Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Sarah I believe most librarians are good guys but I think they are under a lot of pressure from instructurs to get any material they need in whatever format they ask and from admiinstration to cut costs. I don't have the budge to go to conferences especially in Colorado but I there it is clear tha

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
I believe the schedule and presentation slides are online. Most librarians are trying to be the good guy and not rip other people off. I suggest you start actually attending these conferences before issuing uninformed blanket judgments from anonymous IP attorneys who weren't even there. Context

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Sarah Out of curiosity I checked with two copyright lawyers I know. Neither actually knew of the Kraemer seminars and neither had heard the one law film that was a sponsor ( along with many academic groups) but said that person listed as their IP leader was a trademark lawyer who was not involved i

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
ence) is and has always been in Colorado Springs. That's the one > that folks are talking about now. :) > > Eric > > Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > _ > From: Jessica Rosner > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:54 AM >

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Eric J Harbeson
om: Jessica Rosner mailto:maddux2...@gmail.com>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:54 AM Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption To: mailto:videolib@lists.berkeley.edu>> Yes I know this happens at Kraemer which I went to once in NYC BUT in the dozens of other webninars and seminars

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Jessica Rosner
Yes I know this happens at Kraemer which I went to once in NYC BUT in the dozens of other webninars and seminars mentioned here I never see any representation from from rights holders. I am curious if in the specific discussion on the "non profit" exemption was there any participation by right hold

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-10 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
Hi Jessica, You might be surprised to know that the UCCS Copyright conference was sponsored by (among others) a law firm specializing in intellectual property. Several IP attorneys gave a number of very useful presentations and engaged with attendees informally in discussions. Their presence d

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-09 Thread Bogage, Alan
: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Eric J Harbeson Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 1:00 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption All, 110(4) is a great (and under-appreciated) bit of law, but why would it

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-09 Thread Eric J Harbeson
...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 7:25 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption My problem with things like this and the you can stream any feature film released in theaters without permission/license claim/theory

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Jessica Rosner
My problem with things like this and the you can stream any feature film released in theaters without permission/license claim/theory is that all these "theories" some from the same exact voices in the same echo chamber. IF institutions actually believed this was legal, then they should state so

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
I think it is worthy of investigation. This is not an endorsement or an indication that I would consider using the exemption without having much more information. It benefits us all to have raised awareness of the law imho. Sarah McCleskey Head of Access Services Hofstra University Library sar

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Dennis Doros
I'm agreeing with Andy and would like to point out... "performance of a nondramatic literary or musical work *otherwise* than in a transmission to the public" The use of "otherwise" makes me believe that "transmission" (usually meaning a by mechanical method -- ie. a projector or monitor) to the

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Andrew Horbal
Hi deg and Sarah, 110(4) seems to me to refer specifically to "nondramatic *literary or musical work*[s]." The Copyright Office's glossary notes that "nondramatic literary works are intended to be read;

Re: [Videolib] Nonprofit exemption

2016-06-07 Thread Sarah E. McCleskey
It's section 110 (4). Fascinating. Sarah McCleskey Head of Access Services Hofstra University Library sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Deg Farrelly wrote: > > Attending the Kraemer Copyright Symposium in Colorado Springs. (Kenneth > Crewes and