OK, dear Terry there were very harming outer circumstances
bad strategy, communication, sins, bad luck. However what really made the
trouble (trouble = is a problem you cannot solve)- weakness, unreliabily
ephemerity of excess heat, Incurable in the cradle cell)
Thank you for remembering Chris Tin
I wrote:
Even if a scientist erroneously disavows discovering a specific phenomenon
> like LENR, I suppose, this is not necessarily to say that history books
> won't recognize whatever role he played later on.
>
Just to clarify -- the above is a hypothetical. Even if what Steven Jones
was seeing
This looks like it was an effort to establish priority over the discovery.
The matter of priority regarding cold fusion was a big concern in 1989 and
1990. It is interesting that what Steven Jones and what Pons and
Fleischmann believed they were seeing and reported in their measurements
were diffe
Drowning in technocracy? Is that the one leads to lunacracy?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/19/movies/christoph-waltz-drowns-in-technocracy-in-the-zero-theorem.html?_r=0
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Oh, and be on the watch for someone named Qohen Leth.
Oh, and be on the watch for someone named Qohen Leth.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> That would be awesome.
Yea, well, just be careful and keep your 27b-6 in your jacket. Notice
that lately, Jones, alias Buttle or Tuttle, has done more to obfuscate
cold FUSION since Axis(Germany, Austria-Hungary, Ottoman Empire)
Axis(Germany,
That would be awesome.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> > Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
>
> Jeeze, 904, don't you get it: Steve Jones . . . Jones Beane . . .
> Harry Tuttle . . . . must I spel
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Foks0904 . wrote:
> Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
Jeeze, 904, don't you get it: Steve Jones . . . Jones Beane . . .
Harry Tuttle . . . . must I spell it out?
From: Foks0904
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
Steven is a talented researcher who is still at it, but not in LENR.
He posts on Harti’s forum from time to time.
He may have suffered more from the negative publicity surrounding P&F then they
did. Too bad f
Jones, interesting, what's your interpretation of this?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> *Of interest: *
>
>
>
> *BRIEF HISTORY OF COLD FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Secondary title:
> *
>
>
>
> *PIEZONUCLEAR FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY *
>
> *By BYU Professor
Of interest:
BRIEF HISTORY OF COLD FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY Secondary title:
PIEZONUCLEAR FUSION AT BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY
By BYU Professors Jae Ballif, William Evenson, and Steven Jones
Compiled in 1989
I. Scientific Team
II. History
Quote
I. Scientific Team
A. Brigham
What's also strange about Steve Jones is that he has been at the center of
the 9-11 debate over "thermite" being used to bring down buildings. It
seems he's both status quo on cold fusion, but insanely anti-status quo on
9-11 Truth. Bizarre? Or am I crazy one? I draw no conclusions about any of
thi
And who has been paying him? From wikipedia:
Muon-catalyzed fusion[edit]
In the mid-1980s, Jones and other BYU scientists worked on what he
referred to as Cold Nuclear Fusion in aScientific American article
(the process is currently known as muon-catalyzed fusion to avoid
confusion with the cold
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
> Dear Terry,
>
> can you explain how was this possible:
> "The whole bloody fiasco probably set back CF 30 years".
>
> As you probably know (I hope you are reading my Blog, I hope) i
> have an alternative explanation- the first discovered varian
In reply to Patrick Ellul's message of Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:42:30 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
>A cheap hydrogen generator that relies on a nickel nanoparticle may be the
>game-changer we have been waiting for.
>https://beta.cosmosmagazine.com/physical-sciences/hydrogen-fuel-water-almost-within-our-grasp
Fin
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:42:04 -0700:
Hi Eric,
On the face of it this sounds reasonable, but real life is seldom so simple.
Some deuterons will bounce off lattice nuclei in elastic collisions and head off
in completely different directions, so I would expect at lea
Thanks Axil, good citation and not surprising – I have been following this near
field region since day one, convinced that there is relativistic magic
occurring as you approach the focal limits described by Liptschitz et all where
the quantum forces from the solid geometry can initially focus.
Fran:
As is have posted many times, it is hard to tell what emerges from what.
What comes first the chicken of the egg.
Did you know that the Casmir force and zero point energy can be completely
controlled by polariton condensation.
*New regime in the Casimir force observed*
http://phys.org/new
Quantum Sphere has been making this kind of NiO nanopowder for many years. It
is available now but not cheap.
http://qsinano.com/
http://qsinano.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/qsi_nano_nickel_ni_5_oct_09.pdf
Ahern used it in his Arata replication and found it gave a small amount of
ex
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:32:02 -0700: [snip]
The usual "lame" rationalizations we have used is that the energy was
>borrowed in advance to overcome the Coulomb barrier or shed in advance to
>achieve the redundancy ...[/snip]
IMHO the lock step motion of gas ato
Dear Terry,
can you explain how was this possible:
"The whole bloody fiasco probably set back CF 30 years".
As you probably know (I hope you are reading my Blog, I hope) i
have an alternative explanation- the first discovered variant of
LENR is not viable and we have to investigate better variant
21 matches
Mail list logo
