Re: 6116 RA Adapter for DOS Card; Was: mac charly

2005-06-13 Thread Jeff Walther
n I spotted this: <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=25439&item=5207751072&rd=1> It looks like the oddball in the lot is the DOS adapter card. I'd send it direct by email, but I'm not sure I have the attributions with emails correct. -- Vintage Macs

Re: mac charly-Dos card adapter

2005-05-29 Thread Gregg Eshelman
> same plug in as your > card, you have the right vintage. The DOS card used in the 600/610/6100 was the same card, but the adaptor for the 6100 was more complex because it had to interface the 040 PDS to the new 601 PDS. The DOS card can also work in some of the other Quadras. It will be

Re: mac charly-Dos card adapter

2005-05-29 Thread lunceford1
x27;t work anyway, i read the specs for my own > card and it has special power needs, and it will only work in selected > macs, specifically designed for it > --- 610 & 650 had that option. Different plug in. Power Macs had a slot Quads & Cent

Re: Internal SCSI HD with WIN/DOS partition?

2004-06-20 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Niels Bretschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apple had this PC Exchange system extension (i thing > it was called > something like this) which allowed accessing > DOS-formatted floppys. > Will it also work with SCSI hard drives? Yes, it will, usually. What System or

Internal SCSI HD with WIN/DOS partition?

2004-06-20 Thread Niels Bretschneider
Apple had this PC Exchange system extension (i thing it was called something like this) which allowed accessing DOS-formatted floppys. Will it also work with SCSI hard drives? I would like to use a DOS/Windows formatted SCSI hard drive as an internal HD in my Performa 475 / Quadra 605. If

Re: DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-05 Thread Marten van de Kraats
I didnt want to run any form of windows (maybe win 3.1 for kicks) mostly for dos just to see how it worked on the mac. The technology is old enough that I figure the cards could be found rather inexpensively. Somehow I think that running windows me or xp on a IIfx would be even more of kick! I

Re: DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-05 Thread Powermac
wireless cards made. > > Hmm, a 486, even a 33mhz, would run Win98 fairly well. Especially > LitePCed. Would be amusing if it could be made to work, you'd have an > emulator with wireless capability when the Mac doesn't. > > Scott Holder > I didnt want to run any

Re: DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-04 Thread Scott Holder
Gregg Eshelman wrote: Orange Micro went on to produce several 486 NuBus cards, at least one with a 16 bit PC Card slot in the back. Hmmm, if there's such a thing as a 16bit wireless network PC Card. Yes, there were several 16 bit wireless cards made. Hmm, a 486, even a 33mhz, would run Win98 fair

Re: DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-04 Thread Vaughan Bromfield
On Friday, December 5, 2003, at 07:30 AM, Powermac wrote: > What DOS cards were made that would work in a IIfx nubus system? Do > they use > just 1 slot or 2? OrangePC cards would work in a IIfx (or any NuBus Mac that'll take 12 inch cards). Vaughan -- UTS CRICOS

Re: DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-04 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Powermac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What DOS cards were made that would work in a IIfx > nubus system? Do they use just 1 slot or 2? AST made a dual card 286, then Orange Micro bought it from AST, improved it then made a third one on a single card. AST's maxed out at 4 meg

DOS Card for IIfx

2003-12-04 Thread Powermac
What DOS cards were made that would work in a IIfx nubus system? Do they use just 1 slot or 2? I have a few empt slots left and was looking to see what toys would work in them. I have a supermac video card nubus jackhammer scsi card installed already. I might install a video spigot card (the

Mac-n-DOS list. Re: PowerMac 7200/120 PC Compatible

2002-10-16 Thread Gregg Eshelman
gt; PowerMacs list I guess. R.A. Cantrell is helping me > out though. Again, please > accept my apologies! My best, David You'll want to subscribe to the Mac-n-DOS list. :) = "Work it harder make it better do it faster makes us stronger. More than eve

Re: PC-DOS

2001-10-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Keith Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Will the aforementioned PC-DOS 2000 work on a Mac > DOS card? No reason why it shouldn't. = "The earth swarms with inhabitants. Why then should nature, which is fruitful to an excess here, be so very barren in the rest of

Re: Free Cell for Mac. Re: DOS

2001-10-13 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
pickle wrote: >Do a search on VersionTracker for "freecell" or "card game" and check out >the many, many, options. Dunno how many (if any) are 68K-compatible, but >anything capable of running VPC acceptably ought to be able to handle the >freecell games for Mac :) Found a couple versions on

Re: PC-DOS

2001-10-13 Thread Keith Johnson
Will the aforementioned PC-DOS 2000 work on a Mac DOS card? -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A | -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 | Free iBook! | Support Low E

Re: Free Cell for Mac. Re: DOS

2001-10-13 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
> > There is a card game that comes with Windoze '95 called, Free Cell. Does > > anyone know if there's a Mac version of this particular game? Gregg Eshelman wrote: >Ha! It's got you in its spell! ;-) Well, sort of... I enjoy the idea that winning FreeCell is primarily based on strategy &

More Free Cell Re: DOS

2001-10-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Eric McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It should (under other names, I think - Klondike? Or > is that another for > the original solitaire...) be on any "set" of > solitaire games. It's > definately not a Windows exclusive. Klondike is a different game than Free Cell. Klondike is one of

Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Eric McCann
At 05:18 PM 10/12/01 -0700, you wrote: >Hello All, > As long as we're DOSsing this subject around, There is a card game >that comes with Windoze '95 called, Free Cell. Does anyone know if >there's a Mac version of this particular game?... It seems a terrible >waste of time and hard drive space

Re: Free Cell for Mac. Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Rob Rosenbrock
Eric's Ultimate Solitaire! > Do a search on VersionTracker for "freecell" or "card game" and check out > the many, many, options. Dunno how many (if any) are 68K-compatible, but > anything capable of running VPC acceptably ought to be able to handle the > freecell games for Mac :) -- Vintage

Re: Free Cell for Mac. Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread the pickle
At 20:25 -0700 on 12/10/01, Gregg Eshelman wrote: >See if the online version at www.freecell.com works >for you on Mac. > >Free Cell made its first appearance in Windows as >the "pack in" game with the Win32s add-on for Windows 3.1x. Do a search on VersionTracker for "freecell" or "card game" an

Free Cell for Mac. Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Andrew Michael MacTao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello All, > As long as we're DOSsing this subject around, > There is a card game > that comes with Windoze '95 called, Free Cell. Does > anyone know if > there's a Mac version of this particular game?... It > seems a terrible > waste

Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
Hello All, As long as we're DOSsing this subject around, There is a card game that comes with Windoze '95 called, Free Cell. Does anyone know if there's a Mac version of this particular game?... It seems a terrible waste of time and hard drive space to have to run VirtualPC just for one ga

Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Eric McCann
At 09:14 PM 10/12/01 +1000, you wrote: > > Well, that may have been true earlier, but the newer versions of PC-DOS >were > > (IMHO) far superior to Microsoft's offerings, especially since MS-DOS 7 >was > > never a full product (Version of DOS Win95 is run on top o

Re: DOS

2001-10-12 Thread Adam
> Well, that may have been true earlier, but the newer versions of PC-DOS were > (IMHO) far superior to Microsoft's offerings, especially since MS-DOS 7 was > never a full product (Version of DOS Win95 is run on top of, missing most > utilities included in MS-DOS 6.22) I kno

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
Terry Mathews wrote: >Well, that may have been true earlier, but the newer versions of PC-DOS were >(IMHO) far superior to Microsoft's offerings, especially since MS-DOS 7 was >never a full product (Version of DOS Win95 is run on top of, missing most >utilities included in MS

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Marten van de Kraats
> >Hmmm, how about System 6-2001? Fully Y2K+ compliant >and lightning fast! 100% rewritten for PowerMac. :) >Providing 68040 and full FPU emulation it also >emulates a virtual 24bit mode to run those old >Mac apps... Yeah, that'll happen. > Well, system 6 already is y2k+ compliant and on my websi

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Gregg Eshelman
IBM now has PC-DOS 2000 with even more features. I think it even does TCP/IP. It's Y2K compliant and quite popular for use with Win 3.1x (which MS did finally release a Y2K fix for because of consumer demand) for "mission critical" applications that will not run under Win9x or

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Terry Mathews
Well, that may have been true earlier, but the newer versions of PC-DOS were (IMHO) far superior to Microsoft's offerings, especially since MS-DOS 7 was never a full product (Version of DOS Win95 is run on top of, missing most utilities included in MS-DOS 6.22) Terry > > Actually, PC

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, don't forget PC-DOS from IBM.. > > Actually, PC-DOS was MS-DOS rebranded by IBM. > Unsurprisingly, MS-DOS was > actually Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS acquired > and rebranded by > Microsoft, which was also called

Re: DOS

2001-10-11 Thread Adam
> OK, don't forget PC-DOS from IBM.. Actually, PC-DOS was MS-DOS rebranded by IBM. Unsurprisingly, MS-DOS was actually Seattle Computer Products 86-DOS acquired and rebranded by Microsoft, which was also called QDOS (Quick & Dirty DOS.) "I didn't have time to do it right,

Re: DOS

2001-10-08 Thread J.S. Garrison
-- >From: Amber Rhea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Vintage Macs) >Subject: Re: DOS >Date: Sun, Oct 7, 2001, 12:33 PM > > on 10/7/01 3:00 PM, (Vintage Macs) at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's

Re: DOS

2001-10-07 Thread Amber Rhea
got 2 versions of Deskmate. > And CP/M? Best studied and left laying on the dust of antiquity. > Most of the limited commands are obscure and stupid at best. I'm oddly fascinated with CP/M... I have a Kaypro II, a TRS-80, and a Z80 card in my Apple II. Hey, I'll learn anything tha

Re: DOS

2001-10-07 Thread KADaggett
My Reply follows quote. On 07/10/2001 09:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>>I've got 2 versions of Deskmate. >>>And CP/M? Best studied and left laying on the dust of antiquity. >>>Most of the limited commands are obscure and stupid at best. >>> >>>Jeff >> >>Now, now! That's no way to talk

Re: DOS

2001-10-07 Thread Jeff Garrison
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Vintage Macs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: Re: DOS >My Reply follows quote. On 06/10/2001 22:39 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >>>Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1

Re: DOS

2001-10-07 Thread KADaggett
; >To: Vintage Macs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:17 PM >Subject: DOS > >>Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here including a 1000 RL, plus >>some back breaking portables as well. Where do they fit in, and what >>about CPM? >>

Re: DOS

2001-10-06 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
DHill wrote: > >Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here including a 1000 RL, plus >>some back breaking portables as well. Where do they fit in, and what > >about CPM? Gregg Eshelman wrote: >I've got 2 versions of Deskmate. >And CP/M? Best studied and left laying on the dust of antiquity.

Re: DOS

2001-10-06 Thread Jeff Garrison
-Original Message- From: dhill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Vintage Macs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Saturday, October 06, 2001 2:17 PM Subject: DOS >Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here including a 1000 RL, plus >some back breaking portables as well. Where d

Re: DOS

2001-10-06 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- dhill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here > including a 1000 RL, plus > some back breaking portables as well. Where do they > fit in, and what > about CPM? > Dale Hop over to www.oldskool.org for some T1000 info. :) = "The earth swarms with inhabit

Re: was Re: DOS

2001-10-06 Thread Andrew Michael MacTao
Marten wrote: >You can fit them werever you like. Ouch! That could be painful! Iechyd Da, Andrew -- <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< Since Judgement Day has now come and gone, it is now up to those who have not passed this test, over the next few years of "tribulation"

was Re: DOS

2001-10-06 Thread Marten van de Kraats
>Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here including a 1000 RL, plus >some back breaking portables as well. Where do they fit in, and what >about CPM? >Dale Tandy 1000? CPM? Never heard of those Macs. I do know the plus and the back breaking portable though. You can fit them werever you like.

DOS

2001-10-06 Thread dhill
Hey I have a bunch Tandy 1000's around here including a 1000 RL, plus some back breaking portables as well. Where do they fit in, and what about CPM? Dale -- Caddo County Harpman - ccharpman! http://home.tanet.net/dhill "Do you think he might be compensating for something?" Shreck (01) -- V