Dear Friends,
Just published the issue No. 486 of my newsletter
in combination with a Guest Editorial by an anti-cancer warrior.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2011/12/informavores-sunday-no-486.html
We have lost Scott and Yan in 2011 due to this criminal
illness.
One of the greatest personalitie
He will need a battery for start up. Once the scooter has reached a
sufficient speed it will propel itself perpetually by self charging.
I have met Thane in person and witnessed an earlier version of his
regenerative acceleration device.
Is he scammer? No one who has met him thinks he is a scamm
24 more peer reviewed LENR papers for you guys to read:
http://www.globalenergycorporation.net/Publications.aspx
On 12/18/2011 3:06 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
Hey, Joshua Cude, Mary Yugo, and Rich Murray are not vengeful,
irrational, dogmatic opponents of CF in any of its forms -- it is
simply co
Tell you want Joshua Cude, Rich Murray and Mary Yugo, choke on this as
you work you way through the data. There are other proofs besides CR-39
in the video. Film fogs, gamma detectors, the hot spot video, the
piezoelectric spikes, etc. I think I counted thirteen different proofs
that are redund
With respect as I in no way mean to make this statement personal: What a
load of self service CRAP. Are you blind as well as mentally impaired?
Do you ONLY see and read what you wish to see and read to support such a
BS statement?
On 12/18/2011 3:06 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
...it's been 22 yea
Hey, Joshua Cude, Mary Yugo, and Rich Murray are not vengeful,
irrational, dogmatic opponents of CF in any of its forms -- it is
simply contrary to the record of their posts on Vortex-L and other
public forums to denigrate them in this unworthy and untrue way --
they are simply participating compe
If Dr. Miley is in need of low thousands of dollars to get to a breakthrough,
is there a possibility of using kickstarter.com to raise the money? I'd kick in
a thousand dollar pledge if Jed said it would get the good doctor over the hump.
Sean
OK probably not new to the long term Vorts but still very interesting as
are Fleischmann's comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=gGJiLrG3fLY
I'm only small fish and late to the party. I do wish I was around when
your friend Eugene Mallove was alive. I may have ended up very bloody
and lying in the gutter but I would have put up a fight for what was
right. I admire your tenacity. I will do whatever I can to get a LENR
unit working cl
It appears that the research at SAPWAR is being shut down at the wrong time.
The demonstrations of Rossi and others should make those in charge take a short
pause at least. The importance of LENR to the future of the world is going to
be immense once it becomes mainstream and it is fortunate
At 04:00 AM 12/17/2011, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
I'll get to Robin's two questions at the end, but first this important
clue...
The following is peer-reviewed proof (published in Science and Nature
Photonics) that a high energy photon can be converted to a lower energy
photon with the 'm
So adept at stating the obvious.
You're about as useful as tits on a bullfrog.
-m
From: Mary Yugo [mailto:maryyu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 1:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Defkalion factory visit?
How do you figure that from those posts?
I'll be
I am sorry to report that the authorities have finally closed down cold
fusion research at SAPWAR. After Frank Gordon left, the project was on life
support. Recent reports on Fox News and elsewhere mentioned it, bringing
about the inevitable coup de grace.
Like most cold fusion projects, this was
Thx Horace... I peruse your stuff over the holidays.
Now more interesting clues that we're dealing with resonance/harmonics...
-mark
=
"Golden ratio" hints at hidden atomic symmetry
Jan. 7, 2010
Courtesy Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres and World Science
staff
By tuni
The video linked http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VymhJCcNBBc was made
May 29, 2009, well after the EarthTech web page you linked and shows
neutron interactions inside the CR-39 film. You really do need to watch
the whole video.
On 12/18/2011 8:46 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 a
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
wrote:
> What no comment on the SPAWAR presentation?
>
Brief search shows: "Our results do not provide a positive identification
of the origin of SPAWAR pits. However, they do show that chemical origin
is a distinct possibility and therefore tha
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VymhJCcNBBc
On 12/18/2011 8:43 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Whoa there. Can you stick a subject for a second? What in the world
makes you think Defkalion offered you a real opportunity to visit?
How's it going with the schedule for Rossi to deliver a suitable
therma
Whoa there. Can you stick a subject for a second? What in the world makes
you think Defkalion offered you a real opportunity to visit? How's it
going with the schedule for Rossi to deliver a suitable thermal plant to
connect to your generator?
With respect to SPAWAR, the main thing I know abou
What no comment on the SPAWAR presentation? No comments these people did
not know how to measure what they were observing or that someone faked
the results? While there is nothing wrong with holding an agnostic view
of LENR, you cross the line and loose objectiveness when you have an
agenda tha
PS: If you do get to enter their place, you will be the first person
**ever** to see the Hyperion device outside of maybe Defkalion staff and
people who couldn't talk about it. If there is a device, of course.
Be sure to take your hidden camera -- these days those are simple as a
slightly larger
How do you figure that from those posts?
I'll believe it when you have an appointment, a specific agenda to test
something by a particular method, and a street address. Until then it's
vapor and not steam.
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
wrote:
> Seems a door has been opened f
Seems a door has been opened for me to visit the Defkalion Hyperion
factory in Greece:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4811#p4811
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=4812#p4812
On Dec 17, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
How does one explain the observation that the energy involved with
interactions of electrons is a million times less than nuclear
interactions,
and yet the 'electric' charges are 'equal' (and opposite). I would
argue
that there is
Morning Horace!
Thx for the thoughtful commentary...
I am not suggesting that the ensembles that act as the energy sinks are all
over, or take up large areas of the material... they are localized, and
perhaps act as a 'cage' which contains the hi-E photon until it dissipates
its E into the lattice
On Dec 17, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
[snip]
This ties in with Alchemy as well, and the very difficult time LENR
scientists had with repeatability... conditions HAVE TO BE JUST
RIGHT, or
else the effect does not manifest.
This should tell you something about this kind
About anything that claims over unity concerning violations of the EM
field.
2011/12/17 Mary Yugo
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
>
>> MY, that is a violation worse than any Newton's law. EM do
>> not generally obey any Newton's law because even at low energies it is
>
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> MY, that is a violation worse than any Newton's law. EM do
> not generally obey any Newton's law because even at low energies it is
> sensitive to Lorentz invariance. So, a violation of Lenz law strongly
> implies violation of the constancy o
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> So, what I have to do is, for example, publish a paper in a peer reviewed
> journal with relevance to LENR and contact someone there, is that it?
It would certainly help to demonstrate some knowledge in the field
before requesting membership
So, what I have to do is, for example, publish a paper in a peer reviewed
journal with relevance to LENR and contact someone there, is that it?
2011/12/17 Terry Blanton
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Rocha
> wrote:
> > How can I become a member of that group?
>
> By invitation or re
MY, that is a violation worse than any Newton's law. EM do
not generally obey any Newton's law because even at low energies it is
sensitive to Lorentz invariance. So, a violation of Lenz law strongly
implies violation of the constancy of the speed of light or violation of
causality or violation of
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> How can I become a member of that group?
By invitation or referral of an existing member:
http://groups.google.com/group/condensedmatterdiscussion-?lnk=
Bon chance!
T
On 2011-12-17 17:38, Terry Blanton wrote:
[...] Me, I wouldn't want to be a part of a group who would have me as a
member. :-)
Personally I think I would find very interesting to even just read (I
don't think I'd even dare trying to post, to be honest!) what's going on
there, even if I wou
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Neither do I. I presumed that he was since he has done much to
> advance the field.
I really should say that he has done much to advance the awareness of
LENR. Recently he might have done more to obfuscate the research.
T
How can I become a member of that group?
2011/12/17 Terry Blanton
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:30 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
> wrote:
>
> > Wow! Krivit actually IS a member of the CMNS group? I didn't know that!
>
> Neither do I. I presumed that he was since he has done much to
>
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:30 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
wrote:
> Wow! Krivit actually IS a member of the CMNS group? I didn't know that!
Neither do I. I presumed that he was since he has done much to
advance the field. I contacted the group and asked how to join. They
need a ref
>From Terry:
> I don't think this is the first time SK has violated his
> confidentiality agreement with the CMNS group. They have the right to
> boot him you know. Not sure that is in their best interest, tho.
Wow! Krivit actually IS a member of the CMNS group? I didn't know that!
I'm surpris
>From Akira,
> On 2011-12-17 05:10, David ledin wrote:
> > http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/16/shells-interest-indicates-
> major-shift-for-lenr/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=NewEnergyTimesBlog
>
> In the comments:
>
> > Steven B. Krivit says:
> > December 17, 2011 at 00:21
> >
> > Receiv
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Thane posted a new video on dec.14.
> He says he is going to install the prototype shown in an electric scooter.
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dme4bW2fPhQ
>
Installing free energy devices into vehicles instead of properly testing
them fo
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Akira Shirakawa
wrote:
> While it's nice that now the general public knows, unwanted actions like
> this might prevent in the future disclosure of important LENR-related
> information to small groups like the CMNS mailing list. I hope Krivit
> realizes this.
I do
I've been informed of another typo/mistranslation. Celani has been working
with (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Preparata)
friend of Eugene Mallove
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qq6YY8eFeYI&feature=related one of the first
mainstream science's physicist that believed in cold
fusion and work
On 2011-12-17 05:10, David ledin wrote:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/16/shells-interest-indicates-major-shift-for-lenr/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=NewEnergyTimesBlog
In the comments:
Steven B. Krivit says:
December 17, 2011 at 00:21
Received via e–mail:
I ask you take down the
Thane posted a new video on dec.14.
He says he is going to install the prototype shown in an electric scooter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dme4bW2fPhQ
Harry
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
wrote:
> I think I've watched all of Thane's vids and from what I remember, there
I'll get to Robin's two questions at the end, but first this important
clue...
The following is peer-reviewed proof (published in Science and Nature
Photonics) that a high energy photon can be converted to a lower energy
photon with the 'missing' energy coupled into the lattice (physical
vibra
Deflation fusion theory provides a potential solution to the riddle
of why the radioactive byproducts 59CU29, 61Cu29 and 62Cu29 to the Ni
+ p reactions do not appear in Rossi's byproducts. This solution of
the specific radioactive byproducts problem is manifest if the
following rules are o
44 matches
Mail list logo