--- Lyndon Tiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.apple.com/macmini/
There were some photos of a fake called the iHome
floating around. It was very close to the look of the
Mac Mini. ;)
=
It will be total Fandemonium, Summer 2005!
Check website for further info.
http://www.fandemonium.org
--- Neal Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is neat but could it be the next road apple?
Power button in the back again. Groan...
Well, if it does the Road Apple, at least the Cube
will stack nicely on top...
=
It will be total Fandemonium, Summer 2005!
Check website for further
--- Nathan Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know if it will run for you or not.. But
Corel Wordperfect 3.5
on my 280c blows 5.1 out of the water any day for
me.. If it will run,
let me know and I'll mail it too you.. As I got it
through a free d/l as well..
WordPerfect 3.5e,
I believe it is really made for swithchers. A true Mac user had to
add the display ( 900 USD used for the cheapest Apple branded) and
the mouse and keyboard (other 100 bucks).
While a PC user will be happy either to stick with his/her original
stuff (display, mouse and keyboard) or to buy
I have 2 Classic II's with 10 MB RAM, one with 80 MB one with 500 MB hard
drives. I can use Microsoft Word 4.0 or 5.1 on either or both. Which would be
better? Or another Word Processor altogether?
I'd have to agree with others that MS Word peaked at 5.1 (on *any* platform).
But on a vintage
on 1/13/05 7:57, Guy Plunkett III at [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled:
I have 2 Classic II's with 10 MB RAM, one with 80 MB one with 500 MB hard
drives. I can use Microsoft Word 4.0 or 5.1 on either or both. Which would be
better? Or another Word Processor altogether?
I'd have to agree with
At 4:27 PM -0800 1/12/05, Kyle DePasquale wrote:
I was able to access the website, although in your link it says
'atanta' instead of 'atlanta'.
Okay, atlantavintagetravel.no-ip.info resolved but no joy on the website.
Kyle DePasquale
On Jan 12, 2005, at 3:33 PM, Thomas Burns wrote:
I can see
At 6:33 PM -0500 1/12/05, Thomas Burns wrote:
I can see IIci on my LAN, and FTP files to it from my XP box.
It is a dynamic dns service, but I have the program that updates the
IP every 10 mins or so.
I have ports 80 and 8080 forwared to that machine and it's also
outside the DMZ.
A few people
--- Neal Wingate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is neat but could it be the next road apple?
Power button in the back again. Groan...
The Performa 475 had a power button at the backside too, and that was by no
means a road Apple! What's wrong with power buttons at the backside?
--
Vintage
On Jan 12, 2005, at 11:56 pm, Michelle Klein-Hass wrote:
I think the Mac Mini is the natural heir to the niche of the LC. I
made a few
comments about it on my blog...you might want to read them:
http://www.msgeek.org/
I have five compelling potential uses for the thing listed.
I wonder if Mr.
Vintage Macs vintage.macs@mail.maclaunch.com writes:
I have 2 Classic II's with 10 MB RAM, one with 80 MB one with 500 MB
hard
drives. I can use Microsoft Word 4.0 or 5.1 on either or both. Which
would be
better? Or another Word Processor altogether?
Bailey
I've used Claris MacWrite II and
Vintage Macs vintage.macs@mail.maclaunch.com writes:
I can see IIci on my LAN, and FTP files to it from my XP box.
It is a dynamic dns service, but I have the program that updates the IP
every 10 mins or so.
I have ports 80 and 8080 forwared to that machine and it's also outside
the
DMZ.
A few
On Jan 13, 2005, at 23:35, Neal Wingate wrote:
I would like to add the idea was good but the execution
is all wrong. Next time I hope they form a focus group and actually
listen to what they have to say.
My school Linux box has the power button on the front... where the kids
kick it as they go
13 matches
Mail list logo
