Are they going to publish this report in a respected Physics Journal? Which
one exactly?
Giovanni
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:10 AM, James Bowery wrote:
> Bologna University, Uppsala University and Royal Institute of Technology,
> Stockholm must all have good football teams.
>
>
> On Sun, May 19,
No football teams in Bologna University. In Italy Universities are focused
on academics not sports.
Giovanni
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:10 AM, James Bowery wrote:
> Bologna University, Uppsala University and Royal Institute of Technology,
> Stockholm must all have good football teams.
>
>
> On
Bologna University, Uppsala University and Royal Institute of Technology,
Stockholm must all have good football teams.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Brad Lowe wrote:
> Available here:
> http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
>
> Press release
>
> http://ecat.com/news/3rd-party-report-shows-anomalou
Re: Seven authors altogether (I think I remember hearing a larger number at
some point).
The number of involved scientists mentioned were high, somewhere around 15.
In the paper, there are various other people mentioned in the
acknowledgements section. These could be counted as involved scientists
>
> Computed volumetric and gravimetric energy densities were found to be far
> above those of any known chemical source. Even by the most conservative
> assumptions as to the errors in the measurements, the result is still one
> order of magnitude greater than conventional energy sources.
This i
Compact Reactor:
Pharis E. Williams
Abstract. Weyl's Gauge Principle of 1929 has been used to establish
Weyl's Quantum Principle (WQP) that requires that the Weyl scale factor
should be unity. It has been shown that the WQP requires the following:
quantum mechanics must be used to determine syst
Available here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.3913
Press release
http://ecat.com/news/3rd-party-report-shows-anomalous-heat-production-the-rossi-effect
and direct report download:
http://ecat.com/files/Indication-of-anomalous-heat-energy-production-in-a-reactor-device.pdf
29 page report... skimming
Ed,
I have been without pc all weekend but see that Mark and
Jones made a far better response than I could have managed, someone made
reference to the Haisch Rhueda paper on inertia which bears heavily on your
questions about if this is normal photon radiation . if they are correct
I wrote: "Some have seen enough to be persuaded that there is an a priori
case to be made for investigating the matter further." Typo -- I meant
"prima facie case."
Eric
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
I have no doubt that the result will be evewhelmingly against,
> meaningless, and based on ignorance...
>
I'm not so sure about that. I think that we should give people some credit.
By that I mean that it is my impression that professionals
I think the "vacuum' of space, especially near the Sun, is a lot more
energetic then we think due to those billions of tons of energetic
particles expelled daily in all different directions. It is apparently
very hard on equipment.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Things
Ed Storms states:
*Do you understand that you are focusing only on the Rossi method, while
I'm talking about all 5 of the other methods known to initiate nuclear
reactions? If your model cannot explain all methods and results, then it is
not very useful.*
Axil responds:
I can see how the nano-pa
If you looked at the reference I provided, you would have seen both
internal and external voids filled with Rydberg matter through hydrogen
loading.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 2:31 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
> Axil:
>
> Were the voids he studied at the surface??? If so, then you failed to read
Things were going so well.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/kepler/news/keplerm-20130515.html
Axil:
Were the voids he studied at the surface??? If so, then you failed to read
my posting accurately. I am discussing voids which are formed internally,
and completely isolated from the surface layers.
How did Miley determine that? If he was looking at surface defects (voids),
then that is
On May 19, 2013, at 11:55 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
To which Ed answered, mainly expressing what his view is inside this
void:
“The answer depends on which theory you accept. In my case, the void
consists initially of a strong negative charge created by the
electrons in the wall that a
George H. Miley has experimentally found Rydberg matter in the cavities.
End of story.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> I agree with what you say, Mark. The parameters have to be within range,
> but that range is generally not exceeded unless a real effort is made.
> Cons
I agree with what you say, Mark. The parameters have to be within
range, but that range is generally not exceeded unless a real effort
is made. Consequently, the laws usually apply and must not be ignored
just because they may fail outside of an extreme range. On the other
hand, I'm amuse
I have to stop getting distracted from the main point I wanted to discuss in
this thread.
I posited the following: I would like to drill down a little more into
nothingness, and look inside a NAE.
--
Assume we start out with a chunk of solid palladium with NO internal voids
or 'c
1) what’s inside that void?
Reference concerning nano-particles:
http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2010/ARL/Pres/06aMiley-Transmutations.pdf
*Transmutation Type LENR*
* *
George H. Miley
Connection to nano-particle catalytic LENR studies
-Our work attempts to nano-m
I have no doubt that the result will be evewhelmingly against,
meaningless, and based on ignorance...
the question is what could an opponent use to support his position?
maybe is is a consequence of the "democracy" meme, but it seems that
today we trust more majority than evidences... we also ask
Most likely less than .1%
2013/5/19 Alain Sepeda
> Just a practical question . (serious, I need a number)
> is there any statistic about the ratio of physicist who think LENR is not
> real?
>
>
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
Couldn't agree MORE with your statement that mathematicians can find a
mathematical way to explain anything, given a few initial assumptions. case
in point, quantum physics! ;-) And those pesky infinities.what to do with
those? Let's just 'renormalize' them. I wonder if it as a physicist or a
m
Alain Sepeda wrote:
Just a practical question . (serious, I need a number)
> is there any statistic about the ratio of physicist who think LENR is not
> real?
>
I do not think the question is meaningful. As Ed says, all discoveries
start with only one person believing them (the discoverer).
The
Ed said:
"Some of these behaviors have been described in ways we call laws because
the descriptions always apply."
I would add the following ending to that statement for it to be precise:
".because the descriptions always apply when experimental parameters are
within the ranges established
See please http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Marshall
Barry Marshall and Robin Warren, two Australian physicians
had great troubles with the colleagues.
Peter
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Alexander Hollins <
alexander.holl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wait, what about pylori?
>
>
> On Sun, May 1
Wait, what about pylori?
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
> It is about minorities
> % of physicists who believe in LENR;
> % of LENR- ists who believe in LENR+ (but wait a year!)
>
> I think the most relevant, relative recent case is that of Helicobacter
> pylori The case is
zero percent of those who have actually run the experiments themselves?
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
> Just a practical question . (serious, I need a number)
> is there any statistic about the ratio of physicist who think LENR is not
> real?
>
> is there a recent number a
It is about minorities
% of physicists who believe in LENR;
% of LENR- ists who believe in LENR+ (but wait a year!)
I think the most relevant, relative recent case is that of Helicobacter
pylori The case is well described, statistics cannot be made.
All the cases are half history , three quarter a
Mark, I agree that we do not know all we think we know and many rules
can be violated when conditions change. Nevertheless, we do have a
collection of observations that show how Nature behaves. Some of these
behaviors have been described in ways we call laws because the
descriptions always
Just a practical question . (serious, I need a number)
is there any statistic about the ratio of physicist who think LENR is not
real?
is there a recent number about the number or peer-reviewed papers, positive
or negative about LENR, eliminating the journal that are dedicated to LENr,
free energi
Very good. Thanks Ed for the insight.
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Edmund Storms wrote:
> Jack, you would have more success and not waste your time if you applied
> some basic chemistry. More hydrogen does not result in more loading. Only
> the pressure and temperature determine the amount
Jack, you would have more success and not waste your time if you
applied some basic chemistry. More hydrogen does not result in more
loading. Only the pressure and temperature determine the amount of
loading. In addition, Constantan does not dissolve much H in any
case. Addition of alumin
It must be emphasized that although cold fusion results are surprising, the
techniques are conventional and instruments are used within their design
specifications.
***This means that Cold Fusion doesn't really qualify as an extraordinary
claim requiring extraordinary proof. It is basically an or
pong
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Broken or disinterested?
>
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
