ed.
> (All of them good!)
Thanks for your kind words,
Dan
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Dan York
> Subject: FYI - the virtual meeting draft Suresh just mentioned in the plenary
> Date: July 19, 2017 at 6:36:05 PM GMT+2
> To: 99attend...@ietf.org
>
> FYI,
sion up with the main group I'm
interested in, and then separate Jabber chat windows for the other sessions.
So it's no big deal for me to also have a Jabber chat room for the working
group that I'm also in via Meetecho.
It does mean I'm in that room twice via two different
Tony (and everyone)
> On Apr 10, 2016, at 9:27 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote:
>
> There's potential use there at either the code sprint or hackathon. I could
> see how some either team could definitely include remote participants.
At the IETF 95 Hackathon in Buenos Aires, several teams DID have rem
John,
Great feedback. I was in BA this time but have been remote other times.
Comments inline:
> It got decidedly worse as the week wore on; so I suspect a memory
> problem;
I wonder if there was an increase in usage during the week, either of Meetecho
or also of the IETF network. We may b
