thomas malloy wrote:
And Jed Rothwell replied'
Good at what? attracting funding? The last I heard, the last
generation of Takamak's were producing .85 units of usable energy
for each one input. This is a deal that only a bureaucrat, or an
idiot liberal could love.
Why do you ascribe
Jed, This should get you to the links on the nozzles Dynaflow has
done extensive work and testing of various nozzles as thier website indicates.
Never could understand how they could spend that much money and effote until I
found their website and learned they use " Uncle Fed" for research
Another link on Kowalski
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/
Richard
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160551,00.html
WASHINGTON With Congress poised to finally turn out an energy bill, a group
of former officials from both parties and the intelligence community gathered
in Washington Thursday to demonstrate how the world is flirting with disaster
on
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also said he knows about an
event that occurred with the fusor that had to be kept secret. Maybe
someone would like to ask him about that? While you are at it - say hello for
me.
Which Richard Hall? Formerly of the NSA?
http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,67982,00.html
The problem is that Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the geeks who coded Google
from the algorithm on up, are inserting themselves into our lives. They wish to
accompany us everywhere, forever. They want us to see the world through
Google-colored
From: Terry Blanton
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also
said he knows about an event that occurred with the
fusor that had to be kept secret. Maybe someone would
like to ask him about that? While you are at it - say
hello for me.
Which Richard
Blank- Original Message - From: RC Macaulay on Dynaflow
An interesting tidbit from the Dynaflow site regarding the
STRATOJET® Self-Resonating Jets nozzle
Once again we have unusual energy phenomena accompanied by the
sound-energy overlay thing - not that surprising - but if there
is
Terry..
What supposedly happened at ITT, my early years employer ?
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: proposed fusion reactor
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened
Well Thomas, I give hot fusion a 0 chance for success for the
following reasons:
1. 40 years and about 30 billion dollars have been required to get to
about 0.85 energy amplification for a few seconds. To be practical, an
energy amplification of at least 1000 for years will be needed. Better
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also said he knows
about an event that occurred with the fusor that had to be kept
secret.
Like the Puthoff/Chernitskii false information, this is another
very confused and inaccurate conclusion. There was no cover-up, no
conspiracy and no
thomas malloy wrote:
Let me restate the question. Do you of you people think that this thing
will work? IMHO, on a scale of 1 - 100, I give it a 5.
The ITER tokamak may never be built because of budget concerns. But if it
is constructed I expect it will meet most of the technical goals that
From: RC Macaulay
Terry..
What supposedly happened at ITT, my early years employer ?
That was Chris Arnold's message. Allegedly an event from a Farnsworth Fusor.
From RC Macaulay
Another link on Kowalski
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/
Richard
I especially found item #76 of particular relevance:
* * * * *
76) Secrecy in cold fusion research
Ludwik Kowalski (July 6, 2003)
Department of Mathematical Sciences
Montclair State University,
At 06:46 pm 21/06/2005 +0100, Grimer wrote:
William Beaty wrote:
snip
I suspect that we're looking at something unexplained.
If I'm right, then people have been staring right at Ball Lightning for
decades, while at the same time fooling ourselves with wrong explanations
which prove that
Here are two quotes from the Princeton University Plasma Physics Laboratory
(PPPL) Overview brochure. The first is an example of a narrowly defined
technical goal that is probably realistic and may well have been met (but I
wouldn't know):
Radio frequency heating and current drive
Hello Ed and fellow Vortexians,
I might call to your attention an analysis I created titled Comparison of
Hot and Cold Fusion, presented at the March, 2005 APS meeting.
It is slide #16 in this document:
http://newenergytimes.com/Library/2005KrivitS-AJournalisticInvestigation.pdf .
If anyone
Note that the PPPL closed down some years ago, and ITER was supposed to be
its successor.
- Jed
all the king's horses and all the king's men.
s
It happens there is a news article about ITER in today's Korea Herald:
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/23/200506230013.asp
Politics as usual.
- Jed
I've started to wonder why no one has suggested
acetylene as a fuel source for vehicles and generation. It contains 4-5
times
the calorific energy of hydrogen and can be readily
made from lime and charcoal, using off peak electricity.
yes, all politics, all the time.
At 10:53 AM 6/24/2005, you wrote:
It happens there is a news article about ITER in today's Korea Herald:
http://www.koreaherald.co.kr/SITE/data/html_dir/2005/06/23/200506230013.asp
Politics as usual.
- Jed
Jones, you sound upset with me for some reason.
My apologies to Richard HULL formisspelling his last name - I am getting old.
So, if you still think Hal did not see the Chernetski device - it must meanyou never did look at the Hal Puthoff video where he said he did. Now I understand. Hal
From: Christopher Arnold
Farnsworths Fusor never produced Fusion, now that's news to me as well.
This is one experiment that did not suffer the Little Effect:
http://earthtech.org/experiments/fusor/bigsys3.html
Little/Puthoff's replication of the Fusor.
Grimer wrote:
Still, no one seems to have twigged the significance
of (d^n)L/dt^n of very high orders.8-)
as n - infinity?
Harry
Following up on Richard's reference, viz.
=
Another link on Kowalski
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/
=
I came across this rather interesting piece
on Cluster Impact Fusion (CIF).
Frank,
From the sound of this, the molecule temperature is raised to 2.42 Million degrees F before being slammed into the steel, except I suspect this is a plasma reaction much like hot and cold fusion.Isn't it a strange coincidence how Tom Clator is making tritium with a 2000 volt plamsa, which
After writing the previous post (see below) I
dimly remembered that this subject had been
dealt with before. Sure enough, when I searched
the escribe archives with the string:
Cluster Impact Fusion
I found that Jones had raised it last
August with particular reference to the
Farnsworth fusor.
please, elaborate for us einsteins that dont think mathmatically.
On 6/24/05, Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grimer wrote:
Still, no one seems to have twigged the significance
of (d^n)L/dt^n of very high orders.8-)
as n - infinity?
Harry
--
Monsieur l'abbé,
At 04:20 pm 24/06/2005 -0700, you wrote:
Frank,
From the sound of this, the molecule temperature is raised to 2.42 Million
degrees F before being slammed into the steel, except I suspect this is a
plasma reaction much like hot and cold fusion. Isn't it a strange coincidence
how Tom Clator is
Grimer wrote...This is a truly wonderful piece of experimental
evidence. All it lacks is an explanation of what'sgoing
on.
http://www.dynaflow-inc.com/
http://blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/
Interesting observation Frank. I wasthinking aboutthe
impact while thinking about the JLN Labs
The first derivative of the angular momentum (L) with respect to time (t) is
dL/dt and is often called the torque.
The second derivative is (d^2)L/dt^2
The third derivative is (d^3)L/dt^3
The nth derivative is (d^n)L/dt^n
Harry
leaking pen wrote:
please, elaborate for us einsteins that
[Original Message]
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Akira Kawasaki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 6/24/2005 12:34:13 PM
Subject: WHAT'S NEW Friday, June 24, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Jun 05 Washington, DC
NOTICE: WN COMES OF AGE; IT WAS BORN 21 YEARS AGO, 29 JUN
32 matches
Mail list logo
