Hi, http://wicketstuff.org/ seems down...
In my POM I have reference to org.wicketstuff:inmethod-grid:jar:1.4-SNAPSHOT
and maven tries to download it and fails !
The jar is in my local repository but maven ALWAYS tries to download it and
fails...
I also tried mvn -o compile (offline) but it fails t
in the download from github jquery and jwicket don't work
when i try to get it by maven dependency maven cannot find.
regards Heiner
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
I'am looking for a way to do reverse ajax (or cometd) in Wicket.
I have search the Wicket website, examples, and google and the only
thing I found was some mail archives talking about a maven artifact
called "wicketstuff-push", a
Hello there !
Is there any news on WicketStuff JmxPanel ?
It seems to be broken for a while now
http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-03/msg01007.html
It seems that in the past there was some consensus on keeping
wicket-jmx and jmxpanel up to date.
http://old.nabble.com/Integrate
I'm a little confused about the versioning for Wicketstuff. I am currently
using inmethod-grid, jquery, and yui. All three projects now have a
1.4-SNAPSHOT and a 1.4.2-SNAPSHOT version and (inmethod-grid and yui both
have a 1.4.1 release version). What is the difference between the two
SNA
Hi,
Is anyone maintaining the wicketstuff-dojo project anymore? If not then I
can get the source code and try to get it working in 1.4 and commit the
changes.
If this is not the forum for wicket-stuff questions I apologize and please
let me know where one is.
Thanks,
Josh
The wicketstuff-core is calling itself version 1.4.2 in the HEAD of SVN.
Shouldn't this be updated to 1.4.7 now to keep in sync with Wicket?
Bng
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For addit
As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the
wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7. wicketstuff-core's
version number is now 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT, and the idea is that people can
test it, and barring any major problems it can be released as a stable
ver
Hello,
Now that Wicket 1.4.0 is out, I wonder which wicketstuff core version is
compatible. There is no 1.4.0 version of wicketstuff core (yet?). Should I
use 1.4-rc8-SNAPSHOT?
I guess http://sourceforge.net/projects/wicket-stuff/files/ is no longer in
use.
Regards,
Erik.
--
Erik van
Hi Guys
I've been using Guice for a while together with warp persist and dynamic
finders. Would it be of any interest to switch Iolite to Guice? Please say
if it has interest then I might do it, but won't if nobody uses it.
http://www.wideplay.com/guicewebextensions2
http://www.wideplay.com/dyna
When/how often are the Wicketstuff snapshots generated? I am using
org.wicketstuff
wicketstuff-scriptaculous
1.4-SNAPSHOT
in my pom.xml but get
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org
.wicketstuff
.scriptaculous.dragdrop.SortableListView.getModelObject()Ljava/lang
Hi
I'd really like a wish list for wicketstuff. So reply with your wishes
and I might have time at a point to implement it:)
I'll start by adding this to the list:
Integration with : http://code.google.com/p/iui/
I'll add a wishlist to the wiki or maybe my blog..
--
-
I've idle for some time so my hands are itching to code again. I'll be
implementing Nifty Corners Cube soon.. If you have further suggestions
or improvements, please come with them now, i'll consider them and
possibly implement it :)
regards Nino
--
I know that that Wicketstuff Jira was taken down and an email was sent in
April saying it was temporary. Is there a timeline for its return? What
shall we do in the meantime?
I have a number of patches to submit for the inmethod-grid. I hesitate to
commit them without review by someone else
wicketstuff.org seems to be down, can someone start its Tomcat or
whatever it's running? thx!
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
Hi,
is there another wicketstuff-repo (a mirror for example)? Wicketstuff is now
down for some days and
I'll need some artifacts from the repo.
marc
Hi.
As you might already noticed, http://wicketstuff.org is down.
Anyone have any ideas?
V
I'm interested in implementing an authentication feature with
wicketstuff-push (1.4.9.2), and it works with slight modifications. I
share what I did.
I basically implements written at
http://cometd.org/documentation/howtos/authentication.
What I change is two methods.
(1) CometdAbstractBeh
Hi guys,
I have just upgraded a large project from wicket 1.3 to 1.4(.18) and
needed to update wicketstuff-animator.
I now have a patch against the import-backup on github but have no idea
how / where to contribute this.
Should I fork the backup (weird) or can I start a new repo from the code
in
Hi guys,
I have just upgraded a large project from wicket 1.3 to 1.4(.18) and needed to
update wicketstuff-animator.
I now have a patch against the import-backup on github but have no idea how /
where to contribute this.
Should I fork the backup (weird) or can I start a new repo from the code
I am trying to use wicketstuyff.dojo , I saw the version available is 1.3
and it does not work with wicket 1.4.12 , please tell me if there is any
wicketstuff-dojo compatible with wicket 1.4.12 ?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/wicketstuff-dojo
Sonatype's repo is the new home:
https://repository.sonatype.org/index.html#nexus-search;quick~inmethod-grid
The maintainer of wicketstuff.org is notified.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Fabrice BUQUET
wrote:
> Hi, http://wicketstuff.org/ seems down...
> In my POM I have reference to org.wicke
Does anyone have any clue why all the links are dead in Internet Exploder for
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket13/?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-jamon/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/jamon/
I was browsing the sources for wicketstuff-jamon and I was wondering
how to actually "hook it up" into my app? How do you use the custom
web request cycle inst
Good afternoon,
I'm currently struggling with wicketstuff-facebook 6.12.0 with the same
version of Wicket. I'm unable to have the logged in callback executed.
Here is my code:
final LoginButton button = new LoginButton("loginButton",
FacebookPermission.user_events);
Hello All,
Maybe anyone knows is there any wicketstuff snapshot repository?
If yes, what is the update period?
Thanks in advance
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Hi all,
I suggest a breaking change to wicketstuff-shiro here:
https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/issues/328
In brief: wicketstuffshiro allows to use @ShiroSecurityConstraint or
@ShiroSecurityConstraints (with s at the end) annotations on Component
classes to trigger security checks at
Hi everybody,
I've created a gh-pages branch to host javadoc for wicketstuff. It
contains docs for 6.x and master branch. They are linked in the readme
file of each respective branch.
http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc6/apidocs/index.html
http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc7/ap
Hi there,
I was wondering if there are plans to release Wicketstuff 8.5.0 any time soon.
ATM I have a startup exception when using Wicket Spring Boot [1] with Wicket
8.5.0 because it detects a mismatch between Wicket's and Wicketstuff's versions
[2].
I understand this is not a fault
Hello,
Any projections on when wicketstuff for v10.x will be available?
Thanks!
—
Shawn
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
All,
Is there a wicketstuff-dojo project that is based off of dojo 1.1? The
only one I could find was based off of dojo 0.4.
Thanks,
Jason
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
As far as I know it only lives in subversion. I tried it myself a month ago
and it is functional:
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push/
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push-examples/
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008
Le jeudi 03 juillet 2008 à 16:28 +0200, Frank Bille a écrit :
> As far as I know it only lives in subversion. I tried it myself a month ago
> and it is functional:
>
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push/
> http://wicket-stuff.svn.
as I know it only lives in subversion. I tried it myself a month
>> ago
>> and it is functional:
>>
>> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push/
>> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wickets
> > Le jeudi 03 juillet 2008 à 16:28 +0200, Frank Bille a écrit :
> >> As far as I know it only lives in subversion. I tried it myself a month
> >> ago
> >> and it is functional:
> >>
> >> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wick
;> >> ago
>> >> and it is functional:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push/
>> >>
>> http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-push-ex
Le mercredi 16 juillet 2008 à 18:47 -0700, freak182 a écrit :
> Hello,
> I successfully implement wicket-push in our wicket application...i just used
> the example in the wicket-stuff...with the default configuration...i just
> checked out and run it...then customized for our needs...
With wicket
-------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wicketstuff-push-tp18260308p18504561.html
Sent from t
Hi,
I've switched to using the YuiMenuBar in wicket stuff from directly using
the Yui javascript.
The YuiMenuBar automatically adds this javascript...
var oMenu = new YAHOO.widget.MenuBar("webMenuBar",
{visible:true,clicktohide:false,autosubmenudisplay: true,
hid
We are about to integrate wicketstuff-minis in our project. However, we
noticed on Nabble that prototip is out of date based on some comments by the
community. I have wicketstuff commit rights and more than willing to update to
the latest. However, when I looked at the MVN repository for
i guess its waiting for someone with time to bring it back up to speed.
-igor
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, rodrigo benenson
wrote:
> Hello there !
> Is there any news on WicketStuff JmxPanel ?
>
> It seems to be broken for a while now
> http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apa
go benenson
> wrote:
>> Hello there !
>> Is there any news on WicketStuff JmxPanel ?
>>
>> It seems to be broken for a while now
>> http://osdir.com/ml/users-wicket.apache.org/2009-03/msg01007.html
>>
>> It seems that in the past there was some conse
ts waiting for someone with time to bring it back up to speed.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, rodrigo benenson
>> wrote:
>>> Hello there !
>>> Is there any news on WicketStuff JmxPanel ?
>>>
>>> It seems to be broke
t; > Martijn
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Igor Vaynberg
> wrote:
> >> i guess its waiting for someone with time to bring it back up to speed.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, rodrigo benenson
&g
t; i guess its waiting for someone with time to bring it back up to speed.
>> >>
>> >> -igor
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, rodrigo benenson
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hello there !
>> >>> Is there any
...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> i guess its waiting for someone with time to bring it back up to
>>> speed.
>>> >>
>>> >> -igor
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:05 PM, rodrigo benenson
>>> >&g
t;>> > Gerolf going AWOL?
>>>> >
>>>> > Martijn
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
>>>> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >> i guess its waiting for some
it hasn't been integrated with wicket-jmx, since i wasn't really happy with
a few things in wicketstuff-jmxpanel.
if my memory serves me well, i've seen at least 1 other solution that had
even more functionality, i think, than
the jmxpanel i started. couldn't say specific pr
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Gerolf Seitz wrote:
> regarding AWOL, i'm still watching wicket-dev closely and wicket-users to a
> certain extent.
> please accept my apologies for not taking care of things i started. i would
> love to get back into wicket
> development, and hopefully in the rat
t hasn't been integrated with wicket-jmx, since i wasn't really happy with
> a few things in wicketstuff-jmxpanel.
> if my memory serves me well, i've seen at least 1 other solution that had
> even more functionality, i think, than
> the jmxpanel i started. couldn&#x
thanks martijn,
i'm actually very excited about the new URL mapping stuff from igor and
matej and the
upcoming ajax rework.
unfortunately, i haven't been able to use wicket so far in my current
company until very recently
for a rather small project.
and it's kinda hypocritical to not eat your own
>
> regards Nino
>
> 2009/11/24 Gerolf Seitz
>
>> it hasn't been integrated with wicket-jmx, since i wasn't really happy with
>> a few things in wicketstuff-jmxpanel.
>> if my memory serves me well, i've seen at least 1 other solution that had
>
ds Nino
> >
> > 2009/11/24 Gerolf Seitz
> >
> >> it hasn't been integrated with wicket-jmx, since i wasn't really happy
> with
> >> a few things in wicketstuff-jmxpanel.
> >> if my memory serves me well, i've seen at least 1 other sol
Heres the snapshot:
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/wicketstuff-jmx-panel/1.4-SNAPSHOT/
But as Pedro mentioned he had one too,
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/MBeanView+-+JMX+panel
They should probably be merged. I like DRY :)
2009/11/24 rodrigo
t;
> > > I'll mention that the one from JBOSS(4.0.2-4.2) have a very retro ui,
> > light
> > > years from jmxpanel..
> > >
> > > regards Nino
> > >
> > > 2009/11/24 Gerolf Seitz
> > >
> > >> it hasn't been int
Wicket stuff is a free-for-all with little documentation. I think
1.4.2-SNAPSHOT was accidentally left in the pom after one of the versioned
builds (because that's what maven defaults to). But the idea is that
wicketstuff-core modules should match Wicket - so 1.4-SNAPSHOT **should** be
what
I have committed jWicket 0.5 to trunk. It's a stable an distribution
ready version. Should I commit changes to
releases/wicketstuff-core-1.4-rc7? Or is this done by the wicketstuff
maintainers?
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e
Are you a committer in wicket-stuff? If not, provide your sf.net user ID
and we can add you.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Josh Chappelle wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is anyone maintaining the wicketstuff-dojo project anymore? If n
I am not. In fact I don't have a sf.net user id. How should I go about
getting one?
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:48 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
Are you a comm
gt; From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:48 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
>
> Are you a committer in wicket-stuff? If not, provide your sf.net user ID
> and we can add you.
>
> --
> Jeremy
My sf.net user id is jchappelle.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:55 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
Register on their site.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http
You're added
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Josh Chappelle wrote:
> jchappelle
Thanks a lot Jeremy.
Josh
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Thomerson [mailto:jer...@wickettraining.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 12:10 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: WicketStuff Dojo
You're added
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, M
Really, it should match what's at trunk of Wicket, which should be
1.5-SNAPSHOT. There should be a branch for 1.4.x that is 1.4-SNAPSHOT.
But, nobody is really maintaining it any more, so it's a free-for-all.
That's always been the problem with WicketStuff.
--
Jeremy
It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a
clear choice here.
Is Wicketstuff going to be maintained as a place where lots of useful
add-ons will live? If so, it needs someone to take a slightly more
active role as curator; make sure the releases are done in
I always thought, that Jeremy was the maintainer of WicketStuff. Guess I
was wrong. :)
Sidenote:
Also, I really wanted to write docs for the javaee-inject project, but I
don't have confluence access, and the signup gives:
org.springframework.transaction.UnexpectedRollbackException: Transa
Comments inline
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Boris Goldowsky wrote:
> It sounds like whoever is responsible for wicketstuff needs to make a clear
> choice here.
>
The community is responsible for WicketStuff. This includes yo
See other reply to Boris. Anyone can pick it up and become the maintainer
of WS. But it's going to take a group of people who set some rules about it
and then follow them. The problem with that is that then people *will*
whine because they always wanted WicketStuff to be a no-rules rep
Here is how I understand wicketstuff hosting:
Someone makes something cool and decides to share it with the community.
Then this person asks in the mailing lists for commit permissions. After
that this person jumps into something else and don't have time to
support the project. Later on I
Exactly (I wrote something similar, but it apparently was declared spam:().
We could of course improve our structure as always, lifting the level a bit.
As I see it wicketstuff are as ops4j, which brings advantages and
disadvantages as well.
-regards Nino
2010/3/18 Martin Grigorov
> Here
Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on
WicketStuff. I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture
and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from
the community.
I'd volunteer to put a bit of time into this, but I don't have
I'll be happy to join in Boris.
2010/3/18 Boris Goldowsky
> Thank you for your thoughts Jeremy -- and your previous work on
> WicketStuff. I am certainly unhappy to hear that it felt like torture
> and that junk was being dumped on you rather than getting support from
> the c
Perhaps we should define an island of stability (like the name wickststuff-core
implies). Maybe under another name (e.g. wicketstuff-stable).
This place should only hold projects that are maintained and that are buildable
with actual wicket versions. The rest of wicketstuff should be left as ist
nino martinez wael wrote:
I'll be happy to join in Boris.
That would be awesome, thanks Nino.
I'm thinking the first thing would be to bump the wicket dependency to
v1.4.7 and do a maven release of the current state of wicketstuff-core
as version 1.4.7. Make sense? Is that som
Hi,
count me in. I would like to help maintain wicketstuff-core too. ;)
When I came to build wicketstuff-core, sometimes I end up fixing
dependency issues and other stuff in others projects, but I don't commit
them, because I don't want to modify someone else's code without her/his
2010/3/19 Major Péter
> Hi,
>
> count me in. I would like to help maintain wicketstuff-core too. ;)
> When I came to build wicketstuff-core, sometimes I end up fixing
> dependency issues and other stuff in others projects, but I don't commit
> them, because I don't w
Yepp, nice chat, but who wants to do the dirty work??
The first thing would be to create the 1.4.x branch, then release the
current state as wicketstuff 1.4.7, and then modify the settings of the
trunk to compile with wicket trunk.
Let's split these jobs up to people, then do it.
Also may
7;re lucky, everything in Wicketstuff may work fine unchanged with
1.4 and 1.5, and I suggest we can save ourselves a large amount of
headache by just maintaining a single trunk, and bumping the version
after there's an official Wicket release.
Of course, correct me if I'm wrong. I don'
mitting every bug fix to two different versions, right?
Yes, you're right about this, maybe we should wait until the first 1.5
RC with it.
> If we're lucky, everything in Wicketstuff may work fine unchanged with
> 1.4 and 1.5, and I suggest we can save ourselves a large amount of
Should we really start with a big bang? Support wicketstuff STABLE core
releases for Wicket 1.4 AND 1.5RCx? Is a RC for Wicket 1.5 in sight? Or does
this mean everything in wicketstuff will stay as it is for a long time?
Why not start with a smaller step and create a core wicketstuff release for
+1 for me on upgrading wicketstuff core to 1.4.7.
On another topic making sure that an upgrade actually works are
another thing. Code might compile but there could be runtime
problems.. I discussed looong time ago a possibility for making tests
for the javascript parts of the code aswell, with
1.5 rc only makes sense if it is not compatible with 1.4 any longer.
Otherwise 1.4 makes better sense to me ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 23 Mar 2010, at 10:45, Stefan Lindner wrote:
Should we really start with a big bang? Support wicketstuff STABLE
core releases for Wicket 1.4 AND 1.5RCx
Tests are good, but this could be also arranged with voting, or not?
So what would be the best?
Modify the trunk to use 1.4.7, and release the current state as
wicketstuff 1.4.1 (because it's using 1.4.1 now) or modify the trunk
first for 1.4.7 fix the incompatibilities if there are, and
trunk to use 1.4.7, and release the current state as
> wicketstuff 1.4.1 (because it's using 1.4.1 now) or modify the trunk
> first for 1.4.7 fix the incompatibilities if there are, and then release
> it as 1.4.7 and make trunk to follow 1.4-SNAPSHOT?
> Or what else do you have in m
Hello,
I'd like the trunk to follow the latest wicket release since when
wicketstuff-core is released it is meant to be paired with the current
wicket release. i.e. not 1.4-SNAPSHOT but 1.4.7, 1.4.8, 1.4.9 and
eventually into 1.5RC1, etc.
Envisioned Process for 1.4.8 Wicket Relea
to be setting wicketstuff-core's dependency to wicket
1.4.7, and then asking people to test it. We should probably set a date
by which we ask people to test out the modules they use -- otherwise if
no issues are reported we won't know when to declare the testing period
over and
hich
> would seem to be setting wicketstuff-core's dependency to wicket 1.4.7, and
> then asking people to test it. We should probably set a date by which we
> ask people to test out the modules they use -- otherwise if no issues are
> reported we won't know when to declare the test
Hi,
> +1 on creating wicketstuff-core jira to coordinate release process.
Here it is: http://wicketstuff.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
> +1 on creating a wicketstuff-core/wicketstuff-test module to share
> testing code between core projects.
>
> +1 on running integration te
>
> Also TeamCity is failing lately, since there is some network error, and
> it cannot access the svn (Connection refused).
Hmmm we had that problem with bamboo too :/ Im not sure it's the same though..
2010/3/23 Major Péter :
> Hi,
>
>> +1 on creating wicketstuff-core jira
artifacts should find their way into the repo once team city builds..
2010/3/24 Boris Goldowsky :
> As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the
> wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7. wicketstuff-core's
> version number is now 1.4.7-SNAPSHOT, a
Hi Boris,
thank you for doing the job. I have tested jWicket again and everything looks
fine.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Boris Goldowsky [mailto:bgoldow...@cast.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. März 2010 22:14
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Wicketstuff updated!
As
-examples
What's going to happen with them?
Regards,
Peter
2010-03-24 22:14 keltezéssel, Boris Goldowsky írta:
> As discussed, and not hearing any objections, I've updated the
> wicketstuff-core project to depend on Wicket 1.4.7. wicketstuff-core's
> version number is now 1.4.
I guess we could start a branch, called wicketstuff-core-attic. Then
upgrade them to latest wicket version and see if they work and if not,
then remove them. Unless someone wants to fix the errors.
2010/3/28 Major Péter :
> JavaEE-Inject is tested, and OK.
>
> It looks like there are
own attic
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:57 AM, nino martinez wael <
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess we could start a branch, called wicketstuff-core-attic. Then
> upgrade them to latest wicket version and see if they w
Well, one could see that in version x.x.x of wicketstuff core project
x was excluded.. It was just a proposition. As with everything else it
has pro's and con's.
2010/4/1 Jeremy Thomerson :
> there's already an attic - why create a new one? it will just generate more
> email
<
nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, one could see that in version x.x.x of wicketstuff core project
> x was excluded.. It was just a proposition. As with everything else it
> has pro's and con's.
>
> 2010/4/1 Jeremy Thomerson :
> > there's already an a
1.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:844)
>at
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:581)
>at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619
Hallo,
I have checked out the source code and taken a look at the class Veil. I
found the following code:
public void bind(Component component)
{
super.bind(component);
if (component != null)
{
Hi,
I am trying to do a checkout of wicketstuff but I get redirected to the
same URL:
e...@oostblok:~/projects/wicketstuff$ svn co
http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/tinymce/
svn: Repository moved temporarily to
'http://wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicket
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Erik van Oosten wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Now that Wicket 1.4.0 is out, I wonder which wicketstuff core version is
> compatible. There is no 1.4.0 version of wicketstuff core (yet?). Should I
> use 1.4-rc8-SNAPSHOT?
AFAIK wickets
1 - 100 of 1279 matches
Mail list logo
