OK, since no one else had any suggestion (besides Pickle) I shall try again
I tried to use the System Suitcase from the Disk Tools (Disk 6 of 6, none
of the others I have (2-5) have a System Suitcase/Folder) from System 7.0.1
to make a start-up disk for some of my older Macs. So far its a no go.
Steve Conrad wrote:
Of course, then you get into the Should I try Linux or MacOS on 'em for
that...
- Be a masochist and do it with A/UX :P
can you put A/UX on to a flat pac mac?...
i was under the impression i'd need something a little more powerful...
thats why i havent tried it
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 02:27 Europe/London, Scott Holder wrote:
At 12:54 AM 2/8/2003 +0100, you wrote:
We need to get the fun back into this list. ...
So tell us, why do you like flat pack macs so much? Do you have
experience with other kinds of Macs?
Marten
I love them because
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 07:10 Europe/London, Steve Conrad wrote:
Of course, then you get into the Should I try Linux or MacOS on 'em
for
that...
- Be a masochist and do it with A/UX :P
Sadly, and this really pisses me off, A/UX doesn't run on LCs.
--
Mark Benson
AIM -
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 09:58 Europe/London, iriXx wrote:
Steve Conrad wrote:
Of course, then you get into the Should I try Linux or MacOS on 'em
for
that...
- Be a masochist and do it with A/UX :P
can you put A/UX on to a flat pac mac?...
Narr... damn annoying it is too. It
Mark Benson wrote:
Not only that, but I quite literally found it on the side of the road.
I got 14 LCs, a IIcx, a 660av and a 7100 LoBo (now in the IIcx) all for
GBP40 (which was mostly for the 660av) + GBP13.50 carriage.
i met someone last night who told me they had 20 LCs thrown away
Mark Benson wrote:
can you put A/UX on to a flat pac mac?...
Narr... damn annoying it is too. It won't run on AV Quardas either
which is equally annoying as they are about the fastest 68k Macs about,
well the 840av certainly is, the 660av certainly runs faster than the
LC475 in 8.1.
--- Mark Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get a clutch of 040MCs and upgrade them then you can
try something like
Linux or BSD on them. As a rule Unix doesn't line
LC040s because of the FPU error/lack of FPU.
While it can be compiled to run on an LC040, it only
works on some of them. I bet
--- iriXx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i met someone last night who told me they had 20 LCs
thrown away in
their dumpster last week... sadly he couldnt carry
them :(... although
he did retrieve me something i've always wanted - a
R4000 SGI Indigo...
G THREW AWAY an R4000 Indigo???
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 13:55 Europe/London, iriXx wrote:
It runs well on an 030, even the SE/30. I have run it on a IIci quite
successfully. Now what I REALLY want is a version of A/UX that'll run
on a 7100/80, that'd really confuse the nutz off people who see my
7100cx :D. I am most
Gregg Eshelman wrote:
G THREW AWAY an R4000 Indigo??? Baka!
So what if it is around 10 years old.
... oh yeah...
the other thing he found in their dump a few years back
a working apple Lisa... !!!
he's the only person i've met who has one...
m~
--
iriXx
www.iriXx.org
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 14:06 Europe/London, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
--- Mark Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Get a clutch of 040MCs and upgrade them then you can
try something like
Linux or BSD on them. As a rule Unix doesn't line
LC040s because of the FPU error/lack of FPU.
While it
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 01:31 PM, Steve Conrad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to use the System Suitcase from the Disk Tools (Disk 6 of 6,
none
of the others I have (2-5) have a System Suitcase/Folder) from System
7.0.1
to make a start-up disk for some of my older Macs. So
At 02:51 PM 2/8/2003 +, you wrote:
Any exterior physical difference between an LC040
that linux will run on (albeit poorly) and one it
won't run on at all?
I know for a fact BSD will run until it encounters an FPU call then it
Kernel Panics and dies. :)
I don't know if Linux has a work
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 16:27 Europe/London, Scott Holder wrote:
Linux itself has FPU emulation, which is why it can work on thinks
like a
486SX and such. However, a lot of the LC040s not only don't have an
FPU,
but are bugged in such a way that FPU emulation like Linux's or SoftFPU
I know for a fact BSD will run until it encounters an FPU call then it
Kernel Panics and dies. :)
I don't know if Linux has a work round for it.
probably if there isnt, if you post to usenet at linux.debian.68k or
somewhere - or even the kernel developers list, linux.kernel, they might
Any exterior physical difference between an LC040
that linux will run on (albeit poorly) and one it
won't run on at all?
I know for a fact BSD will run until it encounters an FPU call then it
Kernel Panics and dies. :)
This isn't quite true. On one of the truly defective LC's (a known
Linux itself has FPU emulation, which is why it can work on thinks like a
486SX and such. However, a lot of the LC040s not only don't have an FPU,
but are bugged in such a way that FPU emulation like Linux's or SoftFPU
just plain won't work. I don't understand the logistics of it, but
right... i wonder, would it run on a Powerbook Duo230? that is my other
machine at the moment - i have it and a LC III, i've thought about
putting Linux on them but im really more inclined to stick with the
Apple OS's - i've got enough linux boxen as it is! :-)
Why not try NetBSD?
Cameron Kaiser wrote:
Why not try NetBSD?
http://www.netbsd.org/Ports/mac68k/
I don't think the Duo is supported, but the LC3 is. It's much more mature
than Linux on the Mac68k -- it's been around since the early 1990s when it
started as MacBSD.
can you actually still get copies
I don't think the Duo is supported, but the LC3 is. It's much more mature
than Linux on the Mac68k -- it's been around since the early 1990s when it
started as MacBSD.
can you actually still get copies of MacBSD?
Not MacBSD as such -- the codebase was absorbed into NetBSD and became
its
http://www.macbsd.org/macbsd/
Er,
http://www.macbsd.com/macbsd/
--
- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- /etc/motd: /earth is 98% full. please delete anyone you can.
OK, since no one else had any suggestion (besides Pickle) I shall try again
I tried to use the System Suitcase from the Disk Tools (Disk 6 of 6, none
of the others I have (2-5) have a System Suitcase/Folder) from System 7.0.1
to make a start-up disk for some of my older Macs. So far its a no go.
--- Mark Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bug occurs on those LC040s that have the error
in the FPU set, it
somehow conflicts with the existing FPU system and
causes the system to
crash because technically speaking it does have an
FPU.
Probably because the 68k Linux authors haven't
Subject header says it all. LC newbie yes. Newsgroups and the like are
old hat.
FPM unite!
Neal
~~~
www.turnoffyourtv.com
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital
At 02:28 PM 2/7/2003, Neal Wingate typed thusly:
FPM unite!
Fast Page Mode?
Fans of PowerMacs?
Former Performa Macintoshes?
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras
FPM unite! = Flat Pack Macs UNITE.
glad i could help..*giggle*
Neal
~~~
www.turnoffyourtv.com
--
Vintage Macs is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299 |
FPM unite! = Flat Pack Macs UNITE.
We need to get the fun back into this list. ...
So tell us, why do you like flat pack macs so much? Do you have
experience with other kinds of Macs?
Marten
--
--
Check out the System 6 Heaven:
On Friday, Feb 7, 2003, at 23:25 Europe/London, Neal Wingate wrote:
FPM unite! = Flat Pack Macs UNITE.
Ahhh, bless, a man after my own heart :D
--
Mark Benson
AIM - SilValleyPirate
Visit FlatPackMacs online: http://fpm.gotdns.com
Visit my Homepage: http://homepage.mac.com/markbenson
Vintage
At 12:54 AM 2/8/2003 +0100, you wrote:
We need to get the fun back into this list. ...
So tell us, why do you like flat pack macs so much? Do you have
experience with other kinds of Macs?
Marten
I love them because they're reasonably capable machines, but are so tiny
and tuck away in the corner
At 03:25 PM 2/7/2003, Neal Wingate typed thusly:
FPM unite! = Flat Pack Macs UNITE.
glad i could help..*giggle*
I should've remembered that. And I so like the Q607/Performa 476s I
have... OK, I don't use 'em much, and probably won't 'til I get money for a
NIC and larger (multi-gig) HD for
Of course, then you get into the Should I try Linux or MacOS on 'em for
that...
- Be a masochist and do it with A/UX :P
Steve Conrad
810 Main
Henrietta, MO 64036
816-494-5692 http://sasha91.0pi.com
www.fortunecity.com/rivendell/stonekeep/600
It is no
OK, since no one else had any suggestion (besides Pickle) I shall try again
I tried to use the System Suitcase from the Disk Tools (Disk 6 of 6, none
of the others I have (2-5) have a System Suitcase/Folder) from System 7.0.1
to make a start-up disk for some of my older Macs. So far its a no go.
33 matches
Mail list logo