...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:47 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
yep!
I think Daniel you summarize exatly the problem:reverse lookup failing
:)
A big thankful thanks
Hi Folks,
Just a word to say that after installing Netbackup sg drivers, all is working
fine! The HP drive is well detected under Netbackup! Cool
Thanks in particular to rusman :D
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com
Hi folks,
Back again with my problems!
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with Netbackup 6.5 (which hostname is
master_server for the example) on which I'm trying to configure the clients!
I've got one client , called for instance win2003_client1 under windows 2003 on
which I installed the
Assuming you're using the standard vnetd communication, port 13782 is no
longer required as it was with version 5/5.1 ... just port 13724.
From your NetBackup server(s), run bptestbpcd -client clientname for
each client. Telnet on port 13724 will work, too, but the response is not
as clear (as
Hey!
Well I would love to run the command from your NetBackup server
bptestbpcd -client clientname but the command isn't available in
/opentv/netbackup/bin?
Is there an additionnal package to install?
Are the firewalls of server and client open in both directions for port
13724?
Well
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
Hey!
Well I would love to run the command from your NetBackup server
bptestbpcd -client clientname but the command isn't available in
/opentv/netbackup/bin?
Is there an additionnal package to install
oh thanks Michael ! :D
ok That's what I get:
#./bptestbpcd -client win2003_client1
16bptestbpcd main: Function ConnectToBPCD(win2003_client1) failed: 23
socket read failed
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com via
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:24 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??
Also, I ran again a bpcd command form the client, and I get this:
18:58:41.753 [3328.2604] 16
yep!
I think Daniel you summarize exatly the problem:reverse lookup failing
:)
A big thankful thanks
+--
|This was sent by edesam...@opentv.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Hi Folks,
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with a HP tape library (Model MSL2024 1 LTO-4
Ultrium 1760 SAS Tape Library AK378A) connected to it by SAS.
I'm running Netbackup 6.5 on the solaris server, but from the netbackup java
console, I CAN'T find the media device attached to the host through
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Hi Folks,
I've got a solaris 5.10 server with a HP tape library (Model MSL2024 1 LTO-4
Ultrium 1760 SAS Tape Library AK378A) connected to it by SAS.
I'm running Netbackup 6.5 on the solaris server
Did you install the netbackup sg driver?
Which drivers are you using?
Hmm I guess no! :(
I'm using the default SCSA installed with Solaris:
# /usr/sbin/modinfo |grep sg
142 f01cb000 1af8 97 1 sysmsg (System message redirection (fan)
222 f0a75000 2e70 231 1 sg
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-
boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of rico78
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:57 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Did you install the netbackup sg driver
AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: can't find any media device ??
Any chance you are using Sol10 U5? If so then read this article from HP
about disappearing libraries/drives.
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=encc=u
Hi,
What are people out there doing for backing up Windows 2008 64-bit R2
hosts with DFSR enabled?
Still using the stop/start dfsr scripts registry hack , or?
I tried the 'hotfix' for 7.0 it did not work.
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5.x or 7.0(?) for Windows 2008 R2 64-bit +
DFSR.
Hi,
What are people out there doing for backing up Windows 2008 64-bit R2
hosts with DFSR enabled?
Still using the stop/start dfsr scripts registry hack , or?
I tried the 'hotfix
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:28 AM, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote:
Seems the DFSR may now be in the Shadow copy Components part.
Yup. And to make it more interesting, apparently there's no such thing as
an incremental of the Shadow Copy Components - all of the backups are always
fulls.
I remember running into this and beating my head soft :(
I suspect that you downloaded a copy of the installation files from the
Symantec web site. For whatever reason, the installatin image from there
does not have all the permissions set correctly for *nix systems. It looked
like all
Hi All,
I have been trying to install Netbackup 6.5 on my Linux box and I get the
following error
*Not a perl script at ./installics line 1.*
Any idea about what went wrong??
--
Thanks,
Prabhu
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
Hi,
I think you can try the procedure here...
http://linuxplatform.blogspot.com/2010/03/netbackup-655-on-linux-redhat.html
Regards,..
+--
|This was sent by wong...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to
Thx in advance for your help
My environment is:
NBU 6.5.5 master server ( windows 2003 )
NBU 6.5.5 Client ( mssql 2005 )
Authentication type: MSSQL 2005 (mixed mode)
User Windows: NBUSQL, that as been configured with sysadmin SQL privileges
Mssql user configured on the nbu client side: Not
Hey guys
Does anyone have any good articles on Tuning Robotic Drives to Avoid Head
Thrashing? I would like to learn a little bit more on how the tuning is done,
thanks.
Daniel Jimenez
Data Protection Team
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ulises
Rodriguez
Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:37 PM
To: 'VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 / Exchange 2007.
Hello All,
I am backing up the full exchange information store and the transaction
logs
Hello All,
I am backing up the full exchange information store and the transaction logs
are not getting cleaned up after a full backup. Has anyone seen this issue?
Running Win2k3 Netbackup 6.5.
Exchange 2007 Win2k3 64bit.
Any ideas?
Thank you,
Ulises R.
Dear List,
My NBDB has been checkpointed 328 times since 4am Oct 20th (when
/var/log/messages has been rotated) :
[r...@backup ~]# grep checkpoint /var/log/messages | wc -l
656
[r...@backup ~]#
My questions:
- Is this a sign of problem or bad design?
- What causes checkpoint to happen?
PS This
Has anyone had experience using the RMAN crosscheck command to keep the
oracle RMAN catalogue in sync, particularly when duplication is
involved. Its highly probable that the original RMAN entry will point to
an expired image ( although the 2nd copy is still active)
Regards
Gideon
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Wheeler,
Gideon
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 10:15 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Oracle agent using RMAN
crosscheckcommand
Has anyone had experience using the RMAN crosscheck command
Thx. I managed to install the required the ICS package now. But when I try to
install the package NetBackup_6.5_LinuxRedhat2.6.tar.gz according to my
vendor suggestion, I encounter the following error NetBackup server software
for the linuxR_x86 platform is not on this cdrom. .
Currently
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
naymyotun
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:48 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 installation in Red Hat 6.5
Thx. I managed to install the required the ICS package now. But when I
try to install the package
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just received three packages from my vendor to
install the netbackup 6.5 on my redhat 5 development server.
( 1 )NetBackup_6.5_LinuxRedhat2.6.tar.gz
( 2 )NetBackup_6.5_ICS_LinuxX86.tar.gz
( 3 )NetBackup_6.5_CLIENTS2.tar.gz
First of all , I install the
It's true, you do need to install this library and it's documented in
the release notes. If you have yum configured you can use yum to install
the lib.
naymyotun wrote:
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just received three packages from my vendor to
install the netbackup 6.5 on my redhat
@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 installation in Red Hat 6.5
It's true, you do need to install this library and it's documented in
the release notes. If you have yum configured you can use yum to install
the lib.
naymyotun wrote:
Hi Guru,
I m a netbackup beginner. I just
Dennis Peacock wrote:
Do you show anything under /usr/openv/netbackup/volmgr/database?
I don't show a single file or directory under that directory.
Just to add my tuppence worth. I also only do full catalogs just to confirm
what we backup (checked in BAR GUI):
I wish there was a way to post a screenshot on this forum. :)
You could just upload the screenshot to something like
http://imageshack.us/and then post the link here.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
...@administaff.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Catalog backup - Issue???
I just checked by catalog tape ( I always do fulls)
And I do find /usr/openv/netbackup/db on the tape listing class and
images and other items
Mark,
We use the Catalog backup policy that is standard with Netbackup.
We push backups to VTL, DSSU, FSU, and tape. We have requirements for offsite
as well as onsite storage.
My issue is that we could not get the media pools back upone recovery at
Sungard.
BTW, we haven't figure out an
We are running Solaris 10 boxes, Netbackup 6.5.3.1
1 master server
4 media servers
SL8500 tape library with T10Kb drives
Just got back from a Disaster Recovery Exercise at Sungard in Philly.
What we discovered is:
Full Catalog backup does NOT backup /usr/openv/db but DOES backup
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis
Peacock
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:04 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN.EDU
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Catalog backup - Issue???
We are running Solaris 10 boxes, Netbackup 6.5.3.1
1 master server
4 media servers
SL8500 tape library
Judy,
Do you show anything under /usr/openv/netbackup/volmgr/database?
I don't show a single file or directory under that directory.
The only thing that spurred this was when we were at DR last week and the media
pools were not there after the catalog import.
I wish there was a way to post a
Of
tsimerson
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:50 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade qs
One thing to keep in mind that it is critical to go through the steps of
running catalog consistency tests. I had tons of problems with this
(100+ GB
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade qs
One thing to keep in mind that it is critical to go through the steps of
running catalog consistency tests. I had tons of problems with this
(100+ GB catalog space). And never got the catalog into a state that we
could actually upgrade our 5.1 MP7
Simon,
Yes, I did choose a completely new name for the master server.
Tom
+--
|This was sent by t...@tjsimerson.org via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade qs
Simon,
Yes, I did choose a completely new name for the master server.
Tom
+--
|This was sent by t...@tjsimerson.org via Backup Central.
|Forward
One thing to keep in mind that it is critical to go through the steps of
running catalog consistency tests. I had tons of problems with this (100+ GB
catalog space). And never got the catalog into a state that we could actually
upgrade our 5.1 MP7 in place. It would have taken us an
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade qs
One thing to keep in mind that it is critical to go through the steps of
running catalog consistency tests. I had tons of problems with this
(100+ GB catalog space). And never got the catalog into a state that we
I'm currently running NBU 5.0 MP7 On Solaris 9 on an E220R
End goal is to get to NBU 6.5.4 on Solaris 10 on a new T5220.
Network based clients, mix of Win200, Win2003, Solaris 8
My upgrade path is going to be as follows. Does anyone see any issues
with this?
Build Sol10 on new box
Install NBU
by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
07/08/2009 04:59 AM
Please respond to
dave.mark...@fjserv.net
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade q's
I'm currently running NBU 5.0 MP7 On Solaris 9 on an E220R
End
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
07/08/2009 04:59 AM
Please respond to
dave.mark...@fjserv.net
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 upgrade q's
I'm currently running NBU 5.0 MP7 On Solaris 9
] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2009 12:38 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 DSSU fragmentation
It's not just a fragmentation issue - a defrag'ed file system may also give you
poor destage performance.
A bunch of people have reported this issue
Hi
Im having problems with my diskstage getting to fragmented and thus getting
very slow performance when duplicating to tape. Running defrag isnt an option
since the files are reaplced fequently and the defrag job will take to long
time to run.
From what Ive seen and read, this is a major
owiking wrote:
Im having problems with my diskstage getting to fragmented and thus getting
very slow performance when duplicating to tape. Running defrag isnt an option
since the files are reaplced fequently and the defrag job will take to long
time to run. From what Ive seen and read,
It's not just a fragmentation issue - a defrag'ed file system may also give
you poor destage performance.
A bunch of people have reported this issue but so far nobody has found the
smoking gun. It's an issue on multiple platforms as well.
.../Ed
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:10 AM, owiking
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
Thanks for the quick responses. Because those are production boxes, we can only
reboot them during the planned system maintenance weekend.
--
Cathy Savage
Backup Operations Team
I'm new to this and hope you all can help. We're planning the install of this
patch on our HP-UX media servers and would like to know if a reboot is required
once this patch is installed. I've read the release notes and installation
instructions but didn't see anything regarding a reboot.
As
No reboot required.
Stop NBU; apply the Hot Fix; start NBU.
Steve
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Savage, Catherine catherine.sav...@uscg.mil
wrote:
I'm new to this and hope you all can help. We're planning the install of
this patch on our HP-UX media servers and would like to know if a
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Steve Fogarty
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 2:29 PM
To: Savage, Catherine
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
No reboot required.
Stop NBU; apply the Hot Fix
: patrick.swee...@axcelis.com [mailto:patrick.swee...@axcelis.com]
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 2:32 PM
To: Steve Fogarty; Savage, Catherine
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
Of course, if the reason you can only reboot
From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 12:55 PM
To: 'Michitsch, John'
Cc: 'VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu'
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
Wow.
Can you get some solid metrics on the speed drop?
Is it only Exchange
, John [mailto:jmich...@gannett.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2009 10:04 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
We upgraded out master and two media servers to 6.5.3.1 (in order to backup a
standby Exchange CCR node and Windows 2008) this week and our
: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Preston, Doug
dpres...@landam.commailto:dpres...@landam.com wrote:
There are a lot of your customers that would rather have a 32bit install
instead
, February 21, 2009 9:04 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1
(6.5.3.1)
We upgraded out master and two media servers to 6.5.3.1 (in order to
backup a standby Exchange CCR node and Windows 2008) this week and our
full backups
Correct, but we are not doing the Exchange or 2008 piece yet, just OS level
backups.
From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com [mailto:judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com]
Sent: 21 February, 2009 10:49 AM
To: Michitsch, John; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Preston, Doug dpres...@landam.com wrote:
There are a lot of your customers that would rather have a 32bit install
instead of having to install all new machines twice.
3 times. 6.5 base, 6.5.3 patch kit, then 6.5.3.1 security patch. Without
LiveUpdate, I
...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:18 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
I'm sorry, I know that we can install the hotfix on the clients as long as the
master and media has it. I wanted to know
...@administaff.com; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1
(6.5.3.1)
NetBackup 6.5.3.1 Hotfix is not cumulative unless the LiveUpdate package
is used. If you use the patch containers instead of LU, you must have
6.5.3 installed as a base
: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:25 PM
To: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
NetBackup 6.5.3.1 Hotfix is not cumulative unless the LiveUpdate package is
used. If you use the patch containers
; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1
(6.5.3.1)
Bill, I trust that this security fix will be rolled into the 6.5.4
release, correct?
--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer
gabriel.rosenkoet...@radian.biz
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
Correct all these 6.5.3.1 corrections are in 6.4. In fact anyone getting the
6.5.4 beta next week will have them. We have processes that assure this with
audits.
From: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel [mailto:gabriel.rosenkoet
Can someone clarify for me if we need to install this on the master and media
only or all clients as well?clients too.
+--
|This was sent by xsp...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.5 Release Update 3 Hotfix 1 (6.5.3.1)
Can someone clarify for me if we need to install this on the master and
media only or all clients as well?clients too.
+--
|This was sent by xsp...@yahoo.com via
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:17 PM, X_S netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
Can someone clarify for me if we need to install this on the master and
media only or all clients as well?clients too.
The standing rule of thumb is that the master always has to be the highest
version, then media
://support.veritas.com/docs/319637
Thanks Bill Coleman
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 2:32 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Bill Coleman bill_cole...@symantec.comwrote:
NetBackup 6.5.3.1 Hotfix is not cumulative unless the LiveUpdate package
is used. If you use the patch containers instead of LU, you must have 6.5.3
installed as a base.
Since 6.5.3 is not a base release either,
Does anybody know if this is cumulative?
Or if you have to do 6.5.3 AND 6.5.3.1 when installing new clients?
Document ID: 317828
http://support.veritas.com/docs/317828
http://support.veritas.com/docs/317828 E-Mail this document to a
colleague
I have a server running Netbackup 6.5 on Windows Server 2003 x64, and a Quantum
Scalar 50. I have the robot and both drives in the Scalar visible in
Netbackup, I can move tapes around with the Scalar's web interface, and if I
manually move a tape into the Passthrough ports on the Scalar, I
I have a server running Netbackup 6.5 on Windows Server 2003
x64, and a Quantum Scalar 50. I have the robot and both
drives in the Scalar visible in Netbackup, I can move tapes
around with the Scalar's web interface, and if I manually
move a tape into the Passthrough ports on the Scalar,
bob944 wrote:
I don't know your hardware, but are you selecting Empty media sccess
port prior to updating in the inventory GUI?
If the Scalar 50 is like some other small scalar that I saw in a demo,
when you put tapes in the slid-out magazine, a little dialog comes up on
the control
-fo...@backupcentral.com
Sent by: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
02/03/2009 01:16 PM
Please respond to
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
To
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 and Quantum Scalar 50
bob944 wrote:
I don't know your
libraries.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of thgreatoz
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 1:49 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 and Quantum Scalar 50
Anyone ever seen this before?
I have 4 servers, 2 old and 2 new, all run 6.5.2a, now 6.5.3 as of this
morning. I see this error occur in the logs a few moments after midnight,
every night. I did notice mt-st was not installed on the machines that
were getting this error, so I installed that
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Anyone ever seen this before?
I have 4 servers, 2 old and 2 new, all run 6.5.2a, now 6.5.3 as of this
morning. I see this error occur in the logs a few moments after midnight,
every night. I did notice mt-st was not installed on the machines
here is a tech note that help me
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/279554.htm
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have issues with the nbpushdata -add command. We recently updated to 6.5 from
5.1
eng01adm# nbpushdata -add
Validating configured host names.
Contacting oldhost to get host information.
Failed to get host information from host: oldhost
Failed to validate configured host names.
Add hosts that
. Brzozowski
Sr. Solaris Systems Administrator
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 12:28 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 New upgrade
Yup, that was basically my point. If the robot does not see the barcodes, they
won't show up for NBU.
But I guess I never asked if the robot actually had a barcode reader.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup
: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Updating the tapes
I have a Quantum Value loader that has an 8 tape magazine. I have
replaced all 8 tapes with fresh ones. I have tried to update the tapes
by right clicking the Media and selecting Inventory Robot and selecting
Update Volume Configuration
I am running Netbackup 6.5 on a windows server. I was trying to verify
the backups, by trying to restore a file, but I keep getting an error
that reads:
Error! Client is not validated to perform the requested operation.
There is no number associated with this error.
I have a Quantum Value loader that has an 8 tape magazine. I have
replaced all 8 tapes with fresh ones. I have tried to update the tapes
by right clicking the Media and selecting Inventory Robot and selecting
Update Volume Configuration, but it just runs and says that the robot
and the tapes are
: Obenschain, Charles T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2008 9:55:40 AM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Client is not validated
I am running Netbackup 6.5 on a windows server. I was
trying to verify the backups, by trying to restore a file, but I
Does the robot itself show the barcodes on the media? You can use
volmgr\bin\robtest to check, s s to show slots.
If the barcodes are not showing up netbackup will not know this is different
media from what you removed.
Did you use netbackup to eject the media from the robot?
This is usually caused by a request to restore files to a client other than the
one that made the request and the request did not come from the root user (on
UNIX) or the administrator (on Windows) on a NetBackup server.
+--
I also have this same problem and all Symantec has had me do is upgrade.
Fist from 6.5 to 6.5.2 and now to 6.5.2A which was supposed to fix the issu,
but it did not.
I have tried recreating the backup several times.
i have noticed that the backup is basically good and that you can recover
Hi there,
I have a similar problem. bpbrm log complains about open file license not
registered. This was a red herring, I backed up an open file without any
issues. Can someone recommend any further debug that I can look at?
Job: 1 - hung
8/11/2008 8:59:10 AM - estimated 0 kbytes needed
Hi,
I hope I didn't hijack this thread with my problem. The job ended up failing
with: Error nbjm(pid=4292) nbrb status: RB deallocated orphaned resources
I used the google and found this tech note:
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/295012.htm
Although it doesn't really apply to a
When I start the catalog backup, it creates 4 jobs.
1. A 'DBM Query' to verify the image.
2. The second job seems to be staging and validating inside
/usr/openv/netbackup/staging
3. The third job seems to simply be gaining the resources to one of
the tape drives
4. mounts, positions and writes
Hi
I have just upgraded to 6.5.1 and Solaris 10 for the master server.
Yesterday I have deleted two clients from a policy, and the policy ran
last night and this morning the activity monitor showed that it ran a
backup for both clients?
Thanks
Gordon Findlay
IT Systems Manager
I have had this issue too
Unfortunately only known solution is to restart netbackup
Regards
Michael
2008/5/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
I have just upgraded to 6.5.1 and Solaris 10 for the master server.
Yesterday I have deleted two clients from a policy, and the policy ran
Very interesting, anyone keep a list of known issues with 6.5.1?
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Michael Graff Andersen wrote:
I have had this issue too
Unfortunately only known solution is to restart netbackup
Regards
Michael
2008/5/16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
I have just
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 AM, Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Very interesting, anyone keep a list of known issues with 6.5.1?
I'm sure Veritas is. :-)
6.5.2 is imminent anyway. I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of
the known issues with 6.5.1 won't affect the vast
a
different problem, but this is where I'd look first.
Ken Zufall
Technical Analyst
D660C
The Goodyear Tire Rubber Company
GTN 446.0592 or 330.796.0592
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/16/2008 05:25 AM
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 Policy
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo
