http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008
File src/objects.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008#newcode212
Line 212: return Object::GetPropertyWithDefinedGetter(receiver,
Since the debugger can cause GCs, you have to wrap 'receiver' in a
handle as well and have a
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008
File src/objects.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008#newcode212
Line 212: return Object::GetPropertyWithDefinedGetter(receiver,
On 2009/07/13 20:12:19, Mads Ager wrote:
> Since the debugger can cause GCs, you have to wra
On 2009/07/14 09:55:17, Yury Semikhatsky wrote:
> http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008
> File src/objects.cc (right):
> http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/7/1008#newcode212
> Line 212: return Object::GetPropertyWithDefinedGetter(receiver,
> On 2009/07/13 20:12:19, Mads Ager w
LGTM!
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34
File src/debug.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34#newcode337
Line 337: // Step in through constructs call requires no changes to the
running code.
Not your change, but: constructs -> construct
http://coderevie
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34
File src/debug.cc (right):
http://codereview.chromium.org/149542/diff/1045/34#newcode337
Line 337: // Step in through constructs call requires no changes to the
running code.
On 2009/07/14 16:36:47, Mads Ager wrote:
> Not your change, but: const
