In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis Ahrens writes
:
Are you sure your tree is up-to-date and you rebuilt everything? =
r1584
should have fixed that bug.
Iam now running r1603 and it started to happen again
13 ObjLostHeader c Content-Length:
Can you try this patch ?
Index:
Hello all.
I'm a newbie to Varnish and I'm evaluating it in order to know if/how
there is an advantage in adding it to our application flow. (well,
I'm pretty much convinced there IS an advantage so now I'm just
looking for the best way to use it).
Right now I have 2 Perlbals balancing
André Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Right now I have 2 Perlbals balancing requests to 4 apache backends.
I'm very happy with Perlbal's load balancing capabilities so I'm
looking for the best way to integrate varnish with this Perlbal +
Apache configuration. Which should come first in the
Hello all.
I'm a newbie to Varnish and I'm evaluating it in order to know if/how
there is an advantage in adding it to our application flow. (well,
I'm pretty much convinced there IS an advantage so now I'm just
looking for the best way to use it).
Right now I have 2 Perlbals balancing
Bonjour Anup,
thanks for your answer but I am able to create lfs with dd and I haven't
got yet any 64 bits machine.
dd if=/dev/zero bs=1048576 count=5000 of=test.file
5000+0 enregistrements lus
5000+0 enregistrements écrits
524288 octets (5,2 GB) copiés, 57,1358 seconde, 91,8 MB/s
ls -alh
Ok, I'll try it both ways to test.
And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request
first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process
the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
Perlbal is probably better at load-balancing since it is
How would one compare say varnich with nginx
http://wiki.codemongers.com/Nginx
where i see Nginx is not only a web server but a balancer for
http/pop/imap/smtp
and do you have any further designs for other protocols or straight http ?
___
André Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request
first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process
the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
Isn't that really the same question? Either you run
- André Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'll try it both ways to test.
And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request
first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process
the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
Dingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would one compare say varnich with nginx [...] where i see Nginx
is not only a web server but a balancer for http/pop/imap/smtp
Varnish is neither of these.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Senior Software Developer
Linpro AS - www.linpro.no
- Dingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would one compare say varnich with nginx
http://wiki.codemongers.com/Nginx
where i see Nginx is not only a web server but a balancer for
http/pop/imap/smtp
Interesting question. I have myself been looking at Nginx, mainly for its
capabilities as a
On 2007/07/02, at 14:59, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
André Cruz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And regarding my other question... Should Perlbal handle the request
first, and pass it to some varnish process or should varnish process
the request first and send only the misses to PerlBal+Apache?
So its feasible to run Nginx as the server/load balancer and varnish as
the front end cache giving potentially a decent high speed/high capacity
design.
Denis Brækhus wrote:
- Dingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would one compare say varnich with nginx
On 2007/07/02, at 15:00, Denis Brækhus wrote:
André,
If we can assume one of the reasons you want to use Perlbal is to
achieve some sort of failover capability, I would say place Perlbal
in front of Varnish. If you have another provision to handle that
and you only want to improve
Sigh, I keep going back to the engineering, and you keep personalizing
the matter and returning to your lies.
I never insulted any of you. You're personalizing the matter, and
attempting to somehow equate my bug reports with personal criticism
towards the developers.
You're wrong about the
helo
Using varnish with this url:
http://publinet.ac-montpellier.fr/publinet/Resultats?Unom_ecr=5Ubase=publi_13Utyp_aff=ResultatsUnum_cri=2Uval_cri=BUval_cri1=32405
the page is truncated beginning by
IGN=LEFTfont face='arial' class=libelleDecisionADMIS /font/TD
/TR
TR class=ligneImpaire
jean-marc pouchoulon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using varnish with this url:
http://publinet.ac-montpellier.fr/publinet/Resultats?Unom_ecr=5Ubase=publi_13Utyp_aff=ResultatsUnum_cri=2Uval_cri=BUval_cri1=32405
the page is truncated beginning by
IGN=LEFTfont face='arial'
On 02.07.2007, at 09:34, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Denis
Ahrens writes
:
Are you sure your tree is up-to-date and you rebuilt everything? =
r1584
should have fixed that bug.
Iam now running r1603 and it started to happen again
13 ObjLostHeader c
Hey guys,
I've been playing with varnish for the last few days, trying to eval it
as a squid replacement my image serving farm. I enabled it on one of the squids
friday (replacing 2 seperate squid processes on a single server), and seen
pretty awesome results:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Hedlund writes:
Hey guys,
I've been playing with varnish for the last few days, trying
to eval it as a squid replacement my image serving farm. I enabled
it on one of the squids friday (replacing 2 seperate squid processes
on a single server), and seen
- Dingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So its feasible to run Nginx as the server/load balancer and varnish
as the front end cache giving potentially a decent high speed/high
capacity design.
Well, I have no experience with Nginx whatsoever, but yes, both could be
components in a high
hi,
i'd like to implement dirty-caching using varnish.
So what is dirty caching and why use it? Think of a very unreliable
backend. If varnish can't reach it's backend, it will simply return the
last content it has (even if the content is stale). That way i can cover
hickups.
Is this possible?
Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
site is cached according to Varnish default policies. You have not
provided a single counterexample or a single snippet of VCL that could
solve the problems I have, or a single snippet of VCL that you guys are
actually using on production servers.
man vcl
Dingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So its feasible to run Nginx as the server/load balancer and varnish
as the front end cache giving potentially a decent high speed/high
capacity design.
Yes, those two will complement eachother.
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen, Linpro
On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:26, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
I never insulted any of you.
You really should go see a therapist. Just tell him or her: People
think I'm a rude idiot - please help me.
In your weblog post you called Dag-Erling and Poul-Henning thin-
skinned. Rather than disagree
25 matches
Mail list logo
