On Tue, May 8, 2007 3:32 pm, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
The main goal now is to get the Vim tips collection back to live. It
has been dead for three months now!
I wasn't aware of this, and it's definitely a problem. Here's what I
propose we do:
1. Finalize a tip formatting standard.
2. Use the
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 10:33 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
I wasn't aware of this, and it's definitely a problem. Here's what I
propose we do:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
http://home.comcast.net/~gerisch/MediaWikiTemplates.html
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 13:06 -0500 schrieb Tom Purl:
We do have a Wikia site available if we want it
(http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page). I agree with you; it has a lot
of nice features, and may give us a bit more flexibility than the
wikibooks option. I think we should revisit this
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 13:06 -0500, Tom Purl wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2007 11:37 am, Sebastian Menge wrote:
First, im not sure about what you mean by a) formatting standard and
b) a script that supports the standard
is a) something like a template in mediawiki-speak? see:
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 16:07 -0700 schrieb Ian Tegebo:
The Wiki would ideally understand how to link to vim-scripts and vim-tips like
vimonline currently does. As a bonus, mailing-list posts would also linkable
Easy:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interwiki#Shorthand_for_non-wiki_sites
For
Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by importing the _extremely_
valuable vim helpfiles
On 5/8/07, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-05-08, Ian Tegebo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Tegebo wrote:
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion;
one could make a VimWiki more valuable by
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion; one
Hello Vim Developers,
Hello Vim Users,
some time ago there was a huge discussion about a Vim-Wiki. In the end
WikiBooks has the highest support. Still some whished for a Vim-only-Wiki
instead of beeing part of a larger project.
For this a new option is not open: SourceForge ended the beta for
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I think it's also important to have some people feeling responsible for
it so if someone doesn't follow the rules, they will
13 matches
Mail list logo
