On this day in 1995 it was discovered that the star, Pegasi 51, has
the first known extrasolar planet.
About 15 years later, Gliese 581, 20 l.y. from Earth, is announced to
have a planet that might be habitable by humans.
To date there are 491 planets verified and many awaiting that status:
Dennis Cravens sent me some ideas about an experiment he proposes to
do. It is a demonstration intended to convince the public that cold
fusion is real. The information has been somewhat fragmentary; I do not
fully understand it, and I may be confusing two different experiments.
Assuming I
OK, now for a really wild suggestion..again with my Casimir cavities but this
time CLOSED Casimir cells in the materials used for these mechanical OU devices
where ambient gases are trapped forever at the time the of formation ...QUE
wild theories for movement of pyramid blocks :) where
Jed,
I agree simple thermal readouts of the reactor contents vs the ambient
would be sufficient but the Cravens experiment provides a perfect opportunity
to test the effect of circulation on an Arata type experiment. Maybe close loop
100ml of deuterium through the reactor and pump it
An interesting paper IRVING LANGMUIR AND ATOMIC HYDROGEN
http://alturl.com/asihb by Nicholas Moller where he comes to the same conclusion
I am positing regarding H2-H1 oscillation.
snip Had Langmuir been familiar with ZPE, he would most certainly have
reached other conclusions in terms of
* * *FRANK ZNIDARSIC QUANTUM TRANSITION re: LENR/Podkletnov corollary* * *
*Quantum Transition root-ingress-Plasma as original pre-atomic energy state a
la Frank Znidarsic*
I've said this all before, but the data is beginning to agree with the posit of
Protons' within
Terry Blanton wrote:
To date there are 491 planets verified and many awaiting that status:
That's neat! I did not know there are so many.
This list shows 5 methods of detecting planets. it is good that they
have multiple methods. I wonder how many planets have been detected by
two or more
Did this message show up here? I'm using a strange new e-mail system,
Mozilla Thunderbird, which does not show that it came through. Yet someone
responded.
Anyway, Dennis send me some corrections:
1. As I suspected I confused two different experiments. He explained, The
device that is good to a
I just spent an hour researching what someone on this list probably already
knows how to do - I want to make a real cheap and simple method to pump a small
quantity of h2 @ STP back and forth through a reactor. I intend to fill 2
sections of hose both connected to a small reactor tube with
Are these messages actually getting through or is it just my e-mail
system telling me they are? Sort of telling me that.
I guess I should check the Vortex archive . . .
I had to replace Eudora e-mail which I have been using for 20 years.
They don't make it anymore and it never did work with
From: Roarty, Francis X
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:21 PM
To: 'vortex-l@eskimo.com'
Subject:
An interesting paper IRVING LANGMUIR AND ATOMIC HYDROGEN
http://alturl.com/asihb by Nicholas Moller where he comes to the same conclusion
I am positing regarding H2-H1 oscillation.
snip Had
I wrote:
2. However, he says it is not a demonstration, but rather: It is to supply
data for a way to place the technology into public domain so that it could
not be blocked in the future.
I find that a little mystifying because this can easily be done without
performing an experiment. You
Hi Group!
I have missed participating in recent months; I have been occupied preparing
papers for and speaking at two conferences and preparing four patents relating
to Z-PEC and LPD; nonetheless, Langmuir's work is very relevant to ZPE, so I
had to respond!
Personally, I think Langmuirs
See:
http://www.publicdomainideas.org/index.php/Main_Page
QUOTE Public Domain Ideas (PDI) is a place where ideas and inventions
can be submitted to the public domain. It's like open-source software,
but for ideas instead of code. Once an idea is submitted to PDI, it
immediately goes into
Fran,
Would you please clear this up.
I am a little confused by the use of 90.000: If this means ninety-thousand,
then I would write it as 90,000. I realize that some use the first convention:
(90.000,0)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 13:21:25 -0400
From: francis.x.roa...@lmco.com
To:
From: Roarty, Francis X
* Upon recombination, heat energy is released to the tune of 90.000
cal/gram molecule.
Note: Moller made a silly mistake in his original paper in confusing c
with C (unless it has been corrected). This keeps being quoted online by
others, as if it was
Jed Group
Actually, once you file a provisional patent application, your filing date is
established, assuming you follow through with a non-provisional patent within a
year. I filed first and disclosed soon after, to network and hopefully get
help.
Why help someone pursue a patent?
I believe Mill's has already promoted the idea of hydrogen atoms acting as a
catalyst for other hydrogen atoms:
http://www.blacklightpower.com/papers/Eng%20Power050410S.pdf (pg 6) Hydrogen
atoms may serve as a catalyst wherin m=1, m=2, m=3 for one, two, and three
atoms, respectively, acting
The LED will not be convincing. How about just training an IR camera on it
and putting the image on the web? A slow stream of air
passing the cell would warm up and clearly show on the image.
Nick Palmer
On the side of the Planet - and the people - because they're worth it
Blogspot -
Good grief! The messages I was sending to Vortex were coming back and being
vectored into the Gmail spam folder! Hoist by my own petard.
Here I was blaming it on Mozilla Thunderbird.
You should check your spam filter from time to time.
- Jed
Nick Palmer ni...@wynterwood.co.uk wrote:
The LED will not be convincing. How about just training an IR camera on it
and putting the image on the web? A slow stream of air
passing the cell would warm up and clearly show on the image.
Why not simply install thermocouples and a thermometer in
Odd, gmail spam filter is normally very good.
Maybe you have marked some as spam once?
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Good grief! The messages I was sending to Vortex were coming back and being
vectored into the Gmail spam folder! Hoist by my own
Wow, just checked and found a swag of recent vort emails in there, none from
you though. odd.
maybe if everyone who uses gmail marks vort false positives as not spam
gmail will get the message.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:17 PM, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Odd, gmail spam filter is
23 matches
Mail list logo
