hi
i'd like to get as large an archive as possible of this list in mbox
format. Looking around I don't see any archive in mbox format
surprisingly, does anyone know if this exists?
thanks!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i'd like to get as large an archive as possible of this list in mbox
format. Looking around I don't see any archive in mbox format
surprisingly, does anyone know if this exists?
thanks!
I've been archiving the vim, vim-dev and vim-multibyte lists locally, ever
steven smith wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've been archiving the vim, vim-dev and vim-multibyte lists locally,
ever since I switched over to Linux. The file is 19 meg by now. Shall
I send it to you as attachment by private email?
Please make sure you strip o
thank you! That would be perfect. If it's not too much trouble I wonder if
you could send four 5 meg files, you can split easily with:
split --verbose -b 500 Mboxfile 'vim.'
I just tested that I can receive those, but a 19 M file will get a reject.
if it's a hassle never mind I don't wish t
steven smith wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
No. Either you get it as it came through the list, or you don't; I'm
not gonna lose time&effort at editing a file which I'm providing "as
is" as a convenience to some other Vimmer.
Email addresses were sent to the list, so what's the matter?
Best
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 04:48:35PM +0200, A.J.Mechelynck wrote:
> >Other lists I've been on save archives with no addresses or addresses
> >mangled I think.
If you look at http://marc.info/?l=vim-dev&r=1&w=2, the
addresses are indeed mangled, but in such a way that anyone
with two brain cells and
Ali Polatel wrote:
A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
i'd like to get as large an archive as possible of this list in mbox
format. Looking around I don't see any archive in mbox format
surprisingly, does anyone know if this exists?
thanks!
I've been archivi
Hmm... This post of mine seems to be eliciting two kinds of reactions: "Me
too, me too" and "Don't, you fool, he may be a spammer harvesting addresses".
I think I'll leave it on the backburner for a while, waiting for the situation
to clarify. Comments, anyone?
This is the vim list, after all
Ehehe never mind about this, I had no idea this would stir everyone up.
I consider it fairly normal for list archives to be offered in mbox format
(ex. Lua and Template Toolkit and 5 million others) and like to keep them
around, since I can just drop them right into local folders in thunderbird
Tim Chase wrote:
Hmm... This post of mine seems to be eliciting two kinds of reactions:
"Me too, me too" and "Don't, you fool, he may be a spammer harvesting
addresses".
I think I'll leave it on the backburner for a while, waiting for the
situation to clarify. Comments, anyone?
This is the
fREW wrote:
[...]
The interesting thing is that the guy who is in question of being a
spammer is the same guy who asked for safeguards against that type of
thing...
no, he isn't; it was requested by "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (and later by Ali
Polatel), and warned against by "steven smith".
If my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehehe never mind about this, I had no idea this would stir everyone up.
I consider it fairly normal for list archives to be offered in mbox format
(ex. Lua and Template Toolkit and 5 million others) and like to keep them
around, since I can just drop them right into loca
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ehehe never mind about this, I had no idea this would stir everyone up.
I consider it fairly normal for list archives to be offered in mbox format
(ex. Lua and Template Toolkit and 5 million others) and like to keep them
around, since I c
fREW wrote:
On 5/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ehehe never mind about this, I had no idea this would stir everyone up.
I consider it fairly normal for list archives to be offered in mbox
format
(ex. Lua and Template Toolkit and 5 million others) and like to keep them
ar
* A.J.Mechelynck is quoted & my replies are inline below :
> Ali Polatel wrote:
> >A.J.Mechelynck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> yazmış:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>hi
> >>>i'd like to get as large an archive as possible of this list in mbox
> >>>format. Looking around I don't see any archive in mbox f
On Tue, 29 May 2007, "A.J.Mechelynck" apparently wrote:
> Hmm... This post of mine seems to be eliciting two kinds
> of reactions: "Me too, me too" and "Don't, you fool, he
> may be a spammer harvesting addresses".
> I think I'll leave it on the backburner for a while,
> waiting for the situa
On 5/29/07, Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2007, "A.J.Mechelynck" apparently wrote:
> Hmm... This post of mine seems to be eliciting two kinds
> of reactions: "Me too, me too" and "Don't, you fool, he
> may be a spammer harvesting addresses".
> I think I'll leave it on th
17 matches
Mail list logo
