On 20 February 2013 17:54, Stephen Walsh step...@connectwithawalsh.comwrote:
I definitely like the look and feel of IDEA better, but time will tell if
it's more productive. It will certainly take the full 30 day trial
period to evaluate whether it's worth the cost.
Don't forget that they
The only caveat to my development is that It will be commercial. I tried
the community edition and it worked for my basic wicket dev, but the
integration with JBoss in the commercial edition is *extremely* helpful. I
could do all of it in the comman line, but I like one stop shop tools. I
haven't
I abandoned Eclipse for IntelliJ after using it for almost 10 years
because of Maven. Since then I have become a big Idea-Fan :)
Working with Wicket using the community edition (the free one) is no
problem at all as you can use the Maven-Jetty-PlugIn. I did that for
quite a while.
I only switched
to
use Eclipse so I know Eclipse as well. My opinion: The gain in pleasure is
worth way more then 10 minutes a day. It is unpayable :-)
-
--
Regards,
Hans
http://cantaa.de
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Eclipse-or-IntelliJ-tp4656571p4656591
through intellij.
Simon
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Eclipse-or-IntelliJ-tp4656571p4656600.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e
If you do software development for a living (as opposed to a hobby), one
thing to consider is what tools are used at prospective employers. I work
at a large (40,000+) company where Eclipse is the standard tool. Partly
because it's open source (read free, no budget impact) has such a
large
My main problem with Eclipse was that it mixes the classpaths for main and
test.
If you have separate config files in the test classpath some weird things
may happen.
There is a ticket about this since March 2008:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=224708 and it says we need
someone to
I've always used Eclipse and am currently using Juno. The Maven support got
much better, but other stupid things seem to have broke. For example,
switching tabs into the XML editor (or pom editor) seems to require
calculating Pi to 10 million digits each time. Actually, I think there is a
memory
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:29 PM, William Speirs wspe...@apache.org wrote:
I've always used Eclipse and am currently using Juno. The Maven support got
much better, but other stupid things seem to have broke. For example,
switching tabs into the XML editor (or pom editor) seems to require
Personally I've been using IDEA since version 11, always on Linux, and
from my view it's on the contrary quite faster than Eclipse, with a
maven support that is not riddled with bugs.
Version 11 was as far as I'm concerned actually much cleaner and nicer
than Eclipse ever was, and with
I don't really like forcing people to use a specific IDE. We keep our
stuff IDE-agnostic as far as possible.
That said:
I have about 50 lines of code in my current multimodule project in Idea 12.
No slow down or any other problems ;)
But I have to say: Idea 10 was a horrible failure.
On Wed,
My IDE of choice is NetBeans. Tried all three. Not sure about current
IDEA, but when I tried, it sucked about the same as Eclipse.
my2c
On 02/19/2013 10:17 PM, Stephen Walsh wrote:
Who uses what and why?
I've only ever used Eclipse, but I discovered IntelliJ earlier this week
and it's so
Select this repository: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.2
Expand Juno SR1 Patches and install Eclipse UI Juno SR1 Optimizations
Have a nice day,
Bertrand
p.s. I use Eclipse Juno. Tried Intellij 12 for a week but didn't like
it... It was a constant battle to get my project working
(September 2012)
Invoke Help Install New Software
Select this repository: http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.2
Expand Juno SR1 Patches and install Eclipse UI Juno SR1 Optimizations
Have a nice day,
Bertrand
p.s. I use Eclipse Juno. Tried Intellij 12 for a week but didn't like
Juno SR1 Optimizations
Have a nice day,
Bertrand
p.s. I use Eclipse Juno. Tried Intellij 12 for a week but didn't like it...
It was a constant battle to get my project working.
On 20/02/2013 9:29 AM, William Speirs wrote:
I've always used Eclipse and am currently using Juno. The Maven support
Software
Select this repository: http://download.eclipse.org/**
eclipse/updates/4.2 http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.2
Expand Juno SR1 Patches and install Eclipse UI Juno SR1 Optimizations
Have a nice day,
Bertrand
p.s. I use Eclipse Juno. Tried Intellij 12 for a week but didn't like
Who uses what and why?
I've only ever used Eclipse, but I discovered IntelliJ earlier this week
and it's so different. Just wondering pros and cons on each.
Thanks!
___
Stephen Walsh | http://connectwithawalsh.com
At SRMvision we use exclusively IntelliJ for developping. Its excellent
Maven support, smart completion and robustness made us forget eclipse very
quickly.
Le 19 févr. 2013 22:18, Stephen Walsh step...@connectwithawalsh.com a
écrit :
Who uses what and why?
I've only ever used Eclipse, but I
Hi;
You use one of them and you feel like you are missing something? No you are
not. The one you are most familiar with is the best.
I use intellij ...
This discussion might also give you what you are looking for.
That's what I'm hoping for. IntelliJ looks a lot more polished especially
for the Mac.
Eclipse is crippling at times because it is so slow. Just sort of getting
a feel for the Wicket community and what people like best.
___
Stephen Walsh |
You have a mac ?
Choose the best tool !
Choose Intellij !
François Meillet
Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
Le 19 févr. 2013 à 23:06, Stephen Walsh step...@connectwithawalsh.com a écrit
:
That's what I'm hoping for. IntelliJ looks a lot more polished especially
for the Mac.
-Original Message-
From: Francois Meillet [mailto:francois.meil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:09 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Eclipse or IntelliJ
You have a mac ?
Choose the best tool !
Choose Intellij !
François Meillet
Formation Wicket - Développement
Here's the thing, Intellij is great, but it costs like five zillion
dollars! (slight exaggeration). So I use Eclipse since its FREE! and it
works great for me (even on a Mac). The nice thing about Wicket is that
you don't need any special IDE plugins to use it. As long as your IDE
knows how
IntelliJ currently costs €179 (personal license). It allows me to work *way*
more effectively (on a Mac) than with Eclipse, which I find cluttered, slow,
non-intuitive and simply not supporting my work style/flow.
Say you gain 10 minutes per day when using IntelliJ and say you charge 60€/h:
There is a free version too... though it wont help you much on Html, js and
css
Josh
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:40 AM, Thomas Götz t...@richmountain.de wrote:
IntelliJ currently costs €179 (personal license). It allows me to work
*way* more effectively (on a Mac) than with Eclipse, which I
On Tue 19.02.2013 15:17, Stephen Walsh wrote:
Who uses what and why?
I've only ever used Eclipse, but I discovered IntelliJ earlier this week
and it's so different. Just wondering pros and cons on each.
I'm using NetBeans for serveral years now and havn't missed a
feature yet. IMHO NetBeans
all the popular IDEs have more or less converged in regard to their
java feature set. now its just a matter of muscle memory :)
-igor
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Timo Schmidt wic...@xomit.de wrote:
On Tue 19.02.2013 15:17, Stephen Walsh wrote:
Who uses what and why?
I've only ever used
http://java.dzone.com/articles/why-idea-better-eclipse
François Meillet
Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
Le 20 févr. 2013 à 01:57, Igor Vaynberg igor.vaynb...@gmail.com a écrit :
all the popular IDEs have more or less converged in regard to their
java feature set. now its just a
28 matches
Mail list logo
