Re: Current state of the application

2009-03-18 Thread TheDO
Thank you for responding with a detailed explanation, Dirk. I came here looking for this exact information, and I'm glad to hear that Versions will be updated again soon. It's working great, but like anything, it needs ongoing love. :-) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You re

Re: Feature Request: Enable/Disable Bookmarks

2009-03-20 Thread TheDO
Maybe the feature could be automatic. If a particular bookmark hasn't been touched in a while, it goes into an "idle" state and no further lookups are done with it until it is used again. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: How does Versions Commit newly created / deleted files & directories

2009-03-27 Thread TheDO
Can you tell us which application? Subversion just treats OS X packages as folders, ignoring the flag that makes OS X treat the folder as a package. While this looks ugly, it should work fine most of the time. I commit OmniGraffle documents to my repositories all of the time, and they come throug

Re: Change credentials for local bookmark

2009-03-27 Thread TheDO
Unfortunately, Versions doesn't follow expected convention by offering standard menu items for editing bookmarks, but it's still easy. You can either right- (or control-) click on the repository and choose Edit Bookmark... or with the bookmark highlighted, you can click the Action menu (has icon o

Re: Change credentials for local bookmark

2009-03-27 Thread TheDO
Disregard my comment about the standard menu items. Duh. I completely missed the Bookmarks menu. LOL I never use it. But the rest of the info is the same use the Edit Bookmark... menu item. On Mar 27, 5:34 pm, TheDO wrote: > Unfortunately, Versions doesn't follow expected conve

Re: Subversion 1.6

2009-03-28 Thread TheDO
It's great to hear 1.6 support is coming. I want to put out my concern around the bundling of the subversion client into Versions.app, and not supporting external subversion clients. I know this has been discussed before, but can someone in the know remind me (and possibly others) why Versions is

Re: Can't install demo --- says trial period expired

2009-03-31 Thread TheDO
If you're looking for a quality GUI SVN client, Versions is your thing. Just click the Buy button and enjoy. I'm a happy customer of 4 licenses. On Mar 30, 8:58 am, "john.patrick.gal...@gmail.com" wrote: > It may have been previously installed as I inherited this Mac. > > Don't have the time/

Re: UI requests

2009-04-02 Thread TheDO
On Apr 1, 8:40 am, Keenan wrote: > I would like to: > - reduce the size of the context menu. (add local differences, but > remove most of the entries that are available in the toolbar.) The toolbar is fully customizable, and can be hidden, so it wouldn't make sense to remove items from the con

Re: Paid for Versions - can't register, no response from support.

2009-04-04 Thread TheDO
Dimitri, I respectfully disagree with your conclusions. 1) I've had great support from MadeBySofa. They did take about 3 days to respond soon after public beta release of Versions, so that was understandable. 2) I've had no trouble registering Versions on 6 different computers, 4 different intern

Re: svn 1.6 support?

2009-04-04 Thread TheDO
It's been a while since Versions was last updated (4 months), so I personally expect an update to come shortly. The fact that they integrate Subversion into Versions and don't support external svn installations does complicate matters. I, too, would like Versions to use my external installation (f

Re: FR: Open with... as context menu entry

2009-04-04 Thread TheDO
Another workaround is to just grab a file (or files) and drag them from Versions onto the Dock icon for the application you want to open them in. Or, grab the file, Cmd-Tab to switch to Finder, hover over Applications folder, and then drop onto the application you want to open them with. Sounds l

Re: New Version

2009-04-20 Thread TheDO
I agree. Did they hit a wall in terms of complexity with something? I really hope Sofa can maintain open communication with its customers with regards to updates to Versions. Stagnancy kills off applications. /TheDO/ On Apr 16, 2:55 am, Eric wrote: > When is the new version coming? >

Re: Versions 1.0.4 Beta (Subversion 1.6 support)

2009-04-27 Thread TheDO
Exciting development, but should I assume this is only a stop-gap measure to keep the v1.6 people at bay? It's been a long time for what seems to be a minor upgrade for those of us not yet using 1.6. I'm happy with Versions in its current state, but would like to see some improvements to the inte

Re: Versions 1.0.4 Beta (Subversion 1.6 support)

2009-05-17 Thread TheDO
Versions supports that. The current stable release gives you v1.4.6 or v1.5.4. /TheDO/ On May 16, 2:49 pm, Shmaff wrote: > Hi Versions Team, > > I'm very interested in your product. I've tried it as a Trial in the > past and it seemed to work great! I've been away from

Re: We just released the Version 1.0.5 update

2009-09-03 Thread TheDO
I have a colleague running 10.5.8 that updated and now Versions is re- launching itself (the full gui) repeatedly. Here's what she said in her email to me: "I’ve just downloaded the new update for Versions. It has been “installing and relaunching” for a long time now (almost an hour). There is al

Versions v1.0.5 - my feedback

2009-09-03 Thread TheDO
"Waiting for transactions to finish..." Like others, after installing the update and trying to relaunch, I was told that Versions was waiting for transactions to finish, even though there were none. Zero GUI improvements I

Re: Versions v1.0.5 - my feedback

2009-09-03 Thread TheDO
FYI - the same problem happened when installing Versions on 10.4.11. Had to force-quit to complete the install. On Sep 3, 11:45 am, TheDO wrote: > "Waiting for transactions to finish..." > > Like others, after installing the update and

Re: We just released the Version 1.0.5 update

2009-09-03 Thread TheDO
Just for clarification on my previous post... it was "relaunching" itself... that was my interpretation of what my colleague was telling it. The dialog says "Installing and relaunching...", which wouldn't go away. On Sep 3, 11:26 am, TheDO wrote: > I have a c

Re: Versions 1.0.6 coming

2009-09-14 Thread TheDO
Just FYI, the problem hasn't affected me on any of my computers... 2 PowerPC (10.4 and 10.5) and I Intel (10.5). On Sep 13, 5:16 am, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Hi all, > > We've tracked down the cause of the following issue that some of you > are running into with Versions 1.0.5: > > - Really high CP

BUG - Commit sheet stays open, but application is usable

2009-10-07 Thread TheDO
This has happened to me twice now. Snow Leopard, Versions 1.0.6 1. begin a commit 2. switch to another app 3. when returning to Versions, the "Committing..." sheet is still open. The candy-cane progress bar is not moving and is grayed out. 4. The Cancel and Transcript buttons on the sheet are no

Re: Versions won't quit in Snow Leopard

2009-10-07 Thread TheDO
fixed. I, too, want to recommend Versions. TheDO On Oct 7, 2:19 pm, Kevin Powick wrote: > On Oct 7, 1:23 pm, Jay wrote: > > > Well, it will quit now - that's good. However, the "Versions > > unexpectedly quit" dialog is cropping up more than ever. And, since

Re: Auto Expanding Directories

2009-10-07 Thread TheDO
etween repositories after collapsing the root folder. (To the Versions team, I recommend that this behaviour be disabled... honour the user's last change) One tip you might find useful is option-clicking the disclosure triangle. Click once and it collapses all folders. Click again and it expand

Re: BUG - Commit sheet stays open, but application is usable

2009-10-08 Thread TheDO
Thanks Jasper. I'm using the Dock preference that auto-hides all apps except the current one. Keeps my workspace nice and clean and now I realize that this issue with Versions cropped up as soon as I started using that. Thanks for your quick attention to this. /TheDO/ On Oct 8, 1:31 am,

Fix & Release, repeat

2009-10-26 Thread TheDO
I'd really like to see a quicker release timeline for Versions. There's little glitches that go weeks without being fixed, and yet impact the efficiency of the application on a daily basis. For example, there's a known bug with Versions running on Snow Leopard where visible sheets fail to disappea

Re: Disable Show Local Changes for new files (or clearer error)

2009-10-26 Thread TheDO
igh-profile customer. (hope you don't mind the plug, Marc) :-) /TheDO/ On Oct 21, 3:12 pm, Marc Liyanage wrote: > I added some files to my working copy but didn't yet commit. > > When I run Show Local Changes, I get a file not found error message: > > Can

Re: Once again, updates anytime soon?

2009-11-01 Thread TheDO
bar on the Mac. /TheDO/ On Oct 30, 9:34 am, Marijn Huizendveld wrote: > Hi guys, > > I really hate to ask this question again but I feel I have to. Is a   > new significant release to be expected anytime soon? > > The reason why I'm asking is I finally convinced some free

Re: Update All Repositories

2009-12-29 Thread TheDO
The modal approach to the Update operation is somewhat restrictive, yes. What it does allow is to see the verbose transcript of the update operation as it happens. How do you see that working if multiple repositories updated simultaneously. It's important to remember that Versions is a GUI for Su

open newly-added file from Timeline

2010-01-14 Thread TheDO
I find the Timeline great at monitoring the changes made to various open-source projects. However, for newly-added files, clicking the file doesn't do anything. Modified files open up in FileMerge since it has something to compare against (the previous version). Versions attempts to do something wi

Versions Release Schedule

2010-04-22 Thread TheDO
I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies as a revenue-generating product, nor am I asking, but I do wonder if a lack of revenue from licenses is resulting in the slow update schedule. It seems to take weeks for simple little fixes to be incorporated into the application

Re: Versions Release Schedule

2010-05-05 Thread TheDO
Two weeks. no response to this message, and it's still on the front page of the Versions Google Group is Versions really that hurting for a bustling user base? On Apr 22, 8:11 pm, TheDO wrote: > I'm not sure how well Versions is performing for the parent companies &

Re: Deleted file in repo still appears in working copy?

2010-05-05 Thread TheDO
On May 5, 1:44 am, Cue wrote: > On Apr 28, 5:50 pm, Ray wrote: > > > I've never seen this happen.  What you describe is pretty basic use of SVN, > > so I suspect something else is at play here.  Versions successfully updates > > my working copies. > > > When you did this, did you check what was

Versions getting dusty

2010-08-15 Thread TheDO
tem, rather than limiting itself to Subversion? I feel it's important to communicate about products that we are passionate about. I wholeheartedly hope that Versions gets the love it needs from its developers. Three cheers for Sofa and company. You can do it. /TheDO/ -- You received this message

Re: Sofa Acquires Versions

2010-10-17 Thread TheDO
Was Pico's involvement the cause of the long delays between updates to Versions? Sofa claims they will be breathing renewed resources and development into Versions. I'm happy to see _something_ happening. Now, to deliver on that promise... :-) On Oct 7, 2:56 am, Dirk Stoop wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: PPC Updates

2011-02-27 Thread TheDO Webmaster
arn the use the tools of our trade without the fancy interfaces sometimes. A little Terminal knowledge can let you continue to use these machines with equal power. /TheDO/ On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:17 PM, kiddailey wrote: > I have the hardware. Eight machines to be exact. Three of which

Re: The architecture of versions installation

2011-09-08 Thread TheDO Webmaster
r box. Push-pull between them. I used to be a die-hard Subversion fan. /TheDO/ On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Imaje wrote: > Hello, > > I am tasking myself to get into Versions in order to improve our > workflow for our small two-man team however, I cannot get my head > arou

Re: Subversion 1.7

2011-10-17 Thread TheDO Webmaster
The Subversion binary is embedded in Versions. A new release of Versions is required to get the latest Subversion. 1.7 is backwards compatible with earlier versions, so there should be no compatibility issues. Release Notes: http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html /TheDO/ On