On Wed, Apr 09, at 04:15 Charles E Campbell Jr wrote:
>
> Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > OK, so we do need to worry about this.
> >
> > This patch to message.c, replacing the previous one, should do it.
> >
> Hello!
>
> I applied the first patch, and it worked. However, the second one...
>
>
Hi,
Please issue,
:helpgrep Wordcount
let count = count + Wordcount(getline(n))
The Wordcount function does not exists.
Again from the same function, the "count" variable is a read only, so it
has to be preceded with an "l:". Funny thing is that the "count" var is
being mentioned fo
On Tue, Jun 17, at 01:57 Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> On 17/06/08 01:41, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >
> > p.s. shouldn't the flag have been called is_posix_sh ?
>
> It might have been called sh_is_posix, but it's too late for that --
> upwards compatibility again.
>
> As for "erroneously" -- I agree wi
On Sun, Jun 29, at 03:19 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
>
> Richard -
>
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:23, Markus Heidelberg
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have adapted my relativenumber patch to Vim 7.2a, initial version
> > > was from 21.02.2008. Unfortunately it didn't get into mainlin
Hi,
I was running a function, (say write()) to call redir to write in a
file and then another function, (say read()) to call readfile to read
the last entry from that same file, when I discovered that in every
second call to those functions, readfile couldn't read the last line of
the file, alth
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Jul 10, at 08:58 Andy Wokula wrote:
>
> Hmm, from my testing: :redir works a bit strange. While you think
> :echo "line" sends "line\n", actually "\nline" is redirected. That's
> why you get a first empty line in the file and the final EOL is missing.
> And readfile() doesn't
On Thu, Aug 21, at 12:26 Robert Webb wrote:
>
> I could also use readfile(), which would probably suffice, but is this
> more or less efficient than loading a file into a vim buffer. I will
> still need to read the whole file either way since I don't know how
> far through the file I will need t
On Mon, Sep 01, at 01:13 Luis Carvalho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm attaching a patch that provides a complete Lua [1] interface to Vim in
> case anyone finds it useful. The patch is against vim-7.2. Any feedback is
> welcome, of course. Disclaimer: this is my first post to the list and this is
> my fir
On Mon, Sep 01, at 10:57 Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote:
>
> Below is a minor diff to your patch.
>
Note to me:
Don't send again patches, when there is an angry wife near your shoulders.
--- vim72-lua.patch.orig2008-09-01 10:42:52.905306090 +0300
+++ vim72-lua.patch 20
On Mon, Sep 01, at 01:19 Luis Carvalho wrote:
> > > Below is a minor diff to your patch.
>
> Thank you. I'm attaching an updated version of the patch with a few more
> changes. I should probably find a place to put the latest version of the
> patch...
>
Thanks.
I think I've tried all the avail
On Mon, Sep 01, at 01:19 Luis Carvalho wrote:
> > > Below is a minor diff to your patch.
>
> Thank you. I'm attaching an updated version of the patch with a few more
> changes. I should probably find a place to put the latest version of the
> patch...
>
By the way,
I added your patch to the vi
11 matches
Mail list logo
