[USMA:45621] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread simon_meng
Would I be correct in deducing that the preference of fractions or decimals is tied to a preference of English units or metric units? From my experience, the English system tends to be more fractional driven where the metric system is more decimal driven? Someone may be looking for a

[USMA:45622] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread John M. Steele
Yes. Computers, calculators, etc only use decimal. In the real world, you almost never have the nice clean coefficients where fractions really work. --- On Thu, 8/13/09, Stephen Davis stevo.da...@btinternet.com wrote: From: Stephen Davis stevo.da...@btinternet.com Subject: [USMA:45608]

[USMA:45623] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Friday 14 August 2009 08:38:33 John M. Steele wrote: Yes. Computers, calculators, etc only use decimal. In the real world, you almost never have the nice clean coefficients where fractions really work. Computers use binary, in which 0.1 cannot be represented exactly. They can be

[USMA:45624] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Aaron Harper
Crunching numbers is not the issue. Pure mathematics starts with ratios (fractions) then moves on to tools for what we call geometry. For example, the volume of a sphere is defined as a ratio (fraction), not a decimal approximation. Next we move into Trigonometry and Calculus. The definitions

[USMA:45625] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread simon_meng
Amen! I beginning to wonder what kind of forum this is. When a topic involving the metric system is brought up the responses are almost zero. Talk about something other then the metric system or something loosely connected and then everybody joins in. I hate to complain since I'm so new

[USMA:45626] OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Stephen Davis
Do you think that for effective integration of SI into American society, it would have to forced through and made mandatory to only use SI units? Or do you think freedom of choice and polite persuation would be more effective in getting the benefits of SI across? Something that seems to be the

[USMA:45627] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Stephen Davis
Hey...I didn't say it was hard, I said it was a trick! :-) - Original Message - From: James R. Frysinger j...@metricmethods.com To: Stephen Davis stevo.da...@btinternet.com Cc: U.S. Metric Association usma@colostate.edu Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 1:36 AM Subject: Re: [USMA:45619]

[USMA:45628] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread John Frewen-Lord
I agree. The quick brutal approach is, rightly or wrongly, the most effective. Short term pain for long term gain. The persuasive gentle approach has been shown to not work, and is, as has been said here many times before, the primary reason why the UK (and Canada) are in such a measurement

[USMA:45629] SI only RE: Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Brij Bhushan Vij
Sirs: .The question of whether decimals or fractions are better. Is the forum still debatingwhat is better or needs to re-construct ideas to 'implement' what had been agreed over 200 years earlier while signing 'Convention du Metre'? How long will US take to THINK and/or GO

[USMA:45630] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Patrick Moore
That¹s funny. I wonder if it¹s because we agree on the most basic things. From: simon_m...@live.com Reply-To: simon_m...@live.com Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:46:53 -0400 To: U.S. Metric Association usma@colostate.edu Subject: [USMA:45625] Re: Maths (or should that be math?) Amen! I beginning

[USMA:45632] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread simon_meng
Re: [USMA:45625] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)I for one am new to this forum and have no idea what basic things we agree upon. Can someone compose a list? This may help in bringing up old topics over and over again. Simon From: Patrick Moore Sent: Friday, 2009-08-14 15:36 To: U.S.

[USMA:45638] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread simon_meng
I'm wondering what kind of economic damage has been/is being done to the country's industries when some businesses operate only in metric and others try to resist it as much as possible. For example, if I design a product in metric and send it to you to make for me and you tell me you can't

[USMA:45639] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Martin Vlietstra
The quickest way to find out is to visit http://www.ukma.org.uk/books/avbm/summary.aspx and see the UKMA's publication A Very British Mess. The executive summary is on-line, the full publication is available at a reasonable cost. _ From: owner-u...@colostate.edu

[USMA:45640] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Pat Naughtin
On 15/08/2009, at 2:20 AM, Aaron Harper wrote: The question of whether decimals or fractions are better has nothing to do with the purpose of this forum: Metrication. Dear Aaron, What you say is true but the issue of the form of fractions, whether as common or vulgar fractions and as

[USMA:45641] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Pat Naughtin
On 15/08/2009, at 5:50 AM, simon_m...@live.com simon_m...@live.com wrote: I don't think we need 10 years to make the change as in the past. Five years is plenty of time. Changes in such areas as gasoline pump, weather reporting, retail scales can all be changed easily due to their

[USMA:45642] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Pat Naughtin
Dear Simon, To the best of my knowledge there is no detailed answers to your questions as no definitive study on the benefits of metrication has been done anywhere in the world. I have made an estimate that has not been challenged that it currently costs the USA more than a trillion

[USMA:45643] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Pat Naughtin
Dear Stephen, I don't disagree with what you say, but I would like to elaborate on a few points. I will intersperse some remarks. On 15/08/2009, at 6:16 AM, Stephen Davis wrote: Wellfor example in the UK, the vast majority of retail sales are done in metric units, grams, litres, etc,

[USMA:45644] Re: Maths (or should that be math?)

2009-08-14 Thread Brian J White
Welcome back John/kilopascal/Eunic/Jeremiah! I see you can't stay away for long. :) At 10:46 2009-08-14, simon_m...@live.com wrote: Amen! I beginning to wonder what kind of forum this is. When a topic involving the metric system is brought up the responses are almost zero. Talk

[USMA:45645] Converting the USA to metric

2009-08-14 Thread ezra . steinberg
Dear John Steele, The good news is that a lot of retail products seem poised for metric-only labeling. I've noticed that many beauty products use rational metric sizes, and some even list the metric amount first with US Customary listed in parentheses (and sporting some oddball amount).

[USMA:45646] Re: Converting the USA to metric

2009-08-14 Thread John M. Steele
I hope that will be the case, but the proposed amendment to the FPLA has had little change or progress since 2002 and been in complete statis since 2007 or so due to FMI. I am not very optimistic it will ever be presented to Congress for a vote. And even if the last two States agree to the

[USMA:45647] Re: Converting the USA to metric

2009-08-14 Thread Brian White
Regardless of when it's brought to a vote, I'm sure it will somehow be tied in to death panels or some other silly nonsense. :( -Original Message- From: John M. Steele jmsteele9...@sbcglobal.net Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 17:42 To: U.S. Metric Association usma@colostate.edu

[USMA:45649] Re: Converting the USA to metric

2009-08-14 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Friday 14 August 2009 20:42:49 John M. Steele wrote: I hope that will be the case, but the proposed amendment to the FPLA has had little change or progress since 2002 and been in complete statis since 2007 or so due to FMI. Who can we talk to to counter the FMI opposition? Who is holding

[USMA:45648] Re: OK Simon.....try this.

2009-08-14 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Friday 14 August 2009 16:21:18 Pierre Abbat wrote: Schools should teach metric first, and delay old units until the children have shown that they can multiply three-to-eight-digit numbers correctly by hand I wrote that while trying to hurry up for an errand. A better explanation: Students