On Mar 5, 2016 8:15 PM, wrote:
>
> In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:00:49 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
> >> In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:48:56 -0500:
> >> Hi,
> >> [snip]
> >>>In the
I wrote:
Breakdown of an inexpensive K-type thermocouple?
>
Indeed -- it seems that K-type thermocouples are found to suffer
unpredictable degradation in hydrogen atmospheres at temperatures above 900
C:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2836-Good-Calorimetry-articles/
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
The one thing that many of these replication attempts have in common is an
> apparent threshold temperature of about 1200C before gain starts.
>
>
>
> It would be helpful and intuitive, moving forward, to know what this
>
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Stephen Cooke
wrote:
[Quoting an abstract:] In spite of the fact that the X-ray surface
> brightness is estimated to be at nearly CXB (Cosmic X-ray Background)
> level, the X-ray spectrum shows significant deviations in relation to
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
BTW in muon decay, the electron is extremely fast and expected to have a
> steep peak at 52 MeV which would provide massive bremsstrahlung in a lead
> target, even (especially) in the situation of little or no excess heat
Yes, this is a mistruth.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck
> wrote:
>
> do not take this literally
>>
>> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
do not take this literally
>
> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>
>
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-04-2016-number-worth-million-words.html
>
Quoted from your blog post:
Andrea
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 18:46:19 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, H LV wrote:
>
>In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
>> energy is absorbed by the lattice as a whole due to the quantization
>> of
In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:00:49 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
>> In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:48:56 -0500:
>> Hi,
>> [snip]
>>>In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
>>>energy
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, H LV wrote:
In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
> energy is absorbed by the lattice as a whole due to the quantization
> of the vibrational states of the lattice.
I've always wondered about the explanation
The number is a little too perfect, don't you think?
8,400,000 kwh / 350 days / 24 hours/day = exactly 1.000 mw of power
output.
Craig
On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 19:57 +0200, Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>
> do not take this literally
>
>
> I bet we will have more info tomorrow or even later today
>
>
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 06:34:32 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Now, can we say that the proton always contains pions?
Not according to the standard model.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:52 PM, wrote:
> In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:48:56 -0500:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>>In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
>>energy is absorbed by the lattice as a whole due to the quantization
>>of the
In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 5 Mar 2016 11:48:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
>energy is absorbed by the lattice as a whole due to the quantization
>of the vibrational states of the lattice. I think this process could
>be inverted
What makes me believe that the Mills SunCell is a cavitation based system
is the degree that his electrodes were pitted, Mills had to go with a
liquid electrode system to get around the solid electrode degradation
problem.
His system also requires water to work.
Does anyone have a good email contact for Stubbs? The one listed in the Stubbs
pdf paper does not go through.
Bob Cook
Sent from Windows Mail
From: Bob Cook
Sent: Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:58 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Russ--
The Stubbs’s theory sounds a lot
This is a serious achievement I think where TU/e wrote a declaration about
Mumammer Yildiz magnet motor that state it runs and drives a load (without an
input) and consists of plastic parts, magnets, fixing screws and a steel axis
(shaft) and disks.
Jed,
This is the classical discussion about; is the glass half full or half
empty.
It really should be the only comment as it only is an issues about mindset
(attitude).
It is obvious to us with a half full attitude that one can always find
things and ways to widen the horizon.
Be it Space, peace,
Russ--
The Stubbs’s theory sounds a lot like the theory of Philippe Hatt presented at
the ICCF-19 conference. Hatt’s theory predicts the physical parameters of the
proton, neutron quite accurately compared to anything else I know of .
Stubbs and Hatt should get together.
Bob Cook
Fairness is not a simple concept, especially in real life and in essays..
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/03/mar-05-2016-what-is-fair-non-fair-and.html
Best wishes and - I hope good news soon- to you, friends!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Bob,
In addition to gamma rays from those two daughters you mentioned, one must also
include the branching intensity of radon itself.
Often with high energy alpha decay, as in radon – the alpha is accompanied by a
gamma ray which shares a fraction of the net energy released.
The
Any 63 minute half lives pop up?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> I stand corrected. It appears that 214Bi and 214Pb are gamma emitters in
> the radon daughter chain. Most of the signatures are between 100keV and
> 1MeV with a few above.
>
>
> On
I stand corrected. It appears that 214Bi and 214Pb are gamma emitters in
the radon daughter chain. Most of the signatures are between 100keV and
1MeV with a few above.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Bob,
>
>
>
> All three radon isotopes have gamma
Patrick Ellul wrote:
> One more that links to some other research:
> Automation won’t destroy jobs, but it will change them:
> https://blog.csiro.au/automation-wont-destroy-jobs-but-it-will-change-them-2/
>
>
I don't buy that, for the reasons given in this video. (This
In the Mössbauer effect when nucleus emits a photon all the recoil
energy is absorbed by the lattice as a whole due to the quantization
of the vibrational states of the lattice. I think this process could
be inverted where the vibrational energy of the lattice is absorbed by
a nucleus.
Harry
Bob,
All three radon isotopes have gamma decay channels in addition to alpha. The
signatures are well known (around 6 MeV).
Radon detection is a cottage industry in silicon valley
From: Bob Higgins
Jeff's setup may be more sensitive to radon than Alan's. The NaI detector that
Jeff's setup may be more sensitive to radon than Alan's. The NaI detector
that Alan used is only sensitive to gamma, and not beta. Radon decay
chains are primarily alpha and beta emissions. With the foil wrapped
around Jeff's GM detector, he probably does not have much alpha
sensitivity, but he
Radiation seems to show up when the power is low... the pumping is below
the threshold for the LENR reaction to fully establish itself. There is a
sweet spot in the power applied that jeff might have hit where the LENR
reaction is just about there but not quite there, MFMP sees this in their
gamma
From: Jack Cole
*
* Jeff Morriss has just published a nice study showing radiation of 7x
background.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2847-Celani-Type-Replication/
This is nice. Here is one comment to file away as a possible mundane
explanation.
Jeff Morriss
Back to Robin’s initial observation, it can be noted that Pions are composed of
two quarks which are indeed antiparticles to each other. In the standard model,
an up quark and an anti-down quark make up a π+, whereas a down quark and an
anti-up quark make up the π−, and these are the
Jeff Morriss has just published a nice study showing radiation of 7x
background. He did several things to verify (moving the detector, turning
off the power to the cell, and so forth). It seems pretty convincing. I
am unable to think of any alternative explanations.
If it were me, I'd try 4
http://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/emdrive-news-rumors/?utm_source=o1_medium=cpc_campaign=highppv_term=848564
A monopole magnetic beam caused protons and neutrons to decay into kaons.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Russ George wrote:
> Of course one makes kaons and pions through the prodding of nuclei with
> infiltrating protons so we have a bit of a chicken and egg puzzle.
>
33 matches
Mail list logo