Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Jessica Rosner
There is a BIG difference between a film being shown IN a class with the professor ( Face to Face), and being put up on line for students to watch whenever and how often they want. UCLA and Georgia State were not doing this to help OFF campus students who could not go to class, they were doing it b

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Chuck McCann
Thank you, I've learned a thing or two from this dialogue. :) Best, Chuck On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, wrote: > Letting the "higher ups" make the decisions alone is never a good idea, > Chuck. Media folk need to take the lead and manifest strong leadership in > these issues because, frank

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Foster, Jennifer
At the risk of extending this firestorm further, I did not read anything at all in Chuck's response that suggested advising anyone to do anything illegal. It is indeed up to the organization's management to decide for the organization what risks they are willing to take. It is our responsibility t

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Jessica Rosner
Sorry Chris I did not mean I do not want to appear to be trashing the TEACH act, and I have no problem with clips/ portions being used. I just did not think that was what Chuck was referring to. Jessica On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Chris Lewis wrote: > I'm pretty much in agreement with Gar

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Chris Lewis
I'm pretty much in agreement with Gary on the unlicensed streaming of complete works. I think it's rash to scare off people from using the TEACH Act under any circumstances. If the guidelines are followed and only portions are used, I think it's a usable tool for works with no option for licensing.

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Jessica Rosner
Does that mean you advice people to do something that is illegal so they should do it in such a way as not to get caught? On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Chuck McCann wrote: > Jessica, thank you but no thank you. > > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jessica Rosner wrote: > >> Chuck, >> Do y

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread ghandman
Letting the "higher ups" make the decisions alone is never a good idea, Chuck. Media folk need to take the lead and manifest strong leadership in these issues because, frankly, administrators and faculty generally know squat about the issues, community common practice, legislation, and almost ever

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Chuck McCann
Jessica, thank you but no thank you. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Jessica Rosner wrote: > Chuck, > Do you think UCLA lawyers are idiots and just pulled their streaming for > fun? You want to encourage another school to have to pay legal fees while > this is still ongoing? Remember Federal

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Jessica Rosner
Chuck, Do you think UCLA lawyers are idiots and just pulled their streaming for fun? You want to encourage another school to have to pay legal fees while this is still ongoing? Remember Federal Law trumps professors who think they have a right to digitize and stream copyrighted material. Between

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Chuck McCann
The answer is, "possibly". Jane, explore the option of using course management software like BlackBoard, for example, to facilitate this endeavor. This will provide a closed network that is "reasonably secure". In addition it is by default only accessible to students on record for a class that has

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-17 Thread Val Gangwer
Umm...no. Until the legal field is cleared, and we have more bandwidth, it's not going to happen here. Val On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jane Sloan wrote: > Hello all, > > For those of you who have a couple spare minutes (!) > I'm interested in some current information on: > > if/under what c

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-16 Thread Jo Ann Reynolds
0-486-1406 jo_ann.reyno...@uconn.edu Question Reality -Original Message- From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jane Sloan Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:37 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: [Videolib] Streaming vide

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-16 Thread Brewer, Michael
brew...@u.library.arizona.edu<mailto:brew...@u.library.arizona.edu> From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 1:50 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-16 Thread ghandman
Hi Jane Do you mean doing this without a license. Hope you've been following the recent UCLA controversy. We stream lots of media for course reserves here, but all of the stuff we deliver has been licensed. I would sincerely recommend holding off streaming unlicensed materials under copyright u

Re: [Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-16 Thread Jessica Rosner
Um when you own the streaming rights to the material. On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Jane Sloan wrote: > Hello all, > > For those of you who have a couple spare minutes (!) > I'm interested in some current information on: > > if/under what conditions you are creating streaming video files to b

[Videolib] Streaming video for reserves

2010-02-16 Thread Jane Sloan
Hello all, For those of you who have a couple spare minutes (!) I'm interested in some current information on: if/under what conditions you are creating streaming video files to be placed under a password for course reserves. even a 'yes' or 'no' will be much appreciated, thank you, Jane --