From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, the question was, doesn't anyone listen at radar frequencies,
without a directional antenna?
None that I know.
What form would a non-directional antenna have?
Harry
Terry Blanton wrote:
From: Robin van Spaandonk
No, the question was, doesn't anyone listen at radar frequencies,
without a directional antenna?
None that I know.
I have begun uploading the ICCF-11 papers, including ones that do not
require editing and ones that I cannot edit (because they are already in
Acrobat format). See:
http://lenr-canr.org/FilesByDate.htm
This one would be nice if true:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MoonDthenucleov.pdf
These two
I have started reading Carroll's stuff. He is certainly a man after
my own heart if the following gem is anything to go by.
--
If the reader detects a note of sarcasm in the above statement,
it is only because it was
This is actually not new; the ball has been happily rolling around for
years, to my knowledge. It is on display in a public museum. The testatika
machine has been supplying power to the Methernitha colony for years also;
many have seen it a documented it and it is conveniently ignored, like the
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Of course, if it really is a perpetual motion machine, then this'll be
the biggest thing since Relativity,
It'll be the biggest thing since Principia Mathematica. It's much bigger
than relativity.
PM of the first kind using static magnets goes down to the bedrock of
Mike Carrell wrote:
The testatika machine has been supplying power to the Methernitha colony
for years also; many have seen it a documented it and it is conveniently
ignored...
All the documentation of this device that I have seen proves absolutely
nothing. It consists of hearsay, blurry
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
This one would be nice if true:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MoonDthenucleov.pdf
Indeed, it is interesting, even if Moon fits into a certain
mold... but at least I hope that someone with experimental skills
is trying out the possible variations
Please stop cross-posting to Vortex and other groups.
Prometheus Effect wrote:
Guys,
How would you calculate the final KE of a vertically
falling ball assuming you know the mass of the ball, g
and you could accurately measure the transit time of
the last say 25mm of the vertical drop?
Then,
At 12:47 pm 04-05-05 -0700, Jones wrote:
Even if he is correct, mixing science with religion will get you
only a larger measure of suspicion and ridicule from the people
who matter in the physics establishment, and in a field which does
not need any added layers of disbelief, it is unwise to
Jed wrote:
Mike Carrell wrote:
The testatika machine has been supplying power to the Methernitha colony
for years also; many have seen it a documented it and it is conveniently
ignored...
All the documentation of this device that I have seen proves absolutely
nothing. It consists of
Jed wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Of course, if it really is a perpetual motion machine, then this'll be
the biggest thing since Relativity,
It'll be the biggest thing since Principia Mathematica. It's much bigger
than relativity.
PM of the first kind using static magnets goes
Wow Ed I don't think I've ever heard such optimism from you. It is
certainly welcome!
s
At 09:42 AM 5/3/2005 -0600, you wrote:
Quite the opposite, Jed. The field is moving forward on several
fronts. The field has now changed in two important ways. People who
have had some success are
Hey Frank.
You write:
I couldn't agree more. One has to turn water
into wine...if one wants to be believed. 8-)
OK Frank, you know I can't resist a good challenge *grin*
http://www.blacktable.com/gillin030901.htm
...but I'll need some ketchup too.
K.
Good point. It would have to be a point source. Even a dipole has
directionality.
Harry Veeder wrote:
What form would a non-directional antenna have?
Harry
Terry Blanton wrote:
From: Robin van Spaandonk
No, the question was, doesn't anyone listen at radar frequencies,
without a
From reading Carroll it is apparent he had a humor to temper his intellect.
As time goes by I am coming to realize that CF will emerge just as I am
considering the major movement will occur as the result of new mathematics
rather than physics alone. Carroll relied upon his math wisdom and
I wrote:
I classify both cold fusion and the Mills claims as anomalous energy.
Anomalous is not synonymous with unbelievable -- it just means there
is no explanation. Mills, unlike CF, does not have a textbook physics
explanation.
That is contradictory. Obviously I meant that anomalous
Mike Carrell wrote:
But people should at least be cognizant of the fact that they
are making extraordinary claims! And they should expect disbelief, and be
ready to deal with it. They should offer rock solid evidence even if it is
not extraordinary.
Ditto claims by Mills and Correa. As far as
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please stop cross-posting to Vortex and other
groups.
OK.
Just measure x0, x1, t0, and t1, plug them in, and
you get v0. Then
to find v1,
v1 = v0 + a*Dt
Hi Stephen,
I'm using Final Velocity = average velocity + g *
transit time / 2.
Hey Jed,
you write:
I am surprised they managed to sneak this into the archive. I predicted
will soon be yanked out.
It certainly will if you post the cached URL. Here's the link
with some staying power.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0505026
With 25 documents already filed, Widom will not
Prometheus Effect wrote:
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just measure x0, x1, t0, and t1, plug them in, and
you get v0. Then
to find v1,
v1 = v0 + a*Dt
Hi Stephen,
I'm using Final Velocity = average velocity + g *
transit time / 2. Then final KE = 1/2m * Final
Velocity^2
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly right. What is it strange is that many of
the people making these claims, including some well
educated ones, do not seem to realize this.
Hi Jed,
So can I ship you a SMOT and the measurement system so
you can prove the data I'm seeing is not
--- Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Obviously the KE is actually a little higher than
that if the horizontal velocity is nonzero,
There is almost no horizontal ball velocity on exit
but the ball does have some rotational KE which I
don't attempt to measure. To get a good exit all
Jed Rothwell wrote:
[ ... ]
Mills is much, much better and far more credible than people like the
Methernitha crowd, Greg Watson, or for that matter Correa. But he
still has a wide credibility gap, and he still has not made a real
effort to convince people. The last thing he told me, years
Hey Stephen,
You write:
He has lots of interesting results but if he has anything absolutely
airtight in the way of a public demonstration of something really new I
must have overlooked mention of it.
This ain't academia. You gots to pay to play.
He has a theory which requires throwing out QM
Guys,
Here is a ramp climb and drop at 1 frame / sec.
http://www.myfilehut.com/userfiles/prometheus_effect/ClimbandDropFramebyFrame.avi
Note the ball has no starting KE and no horizontal KE
on the vertical exit. The rotation about the exit
point does induce some rotational KE but I don't
Hey Mark,
you write:
At least one young scientist believes he was more correct than most will
allow.
You ought to let the poor boy out of the basement for some air, he
must have moss growing between his toes at this point.
It would probably help you more than hurt. Just a thought *smile*
K.
On Tuesday 03 May 2005 12:09, Keith Nagel wrote:
Google Pykrete and you'll find a wealth of information
about this odd bit of history.
http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/7/floatingisland.php
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Wed, 04 May 2005 16:47:02
-0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Good point. It would have to be a point source. Even a dipole has
directionality.
True, but you would have to be very lucky to point it's blind spot
right at the source.
Harry Veeder wrote:
What form would a
29 matches
Mail list logo
