Re: [Vo]:My evaluation of the Rossi test

2013-05-27 Thread mixent
In reply to Andrew's message of Mon, 27 May 2013 20:22:25 -0700: Hi Andrew, [snip] Robin, Is Blacklight simply a patent repository these days or does it attempt to make and sell equipment also? I don't really keep tabs on them, but as I understand it they have always sold licenses, and I think

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Kevin O'Malley
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: The polariton is a PHOTON with a negative electric Charge. The polariton is a boson with spin = 1. The polariton forms the BEC, it concentrates negative electric charge, and all this has all been experimentally

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Axil Axil
The cavity in the polariton laser is imperfect. It allows photons to get out of the nano-cavities. If the nano-cavities are near perfect, the photons stay inside and aid the electrons to concentrate. See: http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/en/sonstiges/meldungen/detail/artikel/eine-neue-1/ I am

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Edmund Storms
On May 27, 2013, at 8:12 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote: The essential question is, Does a BEC form in any material? ***Yes, according to the 2 links I posted. Kevin, did you actually read this paper (

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread David Roberson
Axil, It is advantageous for the cavity to capture the photons for a reasonable amount of time. This process leads to a high Q cavity with significant gain. Dave -Original Message- From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, May 27, 2013 11:46 pm

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Joshua's position is that in the present measurements, the emissivity is implicitly taken into account twice when using an IR camera, and that in assuming that a high epsilon

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread Joshua Cude
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote: Josh questions: “I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. I don't think we know anything about the emissivity of that paint, nor its dependence on wavelength.” ** ** You

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread Andrew
Do you believe that, by fiddling with the exponent n and the emissivity e, you can show that P could be in actuality 3 times lower (roughly) than is calculated in the report? For if you can, then you've reduced COP to unity. Andrew - Original Message - From: Joshua Cude To:

[Vo]:Pekka Janhunen analysis supports the reported underestimation of radiated power

2013-05-27 Thread Harry Veeder
From a comment thread on e-catworld: http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/05/rossi-no-longer-controls-e-cat-business/ Pekka Janhunen on May 27, 2013 at 8:01 pm Off-topic for the thread: the question whether assuming emissivity equal to one indeed yields to underestimation of the radiated power. Now

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Kevin O'Malley
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote: Kevin, did you actually read this paper ( http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.1261v1.pdf)? ***I'm still making my way through it. It is not one of the links I posted. The conditions have no relationship to those in PdD

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread David Roberson
The question of the emissivity seems to keep rearing its head. One thing is certain and that is that the device looks very black within the visible spectrum at low temperatures. I assume that this suggests that it approaches a black body within that range, but I suppose that this may not be

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread Harry Veeder
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:18 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.netwrote: Josh questions: “I'm talking about the December test, when a different paint was used. I don't think we know anything about the

Re: [Vo]:Ekstrom critique of Levi et al.

2013-05-27 Thread Harry Veeder
David, As Joshua has suggested, the authors of the report should consult with an expert in spectral analysis and include his remarks in their report. harry On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:22 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: The question of the emissivity seems to keep rearing its

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Axil Axil
This is how this stuff looks to me now. Reference: http://www.umich.edu/~mctp/SciPrgPgs/events/2010/MQSS10/Talks/Littlewood_Michigan_PBL.pdf Infrared photons cause the electrons in a dipole to tunnel across a dielectric barrier. A separation of charge is produced with holes on one side of the

Re: [Vo]:BEC transforms photon frequency

2013-05-27 Thread Axil Axil
Here is how infrared photons increase the tunneling of electrons across a dielectric barrier. “Using the coherent coupling of light and matter to alter the tunneling properties of electrons was first discussed during the 1960s when it was established that photons can optically excite an

<    1   2   3