Due to our Symantec Account Manager, The Latest date for the release of NBU
6.5.3 is November 24th for General Availability.
FYI guys.
Thanks a lot
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kelly B Harris
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 4:51 AM
To
Up to and including NBU 5.1, we backed up clustered applications on HP
Serviceguard clusters, Sun clusters and even MS clusters using the
same method. Each of the physical cluster nodes was an NBU SAN Media
Server, with it's own storage unit(s), but we would also define a
storage unit for each clus
Howdy,
Likewise (depending on the environment) we have clustered masters locally
and the replicated to another site as well or for the non-highly available
we just have a single master and deal with a 4 hour outage to rebuild the
machine.
Multiple masters is just a pain in the backside.
On Wed
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Clausen, Matt R [EQ] <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm curious though…. From a Disaster Recovery perspective, are you
> replicating a master across sites to avoid the master server being the
> single point of failure? If so, what are you using to do it?
>
I've got
I'm curious though From a Disaster Recovery perspective, are you
replicating a master across sites to avoid the master server being the single
point of failure? If so, what are you using to do it?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
I agree with Ed,
I have media servers scattered around the entire country without any
issues.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Ed Wilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:56 PM, spaldam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>
>> Second, I wouldn't run master/media servers across a
Thanks Matt and /Ed.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Generally you license the number of drives in the library that will be
> participating in Vaulting operations.
>
>
>
> The Base License gives you the Vault functionality plus 4 drives that can b
I also ran into this problem as well. It's been a while, but I believe
that you have to have the fully qualified domain name of your NB master
first in the hosts file. By first I mean, ip address of master, fqdn,
and then short name. Short name before fqdn will not work.
-djb
Dwayne J. Brzozowsk
I believe that it's explicitly what Daniel requested, and I can think of
several use cases for which you would want to know this, even if you didn't
have images in the catalog for those clients any longer. ("Gone from the
catalog" isn't the same as "the tapes were destroyed or overwritten".)
In
I have issues with the nbpushdata -add command. We recently updated to 6.5 from
5.1
eng01adm# nbpushdata -add
Validating configured host names.
Contacting oldhost to get host information.
Failed to get host information from host: oldhost
Failed to validate configured host names.
Add hosts that ar
I agree totally. It's been very poorly implemented/tested.
Like I said I haven't got to the restore yet, so I couldn't say if it works
yet. I'll let you know as soon as I've tested it.
One thing I'd like to ask you. When you browse for backups via the BAR GUI on
the client, can you see the
Hi
I am currently out of the office and will return on Monday 13th October.
I will respond to your email then.
Thankyou
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Thanks everyone for your help on this question. I was finally able to use the
command Pedro sent out to pull out all of the clients that were in the Image.db.
bpcatlist | grep _ | cut -d_ -f1 | sort | uniq
Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
From: Pedro Moranga
Except that Netbackup doesn't clean up client directores for clients
with no remaining images.
This may be what Daniel wants, however.
-M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 8:22
Generally you license the number of drives in the library that will be
participating in Vaulting operations.
The Base License gives you the Vault functionality plus 4 drives that can be
used for vaulting purposes (in-line tape duplication, ejection, multiple
catalog backups, etc.)
Each addition
Hi
I am currently out of the office and will return on Monday 13th October.
I will respond to your email then.
Thankyou
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
I prefer it when commercial software I paid a lot of money for doesn't make an
intro CS student mistake. But hey, who's counting.
--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556
From: Jef
We had a problem with some daemon (nbemm I think) dumping in / (on HP-UX
as you note) so created a symlink named /core to point to an empty file
in the /usr/openv filesystem. That made it dump there instead. Of
course if something else in root dumps core it would go there too but we
preferred th
The issue is specifically that NOM causes the nbsl (NetBackup Service Layer)
daemon to dump core (which, incidentally, it does in /, at least on HP-UX,
which is just Swell).
NetBackup can function normally for backups without nbsl running, but various
pieces of the GUI interface can't work with
ls /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images works pretty well.
--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup & Recovery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556
From: Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 6:22 PM
If I remember correctly, the Vault Base license includes either 2 or 4 tape
drives. You then license each tape drive that can participate in a vault
operation beyond that. It doesn't matter if you're actually duplicating or
just ejecting.
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Be sure you have installed the Java 6.5 and the 6.5.2 patch for Java on
the client you are running the GUI.
--
Carl Stehman
Distributed Services
Pepcoholdings, Inc.
701 Ninth St NW
Washington DC 20068
202-331-6619
"Kelly B
Ken and Rusty,
That was exactly it. When I modified the vaults to do deferred eject, the
profile defaulted to a Robotic Volume Group that was not the one I
wanted. After changing it to the right one and re-ran the deferred eject,
everything worked!
Thanks again!
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thanks for the response but what I am looking for is a
> listing of all the client names that are still in the
> Image.db that have been decommissioned from our environment.
> So they are no longer in any of our active or inactive
> policies but because we backed them up within the last year
Daniel,
bpcatlist
will give you all images in database, the client name is in the begining of the
backup id.
To view a list of each hostname in the catalog:
bpcatlist | grep _ | cut -d_ -f1 | sort | uniq
regards
Pedro
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
Thanks
I already have the EEB installed, but still have the issue with the NFS in
the restore of a single document
As I have told Symantec I think this agent is very untested/undocumented and
shouldn't have had left the lab yet
Michael
2008/10/6 SimonD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I posted the same
You should use cleaning tape labels instead. Your tapes seem to be universal
cleaning tape and their labels shoud end with CU.
You can print new labels here http://tapelabels.librelogiciel.com/index.html
+--
|This was sent by [
27 matches
Mail list logo
