The SPP can gather energy from two possible sources, the vacuum and fusion.
What proportion of energy can be extracted from each of those sources is
not yet knowable, but that energy could be enough to produce muons.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> From the Holmlid paper as f
>From the Holmlid paper as follows:
"This means a total intensity of 1.5 × 109 s−1 sr−1."
That intensity of muon production is too high for the source of muons to be
coming from space..
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> From the Holmlid paper as follows:
>
> "With the source
>From the Holmlid paper as follows:
"With the source turned off at the end of the experiments, the count was
1.6 × 105 thus a certain change due to the source. In another experiment,
the count was 1.08 × 105 at another source, sinking to 0.91 × 105 2 m away.
The standard deviation is around 300 wh
Eric--
Note my comment to Jones before I read your questions.
Bob
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 7:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Muons, SPP, DDL & RPF
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
D+D + muon → helium-4 + muon (instead of gam
Muons, SPP, DDL & RPFMuon decay rate is not a constant but is influenced by
various parameters. Spin and angular momentum vectors respectively, associated
with the muon and electron or positron resulting from the decay, respectively,
are coupled in the decay process. In this regard a magnetic f
Let me backtrack… If we follow the credo that “experiment rules” and that
Holmlid appears to be “making” muons, then the scenario which makes the most
sense could be that SPP are indeed extending the life of cosmic muons, which
then accumulate – giving the appearance that they are being made.
I
This is the reason that many physicists are skeptical of Holmlid.
The problem is that plasmons have no real mass, yet can couple with a photon to
create the quasiparticle we call the plasma polariton or SPP, which also has no
rest mass. If SPP have enough energy, perhaps they can convert to muon
-Original Message-
From: mixent@bigpond
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the
muon in the first place? A muon has a "mass" of 105.7 MeV. The only nuclear
reaction that can produce that sort of energy in one go is a heavy element
fission reaction. Even if
Eric and Jed,
Why do we need someone to control the amount of money in circulation?
Why do we need to split it up in pieces? I guess it is good for China they
can now fix their economy by letting others pay for it. This nationalistic
way of solving problems will go away. Just let it go natural.
I d
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:27 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
"Wikipedia uses a lot of poor, dated references in Cold Fusion and the
> editor "
>
> this could be forgiven, but given more recent reference to mainstream
> article (like il corriere della serra, or justice) they refuse to update.
>
Coming fro
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:45 PM, wrote:
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the
> muon in
> the first place?
I didn't want to be a downer and ask the obvious question as to where the
energy was coming to create muons and pions. ;)
Eric
The Muon comes from the SPP. In the Holmlid paper, the muons increased when
the lights in the lab were turned on. In order to minimize muon production,
the Rydberg matter had to be covered to exclude light.
"The sources give a slowly decaying muon signal for several hours and days
after being used
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I know little about economics, but limiting the amount of money based on
> the amount gold we have -- or the number of bitcoins -- seems like utter
> lunacy to me. It never worked in the past. There are two reasons:
>
> 1. The money supply has t
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 12 Aug 2015 21:18:24 -0500:
Hi,
Perhaps more to the point, where does the energy come from to create the muon in
the first place? A muon has a "mass" of 105.7 MeV. The only nuclear reaction
that can produce that sort of energy in one go is a heavy element
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Here is the problem. The muon lifetime is only 2 microseconds, so even
> travelling at C, the free path before complete decay is less than a
> kilometer.
I wonder if relativistic time dilation extends the half-life of the muon in
our frame of r
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> D+D + muon → helium-4 + muon (instead of gamma)
>
> … where the fist muon can be a cosmic muon which can catalyze a reaction
> and then be rejuvenated, renewed or replaced by the same fusion reaction
> that it catalyzes.
>
> The muon is a
The story of why his invention was not carried forward is a bit alarming
and sounds like a broken record...
http://autoweek.com/article/car-news/strange-life-and-stranger-death-paul-brown-case-another-smart-guy-doing-dumb-thing
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chris Zell wrote:
> Brown’s Resonan
The muon or maybe its father the pion is the connection between physics and
chemistry that typifies LENR. If there is a swarm of pions in and around
the nucleus, nuclear reactions are sure to occur. Pions may be more
pernicious then neutrons in terms of nuclear disruption.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at
Muons forms from decay of pions. There are different pions and ways
of decays but some without gamma, for example Pi+=U`+ neutrino.
The
Pions are involved in nuklear reactions as proton neutron exchange.
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion_
The Muons in Holmlids
measurements may come from P
Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:14 AM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]"
wrote:
Here a puzzling reference is made which will need clarification. It is in
regard to a seemingly myster
Its acronym time again. LENR is nothing if not full of acronyms. All of this
set of letters seems to work together.
Here is a website from Steve Byrnes - and it is quite well done. Even if you
disagree with the conclusions (and by now, most of us have our own opinions
on the details) it is well-re
Brown’s Resonant Battery would have been a wonderful invention, if it was true.
I get the impression that no one ever replicated his results.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 4:52 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Program and Abstracts of the All Russia
I have published this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/08/subjective-preview-of-22st-russian.html
Have no idea if something interesting will still appear today
Surprises are not predictable this makes them surprises.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
23 matches
Mail list logo
