If you must use SIP, try using T.38 (make sure your upstream provider
supports it). If for some reason you can't, use G.711 (and not any
compressed codec).
You could also replace your ATAs with something like this:
https://www.voipsupply.com/manufacturer/sangoma/sangoma-fax-station-applliances
You could try emailing noc@ftr.com or asking on NANOG.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024, 12:16 PM Jim Rodgers via VoiceOps <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> Beginning early yesterday, we're seeing dropped voice rtp traffic to some
> of our business customers in the Los Angeles metro area on Frontier Comm
Thanks to everyone who responded! I received several contacts at Ribbon
(and I was able to connect with someone today), but none at Audiocodes. If
anyone has an Audiocodes sales contact I'd appreciate it. :)
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 6:24 PM Ross Tajvar wrote:
> Does anyone have sales conta
Does anyone have sales contacts at Ribbon or Audiocodes (for SBCs) they
could share with me? I'm allergic to filling out "contact us" forms, and
apparently my old contacts have moved on.
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
, and with no motivation
> by NANPA or the larger carriers to make calls less expensive for the
> reseller or end user, I see this going nowhere. Until there is some value
> in NANPA (plus all the other country telephony organizations) and the
> direct carriers leasing numbers to do s
We need BGP for VoIP! Wait no that's worse... /s
Jokes aside, my understanding of the way people do VoIP routing for private
peer interconnection is by looking up the OCN at call time and routing on
that. That way you don't have to worry about verifying individual numbers,
or keeping
This sounds like a carrier with a lot of SIP peers, which is already a
thing that exists today. It also requires a lot of time and work to build,
because you need some traffic for the other side to justify the cost to
interconnect with you.
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023, 5:05 PM Jawaid Bazyar via VoiceOps
GSM
>> gateway option that costs them 0.02 per minute they will issue you a rate
>> of say 0.3 per minute and if the GW is busy simply reject your calls. This
>> they they win whatever traffic you have going to them based on your A-Z
>> routing. I would tell you to look at
Hi all,
I have an asterisk PBX for personal/business use. I use Flowroute for both
origination and termination.
Recently I've started needing to make some international calls
(specifically mostly to the UK, but also some other places in Europe and
Australia). There've been a few numbers where
Depending on your use-case, you may have success with DIY:
https://github.com/crazy-max/ddns-route53
On Tue, May 23, 2023, 4:29 PM Dovid Bender via VoiceOps <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> We have been using dnsmadeeasy and it's been great. Not sure if they offer
> a migration tool.
>
> On
Surely you have commercial relationships with these entities, and can work
backward from "who am I paying?"?
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023, 4:26 PM Mike Hammett via VoiceOps <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> Historically, we used multiple entities to get us off-net numbers. Who,
> what, when, I don't
Are youasking for advice on how to stalk people?
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 6:54 PM jd via VoiceOps
wrote:
> Can anyone from onvoy contact me off list?
>
>
>
> Also, what is the best path for cyber stalking using sms from a voip
> provider?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
SMS routing is generally handled by NetNumber's routing database (the name
escapes me at the moment). NNIDs are the routing identifiers that they use
- perhaps they meant NNID vs SSID?
Twilio has a "hosted messaging" service, I think, which is where they
SMS-enable your number on their platform
>
> If you still want to allow 7-digit dialing and have a local 88X prefix,
> or if your dialplan allows 10-digit calls without a leading 1, then yes,
> you'll need a timeout. Or make it 9-988 until they pass another law.
>
I think they already did:
re: dialing 9 - I understand the plight of having to deal with legacy
expectations, but what's the point of sticking with this particular
one? What makes it not-useless?
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 12:29 AM Hunter Fuller wrote:
>
> We operate a system with the "dial 9" scheme (apparently "useless"
>
> On 6/16/2022 5:21 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> At Comcast, when you file an FCC complaint, it goes to these people (as of
> a couple years ago, might be different people now):
>
> William Landis | Engineer 3, Business Escalations
> 1415 West Diehl Road, Naperville, IL 60563
> Off
At Comcast, when you file an FCC complaint, it goes to these people (as of
a couple years ago, might be different people now):
William Landis | Engineer 3, Business Escalations
1415 West Diehl Road, Naperville, IL 60563
Office: (331) 814-3041
william_lan...@comcast.com
his boss:
Jeff Cox |
Sounds like you need to find another provider...?
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022, 7:10 PM Peter Beckman wrote:
> Vitelity hasn't posted anything about this, so I will for those that care.
>
> Short Version: Inbound SMS to all Vitelity DIDs failed between 0150 UTC and
> 1720 UTC on March 27, 2022
>
> Long
Anyone know how to get in touch with Mary Lou Carey? I've sent her a few
emails but haven't gotten a response.
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
I would be interested in this.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022, 2:29 AM Peter Beckman wrote:
> I'd like access to NetNumber CarrierID API to ensure that NNIDs (SMS
> Routing) for our DIDs are correct and do not change unexpectedly, with or
> without authorization. NetNumber charges $500 per month minimum,
Windstream and Lumen are terrible for that on wireline.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021, 6:35 PM Carlos Alvarez wrote:
> Additionally, I've experienced a number of these cellular ports that
> seemed hung in mid-port, where some calls flowed to the wrong carrier and
> would die there. The most amusing
On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 5:24 PM Mike Hammett wrote:
> I have IXes in areas where Inteliquent and Peerless have POPs. They
> haven't had any interest.
>
> I don't understand.
>
I understand. Serious customers will pay for a PNI. Industry partners
(other large telcos with whom they exchange a
I've used 2600hz and found it immature. Lots of bugs and design issues.
When it worked it was nice, but when it didn't work you were out of luck.
Support wasn't very good either. This was about a year ago - maybe it's
better now.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 10:07 PM Chris Wallace wrote:
> Metaswitch
I wish more people would reply-all to the list instead of going unicast. I
am interested in the answer, but I don't think it makes sense for every
interested party to respond "please email me too" when that's what the list
is for.
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 3:57 PM Mary Lou Carey
wrote:
> I got
> I don't know of any resellers of Bandwidth that would allow you direct
access to the Bandwidth API. The API is based on Account and you'd have
access to the full reseller account.
I believe Bandwidth allows subaccounts.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021, 10:08 PM Peter Beckman wrote:
> I've been happy
Is ther a reference on this? Or a news article or something?
On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, 11:42 AM Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Sounds pretty dark and dystopian.
>
> On 3/4/21 11:29 AM, Oren Yehezkely wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does anyone have some deep knowledge about AT and Verizon's move to
> > create
et Exchange
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
>
>
> --
> *From: *"Ross Tajvar"
> *To: *"VoiceOps"
> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 5, 2021 7:57:12 AM
> *Subject: *[VoiceOps] Voice peering
>
> Based on this presentation [0] from Comcast, they are interconnecting w
Based on this presentation [0] from Comcast, they are interconnecting with
their biggest voice peers via SIP rather than SS7. They appear to use ENUM
for route selection. I'm sure others are doing this too, though I can't
find anything public.
I'm interested if anyone has more info on how this
uit,
> and you would send it to the point code of the switch you're connected to
> that is the appropriate next hop for the call.
>
>
> --
> *From:* VoiceOps on behalf of Ross Tajvar
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 2, 2020 5:46 PM
> *To:* VoiceOp
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand how routing works in SS7-land. I am familiar with
portability, and I know (at least in the US) the first step in routing a
call is doing an LNP dip to get the LRN.
However, it looks like addresses in MTP3 are "point codes" (PCs) which are
assigned to switches.
Traceroutes in both directions during the problem period will make this
much easier to address.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020, 1:48 PM Mark Wiles wrote:
> Anyone from Comcast monitoring here?
>
>
>
> I know it’s a long shot; but, we have a wholesale partner in GA that
> resells our hosted services.
>
>
I'm also interested in this.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2020, 4:22 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have access to true mobile numbers for SMS (numbers that when
> a lookup is done, it will show the numbers as being truly mobile and not a
> regular number that can get SMS)? I am working on a
This is very cool! Should we (as a VoIP reseller/not a CLEC) be doing this
forward or should we expect our upstreams to do it?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020, 10:53 PM Mark R Lindsey, ECG
wrote:
> Fortunately, all we have to do is setup call forwarding for 988 calls to
> go to +1-800-273-8255
>
> If
I've done the same thing with Bandwidth before. A capable porting team
makes a big difference.
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020, 2:51 PM chris wrote:
>
> Glad we could help you sort through this. We know how painful these
> situations can be sometimes :)
>
> chris
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:33 PM Aaron
Sounds like they're jerking you around, and it's time to file a complaint
with the FCC.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, 4:20 PM Aaron C. de Bruyn via VoiceOps <
voiceops@voiceops.org> wrote:
> Someone messaged me off-list. I should have been clearer.
> We *have* included a copy of the bill and their
"The trigger event is known to be a leased fiber circuit failure from a
third party provider in the Southeast."
Wonder who the carrier is?
They have some poor redundancy if one circuit failure caused a national
outage.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, 3:53 PM Jared Geiger wrote:
>
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 10:01 PM Ball, Jared wrote:
> Many customers still send faxes. I know that this angers some people and
> they don't see the point. It does take 30 seconds to train someone on how
> to send a fax and it takes a lot longer to teach someone who is not
> computer savvy to
FreePBX has a commercial module that has worked for me in the past, though
their software release quality and support often leaves something to be
desired.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, 3:05 PM Ryan Delgrosso
wrote:
> My first suggestion is its not so hard to roll your own on top of
> freeswitch but if
twork Engineer that is
> like
> >>> the walking "Encyclopedia of Telecom"! I've brought him in on numerous
> jobs
> >>> when my needed help with picking equipment or the best method for
> operations
> >>> and he's always been helpful.
&
Hi all,
I am looking for some resources to help me understand how to interact with
the PSTN more directly. I have worked for companies which offered VoIP
service, but we've always used other carriers upstream (e.g. Bandwidth,
Flowroute, etc.). I've found a few references to the regulatory process
I'm looking to get in touch with someone on the Visible Wireless security
team. If you have a contact please shoot me their info.
Thanks,
Ross
___
VoiceOps mailing list
VoiceOps@voiceops.org
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops
In my experience, filing an FCC complaint does a lot to motivate someone
(usually someone with some away) from the carrier in question to speak to
you.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 10:45 PM Jamie Montgomery <
jamie.montgom...@comporium.com> wrote:
> Greetings..
>
>
>
> Looking for the proper way to
I don't know of any special purpose software that does this. I just use
regular diagramming software. I'm partial to draw.io.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 9:47 AM Izzy Goldstein - TeleGo
wrote:
> i need something that will draw the call flow
> lets say it will start by a DID, and go thru clauses to
Here's what I have regarding porting out. Hopefully something here will
help you. Good luck, my experience with them has been terrible.
Port Out - Taking #s from Windstream to other companies. (PON#)
Toll Free: 8008651498
Email: wci.scsc.ls...@windstream.com
Escalation Process:
1st Level:
44 matches
Mail list logo
