callbackFunction =
getCallbackFunction(**parameters);
This definitely does an ajax call. I haven't looked closely at the
Wicket.Ajax.ajax() code, but it works fine.
Bertrand
On 19/07/2013 9:58 AM, Frank van Lankvelt wrote:
hi all,
in the process of upgrading to wicket 6, I
hi all,
in the process of upgrading to wicket 6, I have to do some wicket ajax
calls from custom javascript callbacks. The AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior
seems to provide a bunch of tools to help me out. But I cannot make sense
of the javadoc ( implementation) of #getCallbackFunction:
*
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
While we strive to keep binary compatibility between minor releases,
i.e. the z releases of an x.y.z release path, sometimes things slip
by. In principle we only allow security or blocker issues to break the
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Antoine van Wel
antoine.van@gmail.comwrote:
Since you can't always have what you want..
Is there any PHP framework out there which comes even close to Wicket;
component based, strict separation between HTML and programming,
stateful, out-of-the-box Ajax
I'm regularly running into problems when integrating client-side ajax code.
The issue is that the client-side code is doing throttled asynchronous
calls to wicket ajax behaviors.
Now, this generally works fine until I want to integrate this with native
wicket calls (links, buttons). Then, such
, Frank
Op 18 jan. 2011 om 01:35 heeft Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
het volgende geschreven:
can you do the flushing yourself by registering a
wicket.ajax.pre-call-handler?
-igor
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
I'm regularly
in the process of expanding the number of languages my wicket
application is available in, I'm running into the question of tracking
properties files.
In particular, I want to be able to get some kind of feedback about
missing translations; mismatches between property files would be
sufficient.
of IDE.
Peter
On 3 December 2010 09:40, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.comwrote:
in the process of expanding the number of languages my wicket
application is available in, I'm running into the question of tracking
properties files.
In particular, I want to be able to get some
wouldn't you be better off wrapping your model/dataprovider in a
filter that does the processing that's required?
That way, you can keep populating the views simple, without even
needing to use setVisible.
cheers, Frank
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 4:34 PM, MattyDE ufer.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
is the
preferred way to do this and you can set it yourself i you need or use
wicket's ajax js to perform the request - which will set it for you.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
well, the two kinds of ajax requests differ
2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.comwrote:
so why is there the non-ajax request?
once the page is loaded everything else - communication with ext -
should be happening via ajax requests...
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv
In my attempts to integrate a javascript client-side framework (ext-js) to
wicket, I'm running into the problem that the client-side framework expects
URLs to send requests to, expecting a JSON/XML response. This is of course
perfectly natural behavior for a js framework.
The documentation I
...@gmail.comwrote:
did you check why it returns false? ajax requests should not increment
the page version, so they should always be current. people have
built extjs integrations before, you may look into one of those for
hints.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Frank van Lankvelt
I'm in the process of integrating Ext-JS into our Wicket application. So
there are a number of questions, such as:
What are your experiences of using wicket and ext together?
Do these projects help at all, or do you rather roll a custom behavior each
time?
Is there some project that is not
I haven't; the main reason being that we are using Ext-JS for another
application we're developing and we'ld like to limit the number of
technologies in our stack. We are already using a mix of custom developed
javascript functionality and some standard YUI 2 components.
A major motivation for
a simple textField.add(new
ExtBaloonBehavior(model)). Why would you need a custom TextField for
that?
Good luck for your integration effort and, should you decide to build
on top of wicket-ext, feel free to ask.
Cheers,
Fabio Fioretti
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Frank van
Hi all,
hoping to get some debugging tips on a concurrency issue I've run into.
What we're seeing is concurrent access to a Page instance, when our
application is under a lot of stress.
The backend is taking a lot of time, which should be handled by Wicket by
locking on the pagemap. This is
, Apr 28, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Frank van Lankvelt
f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
Hi all,
hoping to get some debugging tips on a concurrency issue I've run into.
What we're seeing is concurrent access to a Page instance, when our
application is under a lot of stress.
The backend
we've been developing a wicket application for some time now, where
the client keeps pushing for more and more fancy UI components.
We've been building some of them by hand, including browser version
checks, and have some code to enable YUI widgets.
This is a costly business where we are severely
of the session?
On 25/01/2009, Frank van Lankvelt f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
But how is a view to know if its model (object) has changed in the
pull model? One way that I see this working is if views
extract all
state that they need to do the rendering into a separate
object
:
Use weakreferences to hold onto pages instead.
-igor
On 1/24/09, Frank van Lankvelt f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com wrote:
I'm trying to get a page to observe a business object that
can send
events. The changes don't warrant a full page refresh, so
I want to
update only those parts
I'm trying to get a page to observe a business object that can send
events. The changes don't warrant a full page refresh, so I want to
update only those parts of the page that have changed as a result of the
events.
I've seen wicketstuff-push, where a similar kind of observation is
present in
CMS or Hippo Portal?
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:12:13 +0100
Von: Frank van Lankvelt f.vanlankv...@onehippo.com
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Things I miss in Wicket
Sure these kinds of things exist. In Hippo CMS 7, we're nesting panels
Sure these kinds of things exist. In Hippo CMS 7, we're nesting panels
that each have their own instance-specific configuration. Different
document types have a corresponding (admittedly quite simple) plugin
configuration that can be edited within the cms. The cms itself is
mostly a (more
Brix
Jackrabbit
Our application will need some heavy duty CMS features, and
this project looks powerful enough to do the job. Jackrabbit
is used by Brix to store content.
Alternatively, you could try Hippo CMS7. It's also built with Wicket on
top of a JCR repository, but with some
According to a conversation I had with Johan, only the last shown page
is kept in memory. Earlier versions are written to disk.
When using ajax, the page does not have to be actually written to disk
as you cannot reach the previous state by using the back button. When
using a BookmarkableLink,
You could have a look at the broadcaster that is discussed in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1312
The solution that is proposed there uses a visitor instead of
registration. That has the advantage that you don't have to
_unregister_ at the appropriate time. Because Wicket does not
Hi,
that is correct, Hippo CMS 7 should be ready for release in a few months
time. It is a rewrite where the CMS itself is implemented in Wicket.
plug shameless=true
The repository is a JCR (JackRabbit) repository extended with workflow
and faceted navigation. The CMS is composed as a set of
Hi Uwe,
plug shameless=true
The repository is a JCR (JackRabbit) repository extended with workflow
and faceted navigation. The CMS is composed as a set of plugins. These
Wicket components can be configured and that can be dynamically swapped
in and out of the application. We use
Hi,
please excuse my newbie question; is it correct that pages cannot share
objects? (any pointers on the subject of wickets serialization would be
greatly appreciated)
I want to provide some feedback to the main page from a modal-window,
and now do this by putting meta-data in the session. Is
Assuming B has a reference to Page A, wont A be Serialized with B,
when you go to C, and both still share the same serialized object?
When B is serialized, so is A, and serialization makes sure the
instances to your object are kept shared
how can this be? Aren't different pages
ok, I'll go ahead with storing the object in the session directly (as
meta-data) and use models in the pages to access this object.
May I ask what your use case is?
it's very simple; when carrying out an action on page A, I want to
display a modal window (are you sure? with ok/cancel). The
32 matches
Mail list logo
