This is a request made by Paul based on a statement made by Randy Bush
at the face to face BOF :
He feels that the document is too long and too complicated and should
only be ~ 4 pages. Paul would like discussion of this
point under a separate thread (i.e., this one).
Regards
Marshall
There are requirements on vendors that won't make it into the requirements
document:
1. Need on site support in every room during meetings
2. Need potential vendors to attend IETF meetings prior to bidding
3. Need to have potential bidders actually provide the service at a meeting
before we
Hi all,
I did not make the comment at today's meeting, since I did not want to
take too much time out of the busy agenda. Though, I would like to
insist on one point raised by Joel, related to the need for floor
control. Indeed, I do believe this becomes a mandatory requirement,
especially
On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
From today's meeting, taking to list.
Remote participation for users connecting via the PSTN though gateways into a
VoIP conference platform raises some issues.
One of these is registration . There are hacks like PINs that can be made
to
On Mar 30, 2012, at 1:11 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
From today's meeting, taking to list.
Remote participation for users connecting via the PSTN though gateways into a
VoIP conference platform raises some issues.
One of these is registration . There are hacks like PINs that can be made
to
[sorry for the resend]
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html.
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet
Dean:
From today's meeting, taking to list.
Remote participation for users connecting via the PSTN though gateways into a
VoIP conference platform raises some issues.
One of these is registration . There are hacks like PINs that can be made
to work.
But to me, the biggest problem is
On Fri Mar 30 14:01:52 2012, Yoav Nir wrote:
I disagree that providing service to people connecting from PSTN or
through a gateway from the wrong software (like Skype) needs have
any effect on the service provided for the other remote
participants. People might be excluded because they are
Hi John,
At 15:14 30-03-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
Just so we understand what we are talking about, that means all
eight tracks, plus the plenaries? My recollection of how much
Yes.
skilled transcribers can do at a time combined with the length
of our day, is that would mean at least 10
--On Friday, March 30, 2012 16:18 -0700 SM s...@resistor.net
wrote:
Hi John,
At 15:14 30-03-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
Just so we understand what we are talking about, that means
all eight tracks, plus the plenaries? My recollection of how
much
Yes.
skilled transcribers can do at a
On 2012/03/30 22:15, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Dave Cridlandd...@cridland.net wrote:
On Fri Mar 30 14:01:52 2012, Yoav Nir wrote:
I have carried my laptop up to the mike when channeling people
precisely so that there could be some
amount of interaction when
Personal experience from yesterday, being a remote presenter for about
half of the session in the IRI WG meeting:
- Meetecho gave a lot of options for audio. When testing, the Java stuff
didn't work, but Skypeout from Japan into the Italian Meetecho PSTN
number worked.
- The echo was tough,
12 matches
Mail list logo
