On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:18:36
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
My point was not about ethics at all though, merely that pursuit of
nuclear weapons capability is a *stupid* strategy for a country like
Iran.
But
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:22:20 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
On Jun 15, 2007, at 8:00 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:18:36
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
My point was not about ethics at all though, merely that
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:28:07 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
Good post Robin, I disagree on some points but a good post. We will see.
I hope fusion will save the day as you do but its wise to consider the
options.
A few points:
1. If earth quakes could not dislodge oil and
On Jun 17, 2007, at 12:30 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Horace if I misread your intentions while reading between the
lines, then I
apologize.
Likewise, if I misread your intentions I apologize too.
If people can refrain from fighting one another, then I think a
gradual increase
in
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and
accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93 F,
23.85 C) both sides of a thin sheet of opaque material radiates
882.4 Watts per square meter.
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93 F,
23.85 C) both sides of a thin sheet of opaque material radiates 882.4
Watts
Just noticing some real obvious patterns in the alternative energy community.
There seems to be a lot of hit run, lol. It has some negative impact, and
therefore from here after I would like to have people close the discussion by
confirming their error.
Stiffler,
You said,
---
Your idea is
Dear all,
Although I was getting the Vo posts all right, I couldn't post for about a
week. My msgs to the list were getting lost in some sort of black hole, without
even an undelivered return message. This was due to, as I finally found out
thanks to Bill letting me know there had been changes
It works, except I overlooked one thing, my unsub request for my old address
didn't get through of course! So I am now getting the posts twice, Bill could
you kindly unsub my old address?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and
accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93
F, 23.85 C) both sides of a
I would love to answer, but I think Bill Beaty might be a tad upset with me.
Just consider me one of those below average intellect people and ignore what
I say and build you device based on your 'almighty correct theory'?
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(replying on-list as it may interest others with similar problems)
Good thing, now I'll be able to talk to you on-list, without relying on your
looking up the web archive. Those overzealous spam eating systems are dreadful.
BTW Jones, it occurs to me that your using gmail (or something similar
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 6:28 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 13, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Some basic facts present standard physics fully understands and
accepts:
Blackbody radiation: At a room temperature of 297 Kelvin (74.93 F,
The diode array is progressing. A backer is willing to
invest in nanoprototyping. There is some difficulty in
that electron beam lithography is slow at ~ 1 / 3 second
per 50 nm spot so the prototype will be microscopic with ~
10,000 diodes. In the future, a stamp pad of millions of
electron
On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Please allow me to enlighten you brother. It is not difficult to
build a machine that captures such ambient energy, period! The
challenge is in building a machine that can capture significant
ambient energy without building a
I want many people to be ready with talents, means, and
applications in mind to share the great social change of a
quick and definitive introduction of cheap, clean, and
decentralized energy. I welcome versions of the diode
array and its production equipment becoming low cost, thin
profit
Charles M. Brown wrote:
The diode array is progressing. A backer is willing to invest in
nanoprototyping. There is some difficulty in that electron beam
lithography is slow at ~ 1 / 3 second per 50 nm spot so the prototype
will be microscopic with ~ 10,000 diodes. In the future, a stamp pad of
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jun 17, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Please allow me to enlighten you brother. It is not difficult to build
a machine that captures such ambient energy, period! The challenge is
in building a machine that can capture significant ambient energy
without
On Jun 17, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace, my time here is to spread truth and logic to a dark world.
OK, it appears you really aren't here trolling for money then.
No offense to readers, but how baffling to date modern so-called
society still passively teaches and
Charles M. Brown wrote:
I want many people to be ready with talents, means, and applications in
mind to share the great social change of a quick and definitive
introduction of cheap, clean, and decentralized energy. I welcome
versions of the diode array and its production equipment becoming
20 matches
Mail list logo
