In reply to Mike Carrell's message of Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:21:20
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>- WHAT IS COLD FUSION (LENR, CANR,
>CMNS)?
Historically the definition has come to be any process generating
heat beyond normal chemistry, &/or resulting in transmutation of
elements, that happens at near room tempe
On Friday 08 April 2005 18:13, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
> In reply to Standing Bear's message of Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:42:28
> -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>
> >mirror fusion engine for main power. It is powered by a nuclear reactor.
> >If these things can get us to the moon where we can mine the tritiu
Hi Bill.
You write:
>Well, I've had my nose repeatedly rubbed in the fact that I barely exist
Perhaps you should post to your list more than once every two months.
you're ignoring us, not the other way around... Seriously, I understand
what you're saying, it's not quite what I had in mind, but go
> From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Akira Kawasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 4/8/2005 1:24:07 PM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, April 08, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 8 Apr 05 Tucson, AZ
1. PROLIFERATION: JUST WHAT THE WORLD NEEDS, MORE RELIABLE NUKES.
Three years
In the never ending game of musical chairs the ownership of Texas power
plants has an interesting history. Houston Lighting and Power Company ( Old
Houston Electric Company owned by Stone and Webster) partnered with City of
Austin ( Austin Power) and Central Power and Light (CPL, now AES) to
Vorts,
Peter Gluck is a veteran CF supporter who lives in
Romania. He asked me to forward the questions below for comment on vortex.
Mike Carrell
--
Dear Friends,
This was once a group dedicated
to
Cold Fusion and perhaps it still is.
Therefore I am tr
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4419313.stm
"China has announced it will build 40 new nuclear
reactors within the next 15 years, a big increase on
earlier plans. The move is intended to boost
electricity capacity as the country's economic boom
has caused serious power shortages."
> "when you go into your church, you talk about god.
> when we go into our teepee we talk TO god."
> - Chief Seattle -
Apparently that's a fake quote, written in 1974.
Most "Chief Seattle" quotes were taken from an article manufactured by an
author who was writing a Hollywood-ized movie script
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Keith Nagel wrote:
> I'll give everyone a day or two to respond to the list,
> and if ANYONE can post something which has some remote
> whiff of truth to it, I'll post the experiment and you
> can all do it for yourselves and see what I'm
> talking about. Everyone talks about B
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, John Berry wrote:
> Your analysis makes it tempting to try and build it, except that in air
> there really is a displacement current due to polarizing the air.
> A force would certainly be generated no doubt, but so would a stream of
> moving air.
>From the Chris Tinsley era:
I wrote:
I presume that means 1.3 million
MW nameplate capacity, or 415,000 MW real. That comes to 3,842 NPRE . .
.
I meant that if you crank these numbers, you get a world total electric
power demand equaling ~3,842 NPRE, and they are hoping to have wind
supply 12% of this total. Actually, that
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
>be reasonably safe, although
no one has found a good way to get rid of the
>waste yet.
Actually, there may be a several ways to "get rid" of the
waste.
One of the most interesting I have seen is a patent that uses a
technique involving a form of NMR to speed up the d
See the document I cited before:
http://www.awea.org/news/03-04-o5-GlobalWindEnergyMarkets.pdf.
Quote:
"According to the report Wind Force 12 (3), boosting investment in
wind energy to a level where it would
provide 12% of world electricity generation by 2020 would result in
annual reductions o
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:00:38
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I am assuming here that some kind of effective
>hydrogen buffer or giant batteries could smooth demand.
[snip]
At several times the energy density of lead-acid batteries, and a
fraction of one percent of the cost,
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:08:40
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Next generation nuclear reactors may well be cost effective, and they may
>be reasonably safe, although no one has found a good way to get rid of the
>waste yet.
Actually, there may be a several ways to "get rid
Hi Terry,
Boy, is this ever a product liability nightmare!
You will remember back in the good old days, when Vo users actually
posted about invention and technology, that our own John Schnurer
had done some work for the USAF concerning this technology. The
modality was magnetic eddy current induc
In reply to Standing Bear's message of Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:42:28
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>mirror fusion engine for main power. It is powered by a nuclear reactor.
>If these things can get us to the moon where we can mine the tritium, then
>pure fusion mirror devices become feasible. In any case, the m
I wrote:
In advanced countries such as
Japan where there is treatment and universal health care, AIDS is not
increasing. The number of infections in Japan is holding steady at
12,000, with fewer than 500 deaths per year.
That should be: the number of infected people in Japan in holding steady
at
Horace Heffner wrote:
It is perfectly logical that condom use will slow the spread of aids. It
does not take an expert to see that. Further, the more the onslaught is
delayed, the larger the number of people who will be saved by medical
advances if and when they come.
You are missing the point
At 8:23 AM 4/8/5, leaking pen wrote:
>your math assumes that all encounters are with someone who is hiv positive.
Not true. I made no assumptions that the sample data was valid or in what
context they would be valid. However, if it will make you happy I will now
suggest that a 1/1000 infection r
I wrote:
We could easily find the money
and the wind resources to 10 per year, or 50, and that would cost roughly
$250 billion than building 50 nuclear reactors. . .
.
That came out all scrambled up, and I am not even using voice
input.
I meant we could build the equivalent of 10 to 50 nuclear po
Standing Bear wrote:
Once the anti nuclear leftovers
from the maoist antiwar subversion campaign by
the heirs of the old Comintern of the 1970's are mostly dead or quiet,
and
that is happening now as most of these were drug users and have had short
lives; then the new atmosphere of nuclear com
"IMAGINE movies and computer games in which you get to smell, taste and perhaps even feel things. That's the tantalising prospect raised by a patent on a device for transmitting sensory data directly into the human brain - granted to none other than the entertainment giant Sony."
http://www.newsc
id like to clarify. i spent several days researching this issue about
a year ago for a similar discussion. the numbers i quote are
recollections.
heres another for you, btw. teens who were in abstinence based sex
education programs were shown to have a HIGHER rate of sex, and a
higher rate of u
Horace Heffner wrote:
I take it then that no one here
actually knows the failure rate of condoms
with regard to protection from aids.
No one here does, but people elsewhere do. I have some friends at the CDC
who could tell you all about it.
Yet there are such fervent
beliefs expressed regarding
On Tuesday 29 March 2005 13:59, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I wrote:
> >The biggest problem with charging stations would be lack of customers. I
> >think most people would find it more convenient to recharge at home
> >overnight, rather than interrupt their commute.
>
> In other words, charging stations
your math assumes that all encounters are with someone who is hiv positive.
On Apr 8, 2005 7:41 AM, Horace Heffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I take it then that no one here actually knows the failure rate of condoms
> with regard to protection from aids. Yet there are such fervent beliefs
> ex
I take it then that no one here actually knows the failure rate of condoms
with regard to protection from aids. Yet there are such fervent beliefs
expressed regarding promoting condom use as "safe sex". I can not see why
this posture is not utterly reckless.
If you can not understand my point re
Terry Blanton wrote:
I'm no expert; but, there are
some really exotic
proposals:
http://alt-e.blogspot.com/2004/12/wind-power-laddermills-high-altitude.html
That is strange! That thing is mechanical?!? It says the kites turn a
large wheel on the ground. It is hard to believe any material would
Wait! Don't give up so easily. Besides, you're in Utah and this list probably wouldn't exist were it not for the work performed by F&P there.
Besides, I wanted to tell you of a book, Glenn Kleier's "The Last Day", which has a scene where all the leaders of the world's religions come to Utah to
Several ways to look at Vortexians. Either they are a mixed collection of
absolute humorists masquerading as intelligent form of life, or they are
absolute intelligents trying to act like humorists.
A person like John, that can write with an eloquence, should not quit the
Vorts. Anyone fro
dont do that. we thrive on dissagreement.
On Apr 7, 2005 9:24 PM, John Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- John Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dang! I was going to stop talking.
> > You *could* reconsider.
> Thanks, Terry. You're absolutely right. I have reconsidered, and
32 matches
Mail list logo
