Title: Re: OffTopic: Lust and the bible
RC Macaulay wrote:
Hi Harry,
One would consider that after all the research you have done on the subject, you would give us answers instead of questions.
Hi Richard,
It is not my research, but the web page concludes by saying, "Only the
context ca
Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 9:34 PM
Subject: OffTopic: Lust and the bible
1. Can a Christian lust and still be qualified to
enter into the Kingdom of God?
1. Yes, if he figures out how to make cold fusion wo
Title: OffTopic: Lust and the bible
Hi Harry,
One would consider that after all the research
you have done on the subject, you would give us answers instead of
questions.
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, December 09
Jed wrote..
>It does not matter what the subject is, the argument must work in the
abstract, and a surprising number of arguments do not.
>This forum is refreshingly rigorous.
Hi Jed,
Well stated. Before I read your threads on Pascal, I had given him more
credit than was due.
Richard
Jed Rothwell wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
The exchange between Jed Rothwell and Bruce Wesley prompted me to
point out that no matter how persuasive you think your argument is,
the other person may dismiss it. Jed dismissed my argument about
spontaneous biogenesis too.
Note that I dismiss
Kyle R. Mcallister writes:
> As to logical fallaciesI do not like them. But worse, I even more
> dislike the fact that whenever there is a debate over something, people
> spend more time pointing out each other's use of logical fallacies and/or
> grammatical problems, then actually discussing
Jed wrote:
> Spontaneous biogenesis is at least hypothetically possible I suppose
> (it is not a logical fallacy), but I think it is factually wrong.
??? What else is there besides God-designed biogenesis and purely
spontaneous biogenesis? Something along the lines of Hoyle's panspermia? I'm
rath
I wrote:
The difference between a logical fallacy and an incorrect argument
is like the difference between a physics equation with an algebraic
error, and an equation which is mathematically correct but does
describe reality.
Meant "does NOT describe reality."
A famous physicist once dismis
thomas malloy wrote:
The exchange between Jed Rothwell and Bruce Wesley prompted me to
point out that no matter how persuasive you think your argument is,
the other person may dismiss it. Jed dismissed my argument about
spontaneous biogenesis too.
Note that I dismissed these for different re
Dec. 09, 2005
> [Original Message]
From: What's New <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12/9/2005 9:15:21 PM
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday December 9, 2005
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Dec 05 Washington, DC
1. REPORT CARDS: A LOT OF CHILDREN ARE
Vortexians;
I assume that the halos are caused by the decay of the radioneuclide
in the zirconium crystal. I assume that there are multiple decays. Is
the intensity of the halo determined by the number of decays? Is
there some way to determine the number of decay events by it's
intensity?
Vortexians;
The exchange between Jed Rothwell and Bruce Wesley prompted me to
point out that no matter how persuasive you think your argument is,
the other person may dismiss it. Jed dismissed my argument about
spontaneous biogenesis too.
--- http://USFamily.Net/dialup.html - $8.25/mo! --
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Fri, 09 Dec
2005 11:23:20 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>Intentional cavitation using a spinning perforated disk. Some believe
>the collapsing cavitation bubbles can cause fusion reactions. Others
>think they might tap vacuum energy (ZPE).
My favorite is hydri
OrionWorks wrote:
This post is primarily directed to both Jed, Steven Krivit,
Jed, in the past you have lamented the fact that you feared CF
research may be dieing a slow death, particularly due to what you
have perceived is a lack of necessary infusion of young scientists
into this risky &
Although they do not seem to mention it on the site,
this is the evolution of the *Griggs* cavitation pump
AFAIK.
They apparently dropped the OU claims and found other
uses for it.
--- David Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> How does this thing work?
> http://www.hydrodynamics
Intentional cavitation using a spinning perforated disk. Some believe
the collapsing cavitation bubbles can cause fusion reactions. Others
think they might tap vacuum energy (ZPE). This device has been
demonstrated to have a COP of approximately 1.2 or better.
Known here as the Griggs Hydro
Hi all
How does this thing work?
http://www.hydrodynamics.com/product_pics.htm
Does it excite water in some way?
David
This is not very new news. To any motion to which a wave can be
associated there can be a combination of incoming and outgoing waves.
In science the incoming waves are cancelled with the motive that there
aren't any sources to supply this incoming wave. If the bee can not
produce enough energy to c
For lack of a word. Laptop finger problem.
OTOH, counterflow heat exchange with a 20 degree F (above inlet) exit temperature rise:
0.25*21.43*20 = 107 BTU per minute or 1.88 Kilowatts.
- Original Message -
From: Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: 12/9/2005 2:46:15 AM
J.
This is some in-joke from a few weeks ago about rightwing extremists and
victimised minorities, if I remember?
F...! There are some really stupid people on the planet. It easy to forget
how dumb the masses are when one is dealing with uni. educated people most
of the day (and they are dumb too)
Old habits are hard to break. :-)
With the preponderance of virus and allergen species (and Carbon Monoxide) etc.,
out to do us in, I think using a counterflow air-to-air heat exchanger to raise the air temperature
to 750 degrees F in a chamber either electrically or hydrogen combustion heat
21 matches
Mail list logo
