Thanks Martins for your help. The reason which I am not absolutely sure,
there was a conflict on using both and using
JavaScriptHeadItem
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To un
Then you could try to debug it using browser developer tools (inspect
element, debugger etc.).
Usually there is an issue like conflicting js or missing dependencies
(throws exception on js), or something along those lines. Also could be
that dependencies are injected in wrong order, or you might a
No notification on console/browser log.
--
Sent from: http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Users-forum-f1842947.html
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@
Did you check both console log and browser (developer tools) logs?
**
Martin
ma 13. huhtik. 2020 klo 19.56 LSomefun (oyesomefunla...@gmail.com)
kirjoitti:
> I am having problem with inserting JavaScript into a Html body tag. Once I
> use the following code as shown in the tutorial into my
> Auth
I am having problem with inserting JavaScript into a Html body tag. Once I
use the following code as shown in the tutorial into my
AuthenticatedWebapplication, I can no longer login to my application.
setHeaderResponseDecorator(response -> {
return new ResourceAggregator(new
JavaScript
Hi everyone,
Is there an example or some guidelines for logging requests and responses
(including request and response headers and body) to resources implemented
with wicket-rest-annotations?
I'm looking for something low-level and cross-cutting, such as the cxf
logging interceptors
nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053p4668075.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Thanks, this is what I'm doing now, just wanted to make sure it was an ok
idea.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053p4668074.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabbl
nt way to do this.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> -
questHandler to
intercept the
exception but I'm wondering if there's a more elegant way to do this.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing l
ng if there's a more elegant way to do this.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
he-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Page-Parameters-logging-tp4668053.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Hi,
I think this is OK.
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Marios Skounakis wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to customize request logger to only log page requests. I.e. I don't
> want resource requests, etc.
>
> I have overridden log(RequestData rd, SessionData sd) as follows:
>
> @Override
> prot
Hi all,
I want to customize request logger to only log page requests. I.e. I don't
want resource requests, etc.
I have overridden log(RequestData rd, SessionData sd) as follows:
@Override
protected void log(RequestData rd, SessionData sd) {
if (rd.getResponseTarget() instanceof IPage
Change this last line log4j.appender.stdout.Threshold=info by this one
log4j.appender.stdout.Threshold=debug.
François Meillet
Formation Wicket - Développement Wicket
Le 19 avr. 2013 à 22:36, omega a écrit :
> I have a simple logging mechanism in code -
>
> private static fin
wrote:
> > Hi. I am using wicket 6.1.0 and logback-classic as my logging backend.
> > There is no configuration anywhere but wicket (and wicket only) logs
> > everything at level DEBUG - where can this be coming come from?
> >
> > wujek
>
&
.xml, logback.groovy, log4j.properties) you may find
whether there is one of those in the classpath and where exactly.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Wujek Srujek wrote:
> Hi. I am using wicket 6.1.0 and logback-classic as my logging backend.
> There is no configuration anywhere but wicket (and wicket
Hi,
Servlet specification says that the original request should be
available in request attribute named "javax.servlet.error.request_uri"
See org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.servlet.ErrorAttributes
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Douglas Ferguson wrote:
> I setup a 404 handler in my web.xml to p
I setup a 404 handler in my web.xml to point to a wicket page.
I'd like to be able to log what the original request was, but I'm having
trouble figuring this out.
Douglas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apach
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:23 PM, fachhoch wrote:
> I want to log all the pages users are viewing without any much detail
> just the page class name .
> is there any way I can get this without adding my own log statements in code
> ?
Override
on Application#init():
getRequestLoggerSetting
Yeah and use context based logging
On Nov 29, 2011 5:32 PM, "Thomas Götz" wrote:
> I would create my own base Page (where all other pages extend from) and
> add the desired logging statement there (onConfigure(), onBeforeRender()).
> Most of the times you already have a comm
I would create my own base Page (where all other pages extend from) and add the
desired logging statement there (onConfigure(), onBeforeRender()). Most of the
times you already have a common base page anyway …
Cheers,
-Tom
fachhoch wrote:
> I want to log all the pages users are view
he page class name .
> is there any way I can get this without adding my own log statements in code
> ?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/logging-the-page-class-name-tp4119768p4119768.html
> Sent from
I want to log all the pages users are viewing without any much detail
just the page class name .
is there any way I can get this without adding my own log statements in code
?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/logging-the-page-class-name
e first user when
>> the new user is identified in the second tab.
>>
>> Martijn
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-two-users-logging-in-two-tabs-of-same-browser-window-tp3027407p3029083.html
> Sent fro
nd tab.
>
> Martijn
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-two-users-logging-in-two-tabs-of-same-browser-window-tp3027407p3029083.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Eelco Hillenius
wrote:
> FWIW, we've talked in the past about making pagemaps more explicitly
> about supporting tabs and windows, but never got around taking that to
> the next level, also because we didn't all agree on how much we should
> focus on this in the fir
> Your browser doesn't identify a new tab as a new session. Therefore
> the servlet container doesn't know that it is a new user. If it is a
> valid usecase, you should build multi user session sharing in your
> app. If it is a bug, you should properly log out the first user when
> the new user is
bles in places where
>> they should not be.
>> Martin
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-two-users-logging-in-two-tabs-of-same-browser-window-tp3027407p3027490.html
> Sent from the Users forum mailing
deploy the upgrade, do I need to show
> any app init code ??
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-two-users-logging-in-two-tabs-of-same-browser-window-tp3027407p3027407.html
>
y bug or maybe you have static variables in places where
> they should not be.
> Martin
>
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-two-users-logging-in-two-tabs-of-same-browser-window-tp3027407p3027490.html
Sent from the Users forum ma
I'm using Wicket 1.3.7 in production but I'm ready to migrate to 1.4.13
> and would like to fix this before I deploy the upgrade, do I need to show
> any app init code ??
>
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ap
'm using Wicket 1.3.7 in production but I'm ready to migrate to 1.4.13
and would like to fix this before I deploy the upgrade, do I need to show
any app init code ??
Thanks for your help,
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Problem-with-
wrap a filter around wicket filter
-igor
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 9:07 AM, Jeffrey Schneller
wrote:
> I am trying to log the session id with every log event so that I can
> trace a visitors steps in the log file. I am using log4j and was hoping
> I could use either the NDC or MDC. I am not able
I am trying to log the session id with every log event so that I can
trace a visitors steps in the log file. I am using log4j and was hoping
I could use either the NDC or MDC. I am not able to figure out where to
push the session id into the context and pop it out of the context when
using NDC.
ackages in the future.
private static final Logger log =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(CurrentClassHere.class);
- Alex
-Original Message-
From: Martin Makundi [mailto:martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 4:15 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Logging
private static final Logger log =
>> LoggerFactory.getLogger(WebPage.class);
>>
>>
>> 2010/7/15 Josh Kamau :
>> > Hi guys;
>> >
>> > I know wicket comes with pre configured logging . How do i get hold of
>> the
>> &g
h Kamau :
> > Hi guys;
> >
> > I know wicket comes with pre configured logging . How do i get hold of
> the
> > Logger object so that i can log messages in my pages and panels?
> >
> > regards.
> >
> > Josh.
> >
>
> -
private static final Logger log =
LoggerFactory.getLogger(WebPage.class);
2010/7/15 Josh Kamau :
> Hi guys;
>
> I know wicket comes with pre configured logging . How do i get hold of the
> Logger object so that i can log messages in my pages and panels?
>
>
Hi guys;
I know wicket comes with pre configured logging . How do i get hold of the
Logger object so that i can log messages in my pages and panels?
regards.
Josh.
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Hans Friederichs wrote:
> Hello you all,
>
> I'm quite new to wicket, but I've made a rather complex application using
> it.
> It's a web-application that gives users the opportunity to start and view
> deployment processes.
> Each proces is represented on the main
Hello you all,
I'm quite new to wicket, but I've made a rather complex application using it.
It's a web-application that gives users the opportunity to start and view
deployment processes.
Each proces is represented on the main page by a row in a List(Model), and when
a row represents a busy pro
Think I figured this out; it appears to be related to the order things
happen.
I originally had my logging initialization as the first line in my
Application init() method.
Unfortunately this occurs after some of the class Loggers get initialized
statically and consequently our initialization
Hi list, sorry if I'm double posting but I sent a question two days ago and
haven't seen it on the daily digest yet.
I'm using Java Utils Logging along with Wicket and I have a log.properties
which I read in the WicketApplication init me
Hi list, I'm using Java Utils Logging along with Wicket and I have a
log.properties which I read in the WicketApplication init method as follows:
java.util.logging.LogManager.getLogManager().readConfiguration(input);
I confirm that my log.properties is read in correctly using a deb
api to impl thus avoiding classloader
hell.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
H, very interesting, didnt realise that commons-logging was problematic,
just that I avoided it before because I didnt want to introduce yet another
library dependency for logging; which
By the way (not to start a flame war or anything), but "clogging" has
been working just fine for us. We use it along with SLF4J using the
adapter, We've had no problems at all. Don't get me wrong, I am
aware of the issues with Commons Logging and I've argued for us to
c
dnt realise that commons-logging was problematic,
> just that I avoided it before because I didnt want to introduce yet another
> library dependency for logging; which is so low level that I don't think the
> logging stack ever change in a project lifetime.
>
> About slf4j,
SLF4J would work just fine, too. Either way, you should declare them
static. That avoids serializing them altogether.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i wouldnt, commons logging, aka clogging, has been a bane of web
> applications for a long time...
>
>
H, very interesting, didnt realise that commons-logging was
problematic, just that I avoided it before because I didnt want to
introduce yet another library dependency for logging; which is so low
level that I don't think the logging stack ever change in a project
lifetime.
About
i wouldnt, commons logging, aka clogging, has been a bane of web
applications for a long time...
wicket uses slf4j, why dont you do the same? still declaring your
loggers static.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
> I think I'll use this then. I was reluctant to
orted by Wicket out of box?
>
> Lester
>
> Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>>
>> declare your logger static
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm using
I think I'll use this then. I was reluctant to because of the need to
introduce yet another library (some examples used this).
Thanks!
Lester
James Carman wrote:
Commons Logging?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
Hi,
I'm using log4j as my logging tool.
-igor
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
Hi,
I'm using log4j as my logging tool.
But when I add log4j loggers into my components, I get serialization issues.
Wicket gives serialization errors because of the logger.
E.g.
class SomeForm extends Form {
Logger l
declare your logger static
-igor
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using log4j as my logging tool.
> But when I add log4j loggers into my components, I get serialization issues.
> Wicket gives serialization errors because of the logger
Commons Logging?
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Lester Chua wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using log4j as my logging tool.
> But when I add log4j loggers into my components, I get serialization issues.
> Wicket gives serialization errors because of the logger.
>
> E.g.
>
Hi,
I'm using log4j as my logging tool.
But when I add log4j loggers into my components, I get serialization issues.
Wicket gives serialization errors because of the logger.
E.g.
class SomeForm extends Form {
Logger logger = LogManager.getLogger(SomeForm.class);
public void someM
Thanks, Maarten. Richard
From: users-return-39497-richard.a.rowe=saic@wicket.apache.org on behalf of
Maarten Bosteels
Sent: Wed 7/8/2009 4:37 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Logging configuration for Wicket - Newbie
http://logging.apache.org
:46 PM, Rowe, Richard A. wrote:
> I am trying to get my logging configured for a Wicket application. I am
> using SLF4J and LOG4J. I have configured two appenders (Console and
> File). I am noticing that all Wicket rendering statements are going to
> my log file (INFO, DEBUG, etc).
I am trying to get my logging configured for a Wicket application. I am
using SLF4J and LOG4J. I have configured two appenders (Console and
File). I am noticing that all Wicket rendering statements are going to
my log file (INFO, DEBUG, etc). This is not desirable. How do I turn
this off? Thanks
hmm I usually dont put anything in the log location, and the log ends
up the correct place... On tomcat thats either log folder or in the
extracted war..
2009/6/5 Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail :
> :-)
> Tonio, my man. Thank you so much for your reply.
>
> I'm looking for some alternatives.
>
> I'l
:-)
Tonio, my man. Thank you so much for your reply.
I'm looking for some alternatives.
I'll see to post (mail) my conclusions if any.
f(t)
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Tonio Caputo wrote:
> Francisco,
>
> I'm not a wicket expert (as you know), the log4j configuration seems to be
> ok, so
Francisco,
I'm not a wicket expert (as you know), the log4j configuration seems to be
ok, so probably
the reason for the problem is in other place.
hope this helps
tonio
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail <
francisco.diaztre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm hav
Hi all,
I'm having a small problem trying to log to an additional file with a
org.apache.log4j.FileAppender.
Problem: Does not log Wicket stuff to the file. For instance this message:
"WARNING: Tried to retrieve a localized string for a component that has not
yet been added to the page.".
I
gt;
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Douglas Ferguson
> wrote:
>> We are experiencing some hard to trace performance issues (CPU pegged by
>> JAVA). so we want to implement some logging in order to Audit the code.
>>
>> Any suggestions on wicket state that we
Douglas Ferguson douglasferguson.us> writes:
>
> I will definitely share my findings. I saw 400% CPU (we have 4 proc box),
> the other day!
>
> What debugging approach are you taking?
>
> Douglas
>
I've tried a couple monitoring tools for Tomcat, but they where too
intrusive (required ins
ace performance issues (CPU pegged by
> JAVA). so we want to implement some logging in order to Audit the code.
>
> Any suggestions on wicket state that we can easily print out? I.E. size of
> page map? Etc?
>
> D/
> --
@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Logging for performance analysis
Douglas Ferguson douglasferguson.us> writes:
>
> We are experiencing some hard to trace performance issues (CPU pegged by
JAVA). so we want to implement some
> logging in order to Audit the code.
>
> Any suggestions on wicket
Douglas Ferguson douglasferguson.us> writes:
>
> We are experiencing some hard to trace performance issues (CPU pegged by
JAVA). so we want to implement some
> logging in order to Audit the code.
>
> Any suggestions on wicket state that we can easily print out? I.E. siz
egged by
> JAVA). so we want to implement some logging in order to Audit the code.
>
> Any suggestions on wicket state that we can easily print out? I.E. size of
> page map? Etc?
>
> D/
> -
> To uns
We are experiencing some hard to trace performance issues (CPU pegged by JAVA).
so we want to implement some logging in order to Audit the code.
Any suggestions on wicket state that we can easily print out? I.E. size of page
map? Etc?
D
we are trying to do logging on the request time to check the application
processing time and the request output network time
we first try to time the request processing by overriding
WebRequestCycle#onBeginRequest, #onEndRequest
but it seems the processing time is the same as the request time
Hi Kent,
I am using the SLF4j implementation of commons-logging. If you use
maven2 take a look at this blog article for an pom example that will set
this up with log4j as logging backend:
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/2007/07/no-more-commons-logging.html.
Below is a more up to date
Hi, I have some questions about logging, more specifically about setting it
up and making sure it works.
The project I'm doing will use Wicket, Spring and Hibernate. I know that
Wicket and Hibernate uses Simple Logging Facade for Java (SL4J) and that
Spring is using the logging component
ting UnexpectedExceptionDisplay page, you
>> can
>> get the exception that caused this page to be fired up?
>>
>> Cheers, Graeme.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-the-Exception-from-Exception-Page-%28for-logging-purp
up?
>
> Cheers, Graeme.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Getting-the-Exception-from-Exception-Page-%28for-logging-purposes%29...-tp21555998p21555998.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User m
Hi,
Is it possible that after setting UnexpectedExceptionDisplay page, you can
get the exception that caused this page to be fired up?
Cheers, Graeme.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-the-Exception-from-Exception-Page-%28for-logging-purposes%29
You do not need to return the same instance but you do need to return
an instance of the same class. Swarm does not keep your original
logincontext anywhere, rather it keeps some sort of hash around.
logging off with a new instance of the same class will produce the
same hash. For that purpose
wrote:
You have to realize that both swarm and acegi keep a copy of the
logged in user. So you have to logoff at 2 places.
You could use a logoff page but imo it would be better to do the
logging off in the link itself. Something like:
Link logoff = new Link("l
You have to realize that both swarm and acegi keep a copy of the
logged in user. So you have to logoff at 2 places.
You could use a logoff page but imo it would be better to do the
logging off in the link itself. Something like:
Link logoff = new Link("l
I am using Swarm with Acegi integration. Authentication and
authorization work fine, but I am having trouble logging out. I use a
link to a Logout class that implements the following code to log the
user out.
public class LoggedOutPage extends SecureWebPage {
private static final long
Gerolf Seitz wrote:
>
> you could do that in your own WebRequestCycle subclass in the
> onBeginRequest method.
>
Thanks, This was exactly what I was looking for!
Artur
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Logging-every-request-into-db-tp16740900p16743061.ht
ervletResponse response,
> FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException {
>
>super.doFilter(request, response, chain);
>
>RequestCycle requestCycle = RequestCycle.get();
>// logging goes here
>
>}
> }
>
> But RequestCycle.get() ret
tResponse response,
FilterChain chain) throws IOException, ServletException {
super.doFilter(request, response, chain);
RequestCycle requestCycle = RequestCycle.get();
// logging goes here
}
}
But RequestCycle.get() returns null.
I will appreciate any suggestions.
Tha
weird. i dont use jdk logging so i dont think i will be able to help
you much. perhaps you should set a breakpoint on
handler.setFormatter() and see if anything else calls it _after_ your
code has executed.
-igor
On Feb 7, 2008 11:41 AM, Fabrizio Giudici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&g
On 07/feb/08, at 20:36, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
do you have slf4j adapter for jdk logging jar?
http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14LoggerAdapter.html
Yes, I've added it when I upgraded to 1.3.0 (I bet that without it I
wouldn't have any logging at all from Wicket). But I
do you have slf4j adapter for jdk logging jar?
http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/impl/JDK14LoggerAdapter.html
-igor
On Feb 7, 2008 5:13 AM, Fabrizio Giudici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, that's really silly. In my application I use java.util.logging
> (and I need/want to u
Ok, that's really silly. In my application I use java.util.logging
(and I need/want to use it, since some external components use it).
For all the projects I've developed in every contest, from JSP to JSF
to Swing etc... I've always used a custom logging formatter that puts
that loads a separate properties file. It
took me a while to figure a way to do this so that my configuration
would run before any Wicket logging calls were done (more precisely,
before log4j's configuration is run.) But I managed to do it by running
that configuration in the init() o
Exactly.
I do want to allow that. And until this issue that was never a problem.
I could restart the server and continue where I was in the application.
But I think I would sacrifice that if I could for my logging issue.
-- Scott
Nick Heudecker wrote:
Do you mean if a Wicket component
'm using a custom extension to log4j's FileAppender. I need to
> configure this in a class that loads a separate properties file. It
> took me a while to figure a way to do this so that my configuration
> would run before any Wicket logging calls were done (more precisely,
> befo
so that my configuration
would run before any Wicket logging calls were done (more precisely,
before log4j's configuration is run.) But I managed to do it by running
that configuration in the init() of a separate servlet that loads before
Wicket's.
This works fine, but occasionally
Thanks
Jan Kriesten wrote:
How can I log to a file using log4j?!
documentation is found here: http://slf4j.org/
there's a wrapped implementation for log4j.
regards, --- jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
> How can I log to a file using log4j?!
documentation is found here: http://slf4j.org/
there's a wrapped implementation for log4j.
regards, --- jan.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
Hi All,
How can I log to a file using log4j?!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Logging-to-a-File-tf4682704.html#a13380693
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe
John --
Thanks for the quick reply. That did it!
-- Sasha
John Krasnay wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:49:25AM -0700, Sasha O wrote:
Hello Wicket people --
Love the framework so far.
Getting this message, have no idea how to deal with it:
<<<
Exception in thread "ModificationWatcher Task
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 09:49:25AM -0700, Sasha O wrote:
> Hello Wicket people --
>
> Love the framework so far.
>
> Getting this message, have no idea how to deal with it:
>
> <<<
> Exception in thread "ModificationWatcher Task"
> java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
> org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAda
Hello Wicket people --
Love the framework so far.
Getting this message, have no idea how to deal with it:
<<<
Exception in thread "ModificationWatcher Task"
java.lang.AbstractMethodError:
org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter.isTraceEnabled()Z
at org.apache.wicket.util.thread.Task$1.run(
98 matches
Mail list logo
