[videoblogging] Re: Live!

Yeah, lots of quirks in VJ software, and a lot of fun. Lots of non-live preparation required to do something amazing live. Ive always had a fascination with the idea of video instruments, with video being created and manipulated in the same ways as music; mixing, sampling, sequencing, and synthesi

[videoblogging] Re: Live!

Here's a few more on the programming side of things: for Windows: http://www..org/tiki-index.php Nodebox for Mac: http://nodebox.net/code/index.php/Home For the non-programming-minded, heres a few recent VJ apps that are free and fairly new, I havent had a chance to try them myself yet:

[videoblogging] Re: Live!

Ahh I remembered what I was thinking of, its not online but rather an app: http://www.neuromixer.com/product-avdrum.php# I recommend watching the demo video on that page to get an idea of just one possible technique, in this case with clips of video treated like audio samples, and then sequenced

[videoblogging] Re: Live!

Oh I cant stop waffling on this topic, just a few more things: Live video can be incorporated into the mix. So you can have a ombination of live feeds from 1 or more cameras, and pre-recorded clips, mixed together in various ways, with various effects. Can be used for anything from crowd shots to

[videoblogging] Re: Live!

around the 27/8/07 Steve Watkins mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: Live! that: >Ive always had a fascination with the idea of video instruments, with >video being created and manipulated in the same ways as music; mixing, >sampling, sequencing, and synthesizing. David Wolf (who

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live!

A tip for anyone who starts to explore the non-flash software: use photo-jpeg (at 75% or higher quality) as the codec for the video files. Frame-based codecs are much easier on the processor, and photo-jpeg (though some prefer apple motion jpeg A or B) has emerged as a good balance between perform

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live!

Oh and more for the programming-minded: Quartz Composer (free in the Apple Developer Tools) and Processing are two free options for building your own live video applications. vjcentral.com has good forums discussing this stuff - keep in mind its mostly from the point of view of live vj use. Brook

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live!

Thanks Steve, I've saved all the emails from this thread for future resource Mark overlander.tv Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ahh I remembered what I was thinking of, its not online but rather an app: http://www.neuromixer.com/product-avdrum.php# I

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live!

Cheers Adrian Found some local guys doing VJing down here in Tasmania - 313RGB Mark overlander.tv Adrian Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: around the 27/8/07 Steve Watkins mentioned about [videoblogging] Re: Live! that: >Ive always had a fascination

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live!

around the 28/8/07 Mark Shea mentioned about Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live! that: >Found some local guys doing VJing down here in Tasmania - 313RGB excellent. next time you're in melbourne let me know, can hook you up with David who can then show you the local VJ scene. -- cheers Adri

[videoblogging] Re: Live Streaming

also, If you do live streaming can I pester you with questions? Be sure to post recordings or videos for later viewing and study. thanks John by hammer and hand by pen and thought by cam and light

[videoblogging] Re: Live Streaming

Technical: Blogtv, sound was intermittent Justin, sound & video was stalling out, herky jerky Contect: Fascinating. I'll watch more. Speeded up might be alright for entertainment, but I'd rather see real-time, maybe offer both. Also, I'd like to see and hear more about how you mix colors, and se

[videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Robyn Tippins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've used uStream and it worked well. I have also done Quicktime Server > w/Quicktime Broadcaster, which was a breeze as well. I tried uStream for That's interesting, Robyn. This is the first time I think I've

[videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Kath O'Donnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > another option u may want to consider is a streaming box such as slingbox. > so similarly, you could connect your camera output to the input of the > slingbox and let it handle the streaming (since that's what it's

[videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

Tom What it sounds like you are trying to do can be seen here: I sent an email to you off list. Yahoo mail is still having problems, check your spam folder. There are a lot of free alternatives, but with most, as soon as you start earning income/charging o

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Streaming

Hi John, I have worked a good bit in live, and am very very interested in the platfrom... am happy to help where ever I can! kathryn synchronis.tv's inaugural series "35" is available on itunes. Kathryn Velvel Jones synchronis.tv [EMAIL PROTECTED] 917-992-2217 On Jan 14, 2008, at 8:04 PM

[videoblogging] Re: Live Internet Video

This is a great article John, It is giving me addition ideas about presenting information and expanding the use of video in all forms of education. One of the other great things about what you do is that it is a form of technique preservation. There is an Archivist somewhere down the road who wil

[videoblogging] Re: Live Internet Video

Gena Writes: >>a form of technique preservation.<< Yes, after each FlashMeeting session I catalog and index the sections and ideas on a webpage http://historichomeworks.com/hhw/conf/vidconf.htm and link directly to those sections within the video recording. Then the search engines can bring vis

[videoblogging] Re: Live Conference about videoblogging?

There is a long-standing tradition among vloggers to meet up Tuesdays and Saturdays via the FlashMeeting video conferencing service. Right now no one is booking the meetings routinely, but you could. There is a FlashMeeting server that is open for use by anyone. It is at at the Open University's O

Re: [videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

I've used uStream and it worked well. I have also done Quicktime Server w/Quicktime Broadcaster, which was a breeze as well. I tried uStream for streaming video into SecondLife (for the main BlogHer sessions this year) and the company we were using for our build in SL could only accept Quicktime

Re: [videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

Re QT Streaming Server being "expensive": Darwin Streaming Server is, basically, QT Streaming Server, but uncoupled from OSX Server, open source (free), and runs on multiple platforms: http://developer.apple.com/opensource/server/streaming/index.html Brook -- _

Re: [videoblogging] Re: live video streaming

On 10/14/07, tom_a_sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > based on what I read only one person can view the feed at a time :( oh :( sorry I forgot about that, I should have checked more closely. (we used it one at a time) > > > > I used to do internet radio using ogg vorbis (& others prior to

[videoblogging] Re: Live Video Platforms - Feature Comparison

Nice round-up, Kfir. I replied on your site. :) Bill http://BillCammack.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "kfirpravda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello all, > I've done some feature comparison

[videoblogging] Re: Live Webcam on Hollywood Blvd.

Try justin.tv or I like Mogulus.com In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, choco scamter wrote: > > Scenario: > What I normally do is plug in a tripod mounted webcam into the usb 2.0 slot > in the laptop (1.9Ghz, 1.99GB- RAM), turn on the Sprint mobile broadband and > start showing using Yahoo Mes

[videoblogging] Re: Live internet video questions and thoughts

Cool :) Its not really clear to me where Im going with creating video myself, there are massive gaps in my abilities. But Ive had a decade long fascination with realtime computer animation, from virtual pupeteering to virtual bands that play along with the music, mixed with real live video in ways

[videoblogging] Re: Live internet video questions and thoughts

I strongly suggest you try Mogulus with Flash Media Encoder (FME). Obviously, the things that make for good recorded video hold true for live as well (effective lighting, good white balance, good manual focusing, appropriate camera exposure, good audio, etc...) FME on it's own is interesting i

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Webcam on Hollywood Blvd.

You could also try QuickTime broadcaster or windows media version I can't think of the name. Ben Sent from my iPhone On Mar 15, 2009, at 8:40 AM, danielmcvicar wrote: > Try justin.tv or I like Mogulus.com > > > In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, choco scamter wrote: >> >> Scenario: >> What

[videoblogging] Re: Live stream blog from an event

my neighbor does this for a living, and the scope of work you mention seems like a multiperson event. contact me , daredoll at gmail, and i can put you in touch with him. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joly MacFie wrote: > > There is this one list that I've been on for ten years or so t

[videoblogging] Re: Live stream blog from an event

Sounds like a great gig- congrats! I use Livestream Studio (Studio is the free version) for live streaming video. It's totally web based - no software. Aside from streaming, you can also record a live stream. And you can upload and stream pre-recorded pieces. You can add titles, etc Ustream is ano

[videoblogging] Re: Live stream blog from an event

Here are the direct links to my launch pages for streaming live video: RetroVideo: http://historichomeworks.com/hhw/conf/vidconf.htm where I use FlashMeeting, which is rather low video quality, free service, somewhat difficult to get signed up and started using. Strong on video conferencing feat

[videoblogging] Re: Live stream blog from an event

http://www.youtube.com/user/dleesim#p/u/68/VbxcbGlRHZE i did invite my neighbor to join this list. i like having learned that likely the best of the new can be found here. i have forgotten more "new formats" than i ever learned, but i have learned to stay in touch with folks that know how to d

[videoblogging] Re: Live stream blog from an event

Both the Livestream and Ustream desktop apps work even better than the web based. Most important is that you have a fast internet connection, preferably wired and not subject to going down if all the attendees jump on the web. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, barrett jones wrote: > > Soun

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

fantastic and inspiring story Randolfe!!! If I was in a arm's throw... I would have GLADLY joined you !! Lookin' forward to that post. tonyhayden http://tonyhayden.blogspot.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe Wicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That was the title of an event he

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

Wow! Fan-bloody-tastic! Can't wait to see your vlog about it and congrats on experiencing such an unusual event. Sorry to hear about Mr. Cavett. I remember him, too and he was an amazingly aware and articulate host. cheers. Share www.rocknrolltv.net --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Randolfe

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

I looked it up and acording to IMDB he was born in '36 so that would make him 69. Your kindness might not have been taken as being so kind. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ronen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I got a chance to meet with Cave

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

t; > > - Original Message - > From: Ronen > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:30 AM > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY" > > > I got a chance to meet

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

logspot.com/ > 201-656-3280 > > > - Original Message ----- > From: Ronen > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:30 AM > Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY" > > > I got a

[videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

: The Immortality Institute > Hoboken, NJ > http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/ > 201-656-3280 > > > - Original Message - > From: Steve Watkins > To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:22 PM > Subject: [videobl

[videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

Very interesting and useful web feature -- it'll make moving information easier and intuitive. I notice the usage of microformats (hcalendar -- http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/hCalendar ) in the examples. It looks like it would be worthwhile to have a microformat for a videoblog entry. -

[videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:47:33 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Very interesting and useful web feature -- it'll make moving > > information easier and intuitive. I notice the usage of microformats

[videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:26:03 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Isn't hAtom specific to Atom syndication and rel enclosure to just the > > video file. I'm proposing a higher level, generalized stru

[videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:38:14 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup" > > wrote: > >> > >> hAtom is a representation of Atom concepts in HTML. So

[videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

I would expand this to enclose any other items like free form text: http://link/to/video.mov"; rel="enclosure" title="My Awesome Movie" type="video/quicktime">http://link/to/image/jpg";> Text on my videoblog Then anything outside of the ... would be considered non-videoblog information like re

Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

I got a chance to meet with Cavett -- he seemed very nice and open in person, just media-weary.  I take it that he would have been glad to speak with you, if not for you 'silly camera'.On 11/18/05, Share <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Wow! Fan-bloody-tastic! Can't wait to see your vlog about it

Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

Immortality InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280     - Original Message - From: Share To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:13 AM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW

Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

o bones about it.     Randolfe (Randy) Wicker   Videographer, Writer, ActivistAdvisor: The Immortality InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280     - Original Message - From: Ronen To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, Nov

Re: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY"

p://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280     - Original Message - From: Steve Watkins To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:22 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: "LIVE AND UNCENSORED IN NEW YORK CITY" Who are real pe

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:47:33 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Very interesting and useful web feature -- it'll make moving > information easier and intuitive. I notice the usage of microformats > (hcalendar -- http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/hCalendar ) in the > examples. It looks

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:26:03 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't hAtom specific to Atom syndication and rel enclosure to just the > video file. I'm proposing a higher level, generalized structure to > allow the user to specify the elements of a videoblog -- media, text, > etc. -- in

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:38:14 +0100, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Andreas Haugstrup" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> hAtom is a representation of Atom concepts in HTML. So it's based on > Atom, >> but not really specific to Atom. You could just as eas

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Live Clipboard - "clipboard of the web" standard

hAtom is a microformat for describing a blog post based on the concepts from the Atom format. Thus it would naturally have all the necessary info you're talking about. But I agree with you, we need a simple microformat for a video that is a little more specific than relEnclosure. I've made several