...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: 13 October 2009 17:20
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Hi All
Currently looking into the SAN Client / Fibre Transport clients.
Wondered if anyone else has
, 2009 1:21 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
It is possible to use a master/media as your FT media server - no
problem there. However it is not recommended.
Also make sure your on 6.5.4
-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
william.d.br...@gsk.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:22 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Simon, I think that some of the replies on the list are not quite
correct.
We
and delete this e-mail from your system.
Donaldson, Mark mark.donald...@staples.com
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/20/2009 11:13 AM
To
william.d.br...@gsk.com, VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
william.d.br...@gsk.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:22 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Simon, I think that some of the replies on the list are not quite
correct.
We
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
william.d.br...@gsk.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:22 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Simon, I think that some of the replies on the list
When is the next NetBackup Customer Forum in Roseville?
Thanks,
Reg Giacomini
Hennepin County Government
Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data
and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 13, may be
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:29 AM, reg.giacom...@co.hennepin.mn.us wrote:
When is the next NetBackup Customer Forum in Roseville?
We just had one last week so it will probably be next October for the next
one.
I'm hoping that there's another December TechDay in Roseville in December
though.
Hi All
Currently looking into the SAN Client / Fibre Transport clients.
Wondered if anyone else has implemented this on 6.5 and any pros cons?
While readin the SS Guide - it seems to imply you need a Media Server,
but does not really explain if you can use a Master Server for this
(even though a
Title: NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Simon,
afaik, a SAN Client is a Media Server that can only backup its own data.
It needs the same infrastructure as a Media Server (hba, san, zonings
and etc ...)
The difference is the license price
If it works fine or not, I still dont
.
Phone: (608)846-1442
Mobile: (608)338-3940
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 11:20 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup
Hi Simon,
I have it configured and it works quite well, especially on the really big
clients. It works just with Sun Solaris or Linux NetBackup Media Servers,
you need to have a separate Qlogic card better with more then one port, and
to have zoning done properly on your fiber switches, on the
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
13-Oct-2009 17:20
To
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Hi All
Currently looking into the SAN Client / Fibre Transport clients.
Wondered if anyone else has implemented this on 6.5 and any
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
10/13/2009 11:21 AM
To
VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] NetBackup Fibre Transport Client Backups
Hi All
Currently looking into the SAN Client / Fibre Transport clients.
Wondered if anyone else has implemented
I wanted to find out from anyone that has upgraded from 6.5.3.1 to
6.5.4 if the upgrade increased stability on EMM or were there new
bugs that are far worse than the EMM issues?
I'm upgrading the last of my media servers to 6.5.4 today.
The only issue I've come across with 6.5.4 is that if
Of
blue...@fujigreenwood.com
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 8:11 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.4 Upgrade
I wanted to find out from anyone that has upgraded from 6.5.3.1 to
6.5.4 if the upgrade increased stability on EMM or were there new bugs
Hey guys
I wanted to find out from anyone that has upgraded from 6.5.3.1 to 6.5.4 if the
upgrade increased stability on EMM or were there new bugs that are far worse
than the EMM issues?
Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jimenez, Daniel wrote:
Hey guys
I wanted to find out from anyone that has upgraded from 6.5.3.1 to 6.5.4 if
the upgrade increased stability on EMM or were there new bugs that are far
worse than the EMM issues?
Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
Hi,
The 6.5.4
, Daniel
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.4 Upgrade
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Jimenez, Daniel wrote:
Hey guys
I wanted to find out from anyone that has upgraded from 6.5.3.1 to 6.5.4 if
the upgrade increased stability on EMM or were there new bugs
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Matt
Ungaro
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 9:18 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Unfortunately you VCB proxy has to be Windows 2003. The way to make life
easiest is for it to also be a media
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
I suspect politics over technology. The LVM layer in windows, I
believe, is a port of Veritas VM. I suspect that there's a deal that
says All new tech must work on Windows - since it's hard to port from
Windows to *nix, it tends
) - Brasil
carlos_lis...@yahoo.com.br
--- Em seg, 28/9/09, apatoliya netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com escreveu:
De: apatoliya netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com
Assunto: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Para: VERITAS-BU
Hi,
I'd like to install NetBackup Administration Console for linux on my laptop.
Does it exists ? If so which DVD is it on ?
Regards
przemol
--
Bezplatne konto i limit do 100 tys. Otwierasz?
http://link.interia.pl/f2342
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to install NetBackup Administration Console for linux on my laptop.
Does it exists ? If so which DVD is it on ?
Regards
przemol
--
Bezplatne konto i limit
, 2009 8:08 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; przemol...@poczta.fm
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Administration Console for linux - whereis
it ?
On Linux you can export display from NetBackup server and use the jnbSA java
console.
Carlos Alberto L
help.
-Jonathan
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Jimenez,
Daniel
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 7:55 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.3.1
the message in error, please
let the sender know and delete the message. Thank you.
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:jmart...@intersil.com]
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 8:19 AM
To: Jimenez, Daniel; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.3.1 Socket Error
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of apatoliya
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 4:13 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Hi Guys
Does any one having idea to implement VCB with Solaris X86 master server
I have my master and media server both
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
apatoliya
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:13 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Hi Guys
Hi Guys
Does any one having idea to implement VCB with Solaris X86 master server
I have my master and media server both are same
We have aroud 50 VM and i am backing up as normal physical boxes but we are
planning to use netbackup with VMware and i came to know that for implementing
VCB
-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Matt
Ungaro
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:18 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Unfortunately you VCB proxy has
] On Behalf Of Matt
Ungaro
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:18 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup server solaris X86 with VCB
Unfortunately you VCB proxy has to be Windows 2003. The way to make life
easiest is for it to also be a media server
Hey guys
I have been attempting to restore some data off some older LTO2 tapes but
continue to receive the error below and would like to know if anyone has
encountered this issue. I was able to restore off of some tapes but not others.
9/23/2009 5:27:36 PM - begin Restore
9/23/2009 5:27:38 PM
Dear List,
My NBDB has been checkpointed 328 times since 4am Oct 20th (when
/var/log/messages has been rotated) :
[r...@backup ~]# grep checkpoint /var/log/messages | wc -l
656
[r...@backup ~]#
My questions:
- Is this a sign of problem or bad design?
- What causes checkpoint to happen?
PS This
Has anyone had experience using the RMAN crosscheck command to keep the
oracle RMAN catalogue in sync, particularly when duplication is
involved. Its highly probable that the original RMAN entry will point to
an expired image ( although the 2nd copy is still active)
Regards
Gideon
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Wheeler,
Gideon
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:15 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Oracle agent using RMAN
crosscheckcommand
Has anyone had experience using the RMAN crosscheck command
Thx. I managed to install the required the ICS package now. But when I try to
install the package NetBackup_6.5_LinuxRedhat2.6.tar.gz according to my
vendor suggestion, I encounter the following error NetBackup server software
for the linuxR_x86 platform is not on this cdrom. .
Currently
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
naymyotun
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:48 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 installation in Red Hat 6.5
Thx. I managed to install the required the ICS package now. But when I
try to install the package
We were planning to have some onsite training from Symantec,
but they managed to price themselves right out of the market.
Does anyone here have some references for good onsite
NetBackup training?
This would be for NetBackup 6.5, mixed Windows/Linux
environment, predominantly Windows however.
All:
It's Friday afternoon, so maybe you are up for a little fun.
There is a caption the cartoon contest going on related to NetBackup.
Since there is a $2500 Best Buy gift certificate up for grabs and the
deadline is tonight at midnight I thought I might mention it here.
Details are at the
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just received three packages from my vendor to
install the netbackup 6.5 on my redhat 5 development server.
( 1 )NetBackup_6.5_LinuxRedhat2.6.tar.gz
( 2 )NetBackup_6.5_ICS_LinuxX86.tar.gz
( 3 )NetBackup_6.5_CLIENTS2.tar.gz
First of all , I install the
It's true, you do need to install this library and it's documented in
the release notes. If you have yum configured you can use yum to install
the lib.
naymyotun wrote:
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just received three packages from my vendor to
install the netbackup 6.5 on my redhat
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 installation in Red Hat 6.5
It's true, you do need to install this library and it's documented in
the release notes. If you have yum configured you can use yum to install
the lib.
naymyotun wrote:
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just
To: 'WEAVER, Simon (external)'; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Standard or Enterprise
The Standard server license need an upgrade license to a full mediaserver.
There is no sku to upgrade to a SAN enterprise server. (or Enterprise Client
as the license might
I know I know it is not supported anymore and we are trying to upgrade
but business reasons do not permit it at this time. That being said we
have an issue with 5.1 MP5 and Oracle Rman backups. Seems every day we
get jobs in the activity monitor that have a PID and a Client Name but
nothing else.
...
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Smith [mailto:w...@maine.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:02 PM
To: Hudson, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP5
If using the scripted rman procedure, you can specify policy/class and
schedule
for us pushing ahead with the 6.5 upgrade.
-Original Message-
From: Wayne Smith [mailto:w...@maine.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:02 PM
To: Hudson, Steve
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 MP5
If using the scripted rman procedure
If using the scripted rman procedure, you can specify policy/class and
schedule in the allocate channel stmt(s) to cause the backup server
to use the ones you want. I can give example of syntax, if required.
Also, this can happen if the client nodename is not exactly the same
as what's defined in
Morning all,
Dealing with Symantec is NOT easy, when trying to price up a new NBU
Server.
Could anyone help me on this, because Symantec seem to be lost (Their
sales teams) on this...
I have a large NBU Environment, and I have inherited a small LAN that I
want part of the NBU Environment.
It
AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Standard or Enterprise
Morning all,
Dealing with Symantec is NOT easy, when trying to price up a new NBU Server.
Could anyone help me on this, because Symantec seem to be lost (Their sales
teams) on this...
I have a large
, August 24, 2009 2:27 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Standard or Enterprise
Morning all,
Dealing with Symantec is NOT easy, when trying to price up a new NBU
Server.
Could anyone help me on this, because Symantec seem to be lost (Their
sales teams
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER,
Simon (external)
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 11:27 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Standard or Enterprise
Morning all,
Dealing with Symantec is NOT easy, when trying to price up a new NBU Server.
Could anyone help me
I know I am going to get shot down because hpyer-v sucks( I agree) but my
company is a Microsoft shop. I was wondering if anyone is using the new client
on their hyper-v servers. If so is the advanced client needed to enable the
flashbackup-windows policy type?
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:40 PM, alexhay
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
I know I am going to get shot down because hpyer-v sucks( I agree) but my
company is a Microsoft shop. I was wondering if anyone is using the new
client on their hyper-v servers. If so is the advanced client
supplement:
Doc. ID: 318358
-George Winter
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of alexhay
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 6:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup
Yeah i read that oo. Unfortunately i have another post in here about the
windows admin console not working at 6.5.4 :(
Jim H wrote:
I am not sure about the special barccode rules, but I believe you can use a
windows administration console to add the MSEO tags.
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Reporter Tool Question
Hello all,
I had a quick question-- netbackup reporter tool (part of NOM) basically
tracks all of the things within a NBU environment, does anyone have a
list
of all items that can be tracked withinin an environment?
Or perhaps a report
I am not sure about the special barccode rules, but I believe you can use a
windows administration console to add the MSEO tags.
+--
|This was sent by jhilt...@excite.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to
Guys i'm installing and configuring MSEO 6.1 on Netbackup 6.5.4 on
Solaris 10 sparc.
This is all on the same box so no separate media servers etc. The
security server and agent for MSEO are both on the same box also.
Communication is working fine.
I'm still getting to grips with the policies
To add i'm running the gui on the unix server and redirecting it back
with X11 through SSH to a terminal server running xming. This is due to
another issue i have with the 6.5.4 remote admin gui not working on
windows :(
Cheers
Dave Markham wrote:
Guys i'm installing and configuring MSEO 6.1
I think i've found this out myself but it may be useful for people.
I think its a security issue with the console running from remote as the
admin gui invokes command line parameters when a policy is changing and
various characters could be used by a non root user running the gui to
do various
I think you are correct. I also found that you cannot add the special
barcode rules NONE and DEFAULT through the GUI any more, as the angle
brackets upset the new filters on what is allowed in the CLI commands that
it creates.
William D L Brown
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Does NBU have the capability to use multiple media types in the same
drive based on policy?
My example is a Sun T1 drive. There are two different types of tape
available. A standard tape that holds 1TB/2TB compressed the Sport
version which holds about 250gb/500gb. Depending on the data
Thanks for everyone's response on DPM. I agree it looks like a great tool for
backing up remote offices, and possibly even other Microsoft specific
applications like SQL, SharePoint, and Exchange. My real problem though, is
that we are talking about using it for our entire data center, or at
I looked into this a bit more, that error isn't exactly what you should see,
like Mr. Hilton said it should just be starting and stopping. I played
around with trying to get a similar error but I was not able to. What version
of windows are you running?
John Hink
Staff Tech Support Engineer
Hi
Does Any one having any Idea how tapes usages will increase after enable the
client side encryption ???
Right now I am using Client side Encryption and when i enable that thing my
Tape usages increase drastically so i am not confirm how many percentage will
increase after enable the
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of apatoliya
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 3:15 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NETBACKUP WITH ENCRYPTION OPTION
Hi
Does Any one having any Idea how tapes usages will increase after enable the
client side encryption ???
Right now I
Hi
I never used compression for tapes
+--
|This was sent by apatoli...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
+--
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 03:35:14PM -0400, apatoliya wrote:
I never used compression for tapes
You disabled it explicitly? It's on by default at the hardware level.
Encrypted data is the same size as non-encrypted data. But after
encryption the data is incompressible.
--
Darren
Thanks for reply
But why every time when i was enable encryption the tape usage increased that i
know with encryption throughput will degrade somewhat.
Is there something i am missing to configure ???
even i open a call with symantec they doesn't having information regarding
this issue.
I have this problem with 2 different capacity IBM 3592 media types. I
couldn't work out any way to get NetBackup to use 2 different media types on
one drive.
Luckily I have enough tape drives that I was able to set some drives to
HCART, and some to HCART2. It means I lose a certain amount of
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
apatoliya
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 3:24 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NETBACKUP WITH ENCRYPTION OPTION
Thanks for reply
But why every time when i was enable encryption the tape usage increased
that i know
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Daniel Otto dan_o...@symantec.com wrote:
When you use NBU client side encryption it removes any repeatable
patterns that the tape drive hardware compression works off. So there is
nothing to compress and so you end up using more tape space.
The only way to get
For Netbackup, I'd just use the bppllist command to list all fo the policies,
and then run it again, once for each policy to get the details. You can then
pull out the information you find relvant. I'd think you'd want to give a
listing of all systems being backed up, when they are backed
So how to I convince my VP of IT that BPM doesn't even play in the same space
as NetBackup, when the keep hearing the BPM is Enterprise Level and think
that they can replace NetBackup with it?
I'd rather not have to actually set it up and end up with two backup
enviorments to manage.
find out.
len
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of spaldam
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 5:22 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup vs. The Rest of the World
-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Len Boyle
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 2:57 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup vs. The Rest of the World
The last time I looked at DPM, it looked like a nice
Nothing else going on with the host, run all backup jobs to a disk staging
unit, then perform the duplicate - to tape.
Speed to LTO-4 (w/encryption+AES256):
Fiber Card: QLogic Corp. ISP2432-based 4Gb Fibre Channel
The bytes [io/bi] in (reading) off of a RAID-6 with 20+ 15k RPM drives:
procs
I would like to thank BOTH of you, the information provided definitely helps
out and the bpimagelist command is EXACTLY what I was looking for. Thanks again!
+--
|This was sent by terry.hash...@hdcnet.net via Backup Central.
I am currently running NetBackup 6.5.3 within my server environment.
I have Netbackup setup to e-mail me once it completes a backup so that when I
get to work in the morning I can see if there were any problems with the
backups from simply looking at my e-mail.
Here is my current
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, malhovic wrote:
I am currently running NetBackup 6.5.3 within my server environment.
I have Netbackup setup to e-mail me once it completes a backup so that when I
get to work in the morning I can see if there were any problems with the
backups from simply looking at
]
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of malhovic
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2009 8:11 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.3 E-Mail Question
I am currently running
Hi ...
i try instal netbackup with suse linux..
My ambient have a library ibm 3584,
i can see the all drivers inside suse...
but when a i try see the drivers with netbackup .. the status for the drivers
are UNUSABLE
I try to use wizard and the path not show in drives
any ideia??
On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, rodrigo.mo...@light.com.br wrote:
Hi ...
i try instal netbackup with suse linux..
My ambient have a library ibm 3584,
i can see the all drivers inside suse...
but when a i try see the drivers with netbackup .. the status for the drivers
are UNUSABLE
I try to
Hi All
Can I just clarify something please.
I want to buy a Media Server, to backup itself and 2 other Network based
Servers.
The Supplier of our software has asked what do we want
VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION
VRTS NETBACKUP MEDIA SERVER ENCRYPTION OPTION FOR
Hi,
You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing you
don't want that?
It sounds like you want a standard license:
Product:NetBackup Enterprise Server
Run get_license_key and tell them you just want more of the feature X
that you do not have (in this case, 1
[mailto:jpis...@lucidpixels.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:38 PM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Hi,
You just want a standard license then, that is for MSEO/I am guessing
you don't want
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Hi Justin
This Server is going to be part of the NetBackup environment.
So I do not want this to be a master on its own, just a Media Server
that has the ability to:
1) Attach to its own robotic drive
2) Backup
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
That means a standard media server license; if you have enterprise
netbackup then you want enterprise media server.
BUT if you are doing encryption already - and you want to encrypt your
backup
-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dean Allen
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 7:42 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external)
Cc: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Version - Quick Question !
Simon,
I don't think the term media server really exists any more, at least
we have Veritas Netbackup 6.5 version (Redhat LINUX client). Recently I
continue see messages on log file say:
14:57:14.016
[15792] 2 get_string_: protocol error - string read failed (Timer
expired)
14:57:45.001 [15792] 2
get_string_: protocol error - string read failed (Timer
expired)
Dennis Peacock wrote:
Do you show anything under /usr/openv/netbackup/volmgr/database?
I don't show a single file or directory under that directory.
Just to add my tuppence worth. I also only do full catalogs just to confirm
what we backup (checked in BAR GUI):
I wish there was a way to post a screenshot on this forum. :)
You could just upload the screenshot to something like
http://imageshack.us/and then post the link here.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
...@administaff.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Catalog backup - Issue???
I just checked by catalog tape ( I always do fulls)
And I do find /usr/openv/netbackup/db on the tape listing class and
images and other items
I am aware that with netbackup I can share a SCSI tape library with a master
and media server and that the server that can see the robot can manage the tape
mount requests.
Is it possible to use backup exec to do this? If i have 2 backup exec servers
and one tape library with 2 tape devices -
Mark,
We use the Catalog backup policy that is standard with Netbackup.
We push backups to VTL, DSSU, FSU, and tape. We have requirements for offsite
as well as onsite storage.
My issue is that we could not get the media pools back upone recovery at
Sungard.
BTW, we haven't figure out an
We are running Solaris 10 boxes, Netbackup 6.5.3.1
1 master server
4 media servers
SL8500 tape library with T10Kb drives
Just got back from a Disaster Recovery Exercise at Sungard in Philly.
What we discovered is:
Full Catalog backup does NOT backup /usr/openv/db but DOES backup
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis
Peacock
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:04 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Catalog backup - Issue???
We are running Solaris 10 boxes, Netbackup 6.5.3.1
1 master server
4 media servers
SL8500 tape library
Judy,
Do you show anything under /usr/openv/netbackup/volmgr/database?
I don't show a single file or directory under that directory.
The only thing that spurred this was when we were at DR last week and the media
pools were not there after the catalog import.
I wish there was a way to post a
Of
tsimerson
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:50 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade qs
One thing to keep in mind that it is critical to go through the steps of
running catalog consistency tests. I had tons of problems with this
(100+ GB
501 - 600 of 1828 matches
Mail list logo
