'Return' - rendering the Body only also
kills the AjaxButton. Can anyone help me how to achiev
Wicket in Action is out, the open issues for 1.4 are constantly decreasing. Is
a 1.4M4 in sight?
Stefan
Damn, you be starboard! Removin' t' only known unserializable booty
from me base page class immediately solved t' problem. I bow before
your mightyness, captain!
Kristof Threapwood
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Martijn Dashorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Avast! Did ye check furr t' nasty se
Avast! Did ye check furr t' nasty serialization errs? Them could sink
a mighty ship and cause them pesky expiration pages.
Capt'n McDasmans
(t'is Internation'l Talk Like a pirate day t'day matey!)
http://talklikeapirate.com
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Kristof Jozsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
Hi,
I'd love to use setResponsePage(Page) (so redirecting to a concrete
page instance instead of a page class) on handling standard (non-ajax)
links in my application. I found it very handy to use the actual model
objects in their current state, instantiate the new page object
passing the current
Hi All,
Before I go and write my own component to change the src of an img
onouseover, I just wanted to make sure that there is no standard
component. I don't want to re-invent the wheel.
Is there a standard component for changing the Image or ImageButton image
onmouseover?
Thanks,
Tim
--
Damn it works. Sorry for bothering the list. I probably tried to many things
last night.
Well thanks for the help :)
2008/9/19 Murat Yücel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have set the flag but it still doesnt work. Can you confirmed this on
> your side?
>
> /Murat
>
> 2008/9/19 Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PRO
Though afaik the URL encryption will be even better with 1.3.5, where
the encryption key is session-based, that is, per user, instead of one
default key for everything (current 1.3.4 behaviour).
Once that is released, you get unique-per-user URLs which provide
perfect protection against CSRF witho
I have set the flag but it still doesnt work. Can you confirmed this on your
side?
/Murat
2008/9/19 Michael Sparer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> setEscapeModelStrings to false on your component (e.g. Label) and it should
> work
>
>
> Murat Yücel-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > First of all i am using
setEscapeModelStrings to false on your component (e.g. Label) and it should
work
Murat Yücel-2 wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> First of all i am using wicket 1.3.4. I have a problem with not being able
> to show html characters when using
> StringResourceModel together with xml property file. Xml proper
Hi All
First of all i am using wicket 1.3.4. I have a problem with not being able
to show html characters when using
StringResourceModel together with xml property file. Xml property file
doesnt support html tags because it
not valid in an xml file. I have tried to escape the "<" tag but then i wi
68 matches
Mail list logo
