On 04/12/2019 12:30 AM, VINAYAK KARANDIKAR via USRP-users wrote:
Hello everyone,
MATLAB still cannot find my USRP
connected to the laptop. I have built an interface called
'uhdinterface' which I use to issue commands to the USRP. But I
received an error message
Hello everyone,
MATLAB still cannot find my USRP connected to
the laptop. I have built an interface called 'uhdinterface' which I use to
issue commands to the USRP. But I received an error message saying:
"Unexpected standard exception from MEX file"
What do I do?
On 04/11/2019 04:18 PM, Kuldeep Gill wrote:
Hello Marcus,
Two radios on a single N310, there was similar question on mailing
list which is somewhat related to my issue and was asked in 2015.
Please find it attached below.
I'm not sure that you can have a configuration where you have
Hello Marcus,
Two radios on a single N310, there was similar question on mailing list which
is somewhat related to my issue and was asked in 2015. Please find it attached
below.
Hi LTP,
Ben just told me that yes, Ettus has tested things, and they work as
expected: you can have arbitrary
Hello Marcus,
Thanks for your answer.
Unless anybody else from Ettus has another suggestion today, I will contact
orders@ettus.comto get a RMA number
Serge
Le jeu. 11 avr. 2019, à 13 h 12, Marcus D. Leech
a écrit :
> On 04/11/2019 01:09 PM, Serge Malo wrote:
>
> Hello Marcus,
>
> We
On 04/11/2019 03:18 PM, Kuldeep Gill via USRP-users wrote:
Hello everyone,
I want to run two separate uhd programs accessing N310 using sfp:0 (1
gb) and sfp:1 (10 gb) independently of each other, one using cpp and
other python. Is it possible to get this kind of setup running? If
not, can I
Hello everyone,
I want to run two separate uhd programs accessing N310 using sfp:0 (1 gb) and
sfp:1 (10 gb) independently of each other, one using cpp and other python. Is
it possible to get this kind of setup running? If not, can I at least run two
instances of uhd::rx_streamer::recv() in
Hello everyone,
I have connected USRP NI 2954 R to my laptop
with a yellow LAN cable that came with the kit.
In matlab, I type the following command at the prompt:
dev = uhdinterface('init')
the following then takes place:
Unexpected Standard exception from MEX
Should still work just fine. I'm using the same approach with a UHD version
from within the last few months.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 8:00 AM Ryan Marlow via USRP-users <
usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote:
> Hey Jason,
> That post seemed to be exactly what I was looking for.
> Thanks!
> Ryan
>
>
On 04/11/2019 01:29 PM, Peng Xie wrote:
Yes, it is a brand new device that I just got three weeks ago.
So where is this out band interference came from? which kind of filter
I need to consider? And where to put this filter, e.g. between
motherboard and daughter board, or between RF in and
Yes, it is a brand new device that I just got three weeks ago.
So where is this out band interference came from? which kind of filter I
need to consider? And where to put this filter, e.g. between motherboard
and daughter board, or between RF in and daughterboard?
Thanks,
Peng
On Thu, Apr 11,
On 04/11/2019 10:30 AM, Peng Xie via USRP-users wrote:
Hi,
Recently I bought a N210 and WBX daughterboard, but found the signal
is not stable when I receive signal from 1.575GHz. I had a B200mini
before but has data lost issue, this is why I bought a N210.
I have confirmed that data does
On 04/11/2019 01:09 PM, Serge Malo wrote:
Hello Marcus,
We swapepd the d/b of our X300, and the problem followed the d/b.
See below the results of uhd_usrp_probe.
Could it "simply" be a corrupted or badly programmed eeprom?
Thanks,
Serge
My inclination would be to return it under RMA.
Hello Marcus,
We swapepd the d/b of our X300, and the problem followed the d/b.
See below the results of uhd_usrp_probe.
Could it "simply" be a corrupted or badly programmed eeprom?
Thanks,
Serge
inux; GNU C++ version 7.3.0; Boost_106501;
UHD_003.010.003.v3.10.3.0-0-gef157678
-- X300
On 04/11/2019 10:40 AM, Serge Malo via USRP-users wrote:
Hi all,
I am assembling a few X300s with UBX-160 d/b. One of them is giving me
troubles with a UBX-160 v2 d/b. The result from uhd_usrp_probe can be
found below.
Results from other X300s are normal.
We have physically disconnected and
Hey Jason,
That post seemed to be exactly what I was looking for.
Thanks!
Ryan
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:55 AM Jason Matusiak <
ja...@gardettoengineering.com> wrote:
> I haven't tried it yet, but have you looked at this blog post (I //think//
> it is still relevant today)?
>
I haven't tried it yet, but have you looked at this blog post (I //think// it
is still relevant today)?
https://corvid.io/2017/04/22/stupid-rfnoc-tricks-loopback/
From: USRP-users on behalf of Ryan Marlow
via USRP-users
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 10:51 AM
Hello all,
Quick question on a RX -> TX loopback application. Say I have a rfnoc graph
that has been connected as Radio RX -> processing block -> Radio TX so
there is no data samples streaming to/from the host. Can I just issue the
"start streaming" command to the Radio block itself or do I need
Hi all,
I am assembling a few X300s with UBX-160 d/b. One of them is giving me
troubles with a UBX-160 v2 d/b. The result from uhd_usrp_probe can be found
below.
Results from other X300s are normal.
We have physically disconnected and reconnected the problematic d/b, but we
still have the same
Hi,
Recently I bought a N210 and WBX daughterboard, but found the signal is not
stable when I receive signal from 1.575GHz. I had a B200mini before but has
data lost issue, this is why I bought a N210.
I have confirmed that data does not loss in N210, just signal is not
stable. I set frequency
Yeah, the driver tries to keep the DAC clock close to it’s max legal frequency
with the highest possible interpolation ratio from master_clock_rate.
That code doesn’t have any API access but I can show Sean how to hack it into
UHD if necessary.
> On Apr 10, 2019, at 10:57 PM, Julian Arnold via
21 matches
Mail list logo
